Quercuskid
Regular
Strange to hear factfinder becoming negative on brainchip, or am I reading this wrongly? A spot disconcerting
I agree, the percentages of improvement quoted by Qualcomm were mostly in the range of < 100% which as Sean stated at the AGM is not likely the kind of improvement one would obtain if Akida were involved - not in the orders of magnitude. Whilst Qualcomms presentation was impressive it smelled to me like the are squeezing the Von Neumann rag completely dry. AIMO.Morning from west europe to all.
In perspective from yesterdays presentation of the snapdragon 8 gen 2 my conclusion until now is, that Akida IP is not included because of the energy savings told yesterday. As I learned from @TECH, Akida IP energyconsumption deals between 1/1000-1/1.000.000 Watt. If Akida IP would be in this new version of snapdragon, I think the energy savings would be much higher. Maybe qualcomm needs a lot of time to realize that?
So I have to wait for more exciting news than yesterday.
Further to this post I have found the following which casts doubt on the significance of these names being mentioned:
His account has been taken over by sharemanStrange to hear factfinder becoming negative on brainchip, or am I reading this wrongly? A spot disconcerting
You could be right or he has fallen into a depression, either way its a worryHis account has been taken over by shareman![]()
One of the things experience teaches is that when you go pig shooting it is very dangerous to shoot at every movement in the undergrowth.Strange to hear factfinder becoming negative on brainchip, or am I reading this wrongly? A spot disconcerting
••• - - - •••One of the things experience teaches is that when you go pig shooting it is very dangerous to shoot at every movement in the undergrowth.
If you do you are likely to end up shooting your dog or worse still one of your drunk mates who was crawling around looking for his shot gun cartridges that fell out of his pocket.
While I am great fan of dot joining as it has and will lead to great reveals such as NASA has been there is an increasing tendency to elevate the first dot to fact immediately without any research.
This approach does no one any good. It just frays emotions by constantly creating false expectations and let downs over and over again.
In the child’s game dot to dot one dot does not make a picture of a panda or any other cute animal it is just a dot.
To work and reveal an animal every dot needs to be found and joined up in the correct order.
So if you want to see this as being negative so be it but one dot is not a fact.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
However, if just a nothing to see here, move along, can be explained away easily, why would the company amend the job ad so quick after no doubt being alerted to its discovery.Hi @Fact Finder,
Yes, and I also think its very interesting that all three of these companies are listed in the EDA Alliance as current partners of Intel Foundry Services (IFS) Accelerator ECOSYSTEM.
EDA = Electronic Design Automation (EDA) suppliers.
Just a happy co-incidence I guess.
View attachment 22299
No SOS required I believe. Just a yacht for us to mingle••• - - - •••
I never said that. My response was to the first reaction of another poster who stated do we even need an announcement.However, if just a nothing to see here, move along, can be explained away easily, why would the company amend the job ad so quick after no doubt being alerted to its discovery.
To those that follow the story, that do the research and dot joining the info is out there and seen and screenshot.
For thos that don't, would they care if it's in the job description?
Ha, that's funny8n
I see remorse in your comment...![]()
Very weird, was discussing these 3 companies with my wife and then did a search on their net worth by using Google to type the search. So I found the net worth for each Siemens and Synopsis as separate searches then to my surprise the ‘Cadence Net Worth’ string appeared on the search bar? Has Siri been listening to my conversation with my wife? Very weird. Anyway the networths of each totals more than 200 billionAbsolutely!! Robj.... normally we will just see the 'job description' but this actually mentions the Companies Wow!
- The role would include functional verification of the IP solution of Siemens/Synopsys/Cadence.
![]()
Ummm ...I replied to Bravo's post not yours so not sure of the defensive posture as if I accused you of saying something.I never said that. My response was to the first reaction of another poster who stated do we even need an announcement.
The fact that you can ask ‘why’ is what I am talking about.
When the ‘why’ is answered then it will become a fact and not before.
You I am sure have read new posters say things like “I thought we were working with “X” what happened to that deal?”
They are asking the question because they read a couple of early posts claiming the definite which was a few posts further on no longer a definite.
All the rubbish about Samsung Snapdragon 8 was just that rubbish. Anyone who has been researching Samsung over the last several months knew that, even this old technophobe knew it, but so many posts were claiming it as definite ignoring all the facts showing it could not possibly be in this model.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Possibly to discourage or not fuel anymore unsubstantiated speculative dot joining being misconstrued as fact until proven?However, if just a nothing to see here, move along, can be explained away easily, why would the company amend the job ad so quick after no doubt being alerted to its discovery.
To those that follow the story, that do the research and dot joining the info is out there and seen and screenshot.
For thos that don't, would they care if it's in the job description?