@cosors
I have learnt through experience that no one can know all things or be expert at everything. Everyone can contribute in their field of expertise. Everyone is unique through learning, life, experience, interests etc. That’s why we have different people for different roles in the business, e.g. an accountant re finances, a lawyer re patents, an engineer to build things etc.
If you have a particular skill set and knowledge (which you do as an engineer in the automotive industry) then you are well placed to address this issue, identify problems and possible solutions. Often people thinks everyone knows what they know; however the reality is that everyone is in their own individual silo or bubble and what is in their bubble is completely different to someone else’s bubble or circle of knowledge or ideas.
I have worked in large organisations and quite often the people at the top are too far removed from the workers in the field; there is a disconnect and it creates problems. The workers grumble because management don’t fix their problems and management grumble because they aren’t seeing continuously improved results on KPI’s. Often unfortunately because of the disconnect the source of the problems aren’t addressed so the issues continue. Sometimes this is caused due to a hierarchal system within the workplace where rank/position reduces the ability to communicate freely. This can be solved by having a more open communication style where you don’t have to speak with 3 levels of bureaucracy to get the right person to listen work through the problem together.
A good company such as Brainchip should have the agility to be able to address issues quickly and without regard to personality. What I mean by that is it doesn’t matter whose idea wins: just use the best solution. Government is generally awful at this for a variety of reasons.
From my understanding of Brainchip’s management culture I think that if an opportunity presents itself, and they have the resources to do what you suggest then they would jump at the chance to influence a political situation by presenting a long lasting viable solution which benefits the environment and Brainchip.
The issue I think
@Fact Finder was raising is what I “think” was a problem with Nanose is that the sensor could detect the disease with appropriate accuracy however once you have used it, how is it cleaned so there is no contamination issues for the next test. Otherwise once you get one positive every test after that could be tainted and positive which renders it useless. This could be the same issue with the fuel sensor you are suggesting. It is not my field so I have no idea on how to fix that issue. Hopefully someone else has that covered!
So the short version is: if you have a good idea then raise it. There is nothing lost in doing so.
Cheers