D
Deleted member 118
Guest
Hi FF.
I know you have been quite strong with your opinion on how much weight an ASX announcement such as Ford being an EAP and if they were no longer an EAP, we would need to be advised if they were no longer an EAP through another Price sensitive announcement. Otherwise, it would be considered deception by Brainchip and potentially legal action could be taken against them. Forgive me if I have put words in your mouth but I recall you saying something to that effect.
In saying that, a statement such as “(Akida) WILL be the computational foundation of smart sensing in all edge devices.” is extremely strong in its language and I assume, extremely intentional. How much weight does a statement like this hold? If we do not become the foundation (or things change and it looks like we won't be), is there any grounds for legal action? If they do not believe we will become this foundation at some point, should they be advising the change of their opinion? Because based on that statement, investing in Brainchip is a (pardon the pun) no brainer!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5c97/a5c979f1f3e3a2fe462356560d548bb5d04f6d0a" alt="www.reuters.com"
Ford posts loss, takes sharp turn away from automated driving
Ford Motor Co on Wednesday reported a third-quarter net loss driven by its decision to shift spending from the Argo AI self-driving business.
Chief Executive Jim Farley on Wednesday said Ford will shift its development focus away from fully self-driving systems developed by Argo to advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) created internally at Ford. Such systems are partially automated but still require humans to stay engaged when a vehicle is moving.
Profitable, fully autonomous vehicles at scale are a long way off and we won’t necessarily have to create that technology ourselves," Farley said in a statement.