BRN Discussion Ongoing

BaconLover

Founding Member
Not sure changing the CEO would do any good.
Takes for ever to know the pulse of the company, and what if the new CEO is not as good?
Drags the company back another year or two if that happens.

They are still managing to grow partnerships. Doesn't reflect on the SP, but I think that doesn't warrant a change of personnel this quick.

I want IP contracts as much as anyone here, but the last thing we want is to make a great asset to the company a scape goat because we didn't get deals within a few months.
Let's be real here, some of the Anns were avoided on the market by the Board (whatever the reasons were...), not CEO alone from what we know.
I wouldn't want to lose him for not the reasons that he was responsible for, let us wait for the AGM to see what he brings to the table.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 38 users

VictorG

Member
BRN can lay its cards on the table, let the world see everything they're working on and with whom they are working with.

It won’t change a shorter into a buyer because shorters will always be shorters, they are the scum of the earth. They will always argue their reasoning for shorting a stock even when the company has huge revenue, bright prospects, good management and solid assets.

Patience is a shorters kryptonite, and I have patience of Job.

Screenshot_20230206_193841_Chrome.jpg



 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 8 users

alwaysgreen

Top 20
Not sure changing the CEO would do any good.
Takes for ever to know the pulse of the company, and what if the new CEO is not as good?
Drags the company back another year or two if that happens.

They are still managing to grow partnerships. Doesn't reflect on the SP, but I think that doesn't warrant a change of personnel this quick.

I want IP contracts as much as anyone here, but the last thing we want is to make a great asset to the company a scape goat because we didn't get deals within a few months.
Let's be real here, some of the Anns were avoided on the market by the Board (whatever the reasons were...), not CEO alone from what we know.
I wouldn't want to lose him for not the reasons that he was responsible for, let us wait for the AGM to see what he brings to the table.
I'm not calling for his head, just wondering what the difficulty is with getting people to sign on the dotted line? If there are no license signings this quarter, do you think there should be some sort of explanation as to why? Or at least an update on whether negotiations are progressing?

Aside from the lack of licenses, I think Sean has done an excellent job, transitioning the company to an IP company and really ramping up the sales team. Partnerships are also amazing and I can't wait for them to bear (bare?) fruit.

I'm just hungry now and really want a few mangoes and cherries in the form of IP licenses! 😁
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Tothemoon24

Top 20
Just my opinion. ( yes there like arseholes)

If I was getting frustrated by the lack of IP deals & a stale share price .

The last place I be spending my time would be on this forum , for me it would lead me to becoming more frustrated.
No body can make you feel any better or provide you with any information that will help ease your frustrations.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 28 users
I trust they are trying to, but you can only reward results. Give someone else a go.

So becoming an Intel IFS member is a non event? They were a direct competitor. That’s massive they have signed us up.

They want to achieve market share and need Akida. We are now in their pipeline. Intel want to make money. Intel want to remain relevant. They want to keep up with SiFive and Arm. Intel will now be pushing our product where they can‘t use theIr research chip.



It’s been discussed numerous times how long the process to go to market is. Mercedes Benz will have us in their cars by 2025 by the latest. How many is still questionable but Jeremy NADAL stated their could quite possibly be 70 sensors (my words) per vehicle. Mercedes sell roughly 2 million cars a year. Great times ahead!

The companies are protecting Billion dollar markets. They will keep their NDA’s to their chest until the last possible time to ensure they have a competitive edge. I would too!


This has all been discussed before: it’s exhausting!
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 59 users

alwaysgreen

Top 20
Just my opinion. ( yes there like arseholes)

If I was getting frustrated by the lack of IP deals & a stale share price .

The last place I be spending my time would be on this forum , for me it would lead me to becoming more frustrated.
No body can make you feel any better or provide you with any information that will help ease your frustrations.
Yeah but I can't talk to my wife about it haha. She couldn't care less about Brainchip. Just shooting the breeze with other shareholders.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 12 users

Labsy

Regular
I trust they are trying to, but you can only reward results. Give someone else a go.
Surely you are joking right?
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users

Tothemoon24

Top 20
Yeah but I can't talk to my wife about it haha. She couldn't care less about Brainchip. Just shooting the breeze with other shareholders.
That’s fair enough mate each to their own , I’m just saying this isn’t the place for me to be if I was ever feeling down on the chip .
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users
TBH I think we do, in fact, need China. A deal there could stop the rot. I'm not sure who/why/when we decided that we didn't need them. Perhaps we were blinded by the SP at the time. Now we need to eat humble pie. It's not that difficult. Trust is a transitive relationship. If the CEO can't trust us with his plans for the future, he should be replaced by someone who will, and we can trust that person in return. It's not too late for the BoD to share their plans, but after the next annual report just might be.

Hint: any material deal will do at this stage.
9.41min “and frankly we don’t need China right now”
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 8 users
Perhaps they prefer whatever BrainChip can produce 🤓
😂 that's my thought also mate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Iseki

Regular
So becoming an Intel IFS member is a non event? They were a direct competitor. That’s massive they have signed us up.

They want to achieve market share and need Akida. We are now in their pipeline. Intel want to make money. Intel want to remain relevant. They want to keep up with SiFive and Arm. Intel will now be pushing our product where they can‘t use theIr research chip.



It’s been discussed numerous times how long the process to go to market is. Mercedes Benz will have us in their cars by 2025 by the latest. How many is still questionable but Jeremy NADAL stated their could quite possibly be 70 sensors (my words) per vehicle. Mercedes sell roughly 2 million cars a year. Great times ahead!

The companies are protecting Billion dollar markets. They will keep their NDA’s to their chest until the last possible time to ensure they have a competitive edge. I would too!


This has all been discussed before: it’s exhausting!
Being an Intel IFS is not the same in them investing a measly (for them) $10Mill to come up with a chip that they can use/sell/own.

We went for the big play - IP only and everyone will que up. Except they didn't. What we were expecting was that Intel would license Akida IP and build their own version of Akida 1500. But they didn't. But they put our logo on a web page. Nice.

So now we're making the advanced chip the Intel won't own and didn't want to own.

So yes, becoming an Intel IFS member is a non event. That's why there was no announcement.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 6 users
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
Being an Intel IFS is not the same in them investing a measly (for them) $10Mill to come up with a chip that they can use/sell/own.

We went for the big play - IP only and everyone will que up. Except they didn't. What we were expecting was that Intel would license Akida IP and build their own version of Akida 1500. But they didn't. But they put our logo on a web page. Nice.

So now we're making the advanced chip the Intel won't own and didn't want to own.

So yes, becoming an Intel IFS member is a non event. That's why there was no announcement.
I'm not sure about most here but I don't expect anything from IFS yet.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

Iseki

Regular
Surely you are joking right?
I wish!!!
We went big. It didn't work.
Lets be more pragmatic and close some small deals we can announce.
Bring back PvdM. It was a lot more fun.
 
  • Sad
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

alwaysgreen

Top 20
  • Fire
Reactions: 1 users
I wish!!!
We went big. It didn't work.
Lets be more pragmatic and close some small deals we can announce.
Bring back PvdM. It was a lot more fun.
I'd definitely love to hear more from pvdm when he speaks I always fall into some sort of hypnotic trance.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 4 users

Iseki

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Iseki

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

BaconLover

Founding Member
So is there any eco-system-partner we can expect anything from under 6 months, do you think?
We got Renesas and Megachips in a flash.

So yeah, this is possible. We can expect anything under 6 months.
Mainly because some of those have been working with Brainchip for a while already before they officially announced partnership.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 21 users

Evermont

Stealth Mode
Sean is running a strategy masterclass, the company has never been better placed. Just watch. ❤️
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 60 users
Top Bottom