OMG I can't believe one of you reported Bacon's post and it's now been moderated. You claim you want counter arguments to your ramping dot-joining fairytales but you can't handle it when someone speaks up. Really, really weak of you, whoever it was. Please don't just nod and smile at the AGM. Don't keep accepting the 'its revolutionary technology that'll take a while for people to understand' rhetoric because that excuse can be used forever if BRN keep releasing more iterations of their revolutionary IP - no one will ever understand it

and as a consequence no one will ever buy it.
It may not be the case that more iterations mean no one will buy it. The way I see it, when they said Akida 1000 was never meant to be a revenue generator but a demo chip, what happened was that they invented a ground breaking, earth shattering chip but there was no application for it. They have EAP's with the tech and money to try it out and when they said "this does not work" or "it would be btter if this would happen instead" type of things and Brainchip put all the bug fixes and enhancements in AK1500 and the more fundamental changes into AK2000.
I believe that cash is not coming in for AK1000 but with AK1500 for the more run-of-the-mill stuff and AK2000 for the more advanced stuff like deep space, star wars and medical applications, revenue can be explosive. The question now is when? Hopefully before some tech giants come up with a better alternative.
I am just a bit frustrated with the moving of the goal post. We saw no big revenue in 2022 when we were told to watch the financials and now it looks like nothing worth mentioning in 2023 as well.
I guess that is the risk of investing in something so new, it may take much longer time than originally expected to identify and build the applications.