Fact Finder
Top 20
Hi JK200SXI'm curious.
MB initially mentioned AKIDA being in the EQXX concept back in January. Since then theirs been little to no word. Now, 10 months later they explicitely mention the use of AI in a production vehicle. I don't recall MB having mentioned anyone other than Brainchip when it comes to AI, and the repeated analyses and dot joining on this forum have managed to discount perhaps most/all of our competitors having the necessary technology, ie similar to AKIDA.
I posted the above this morning and I'm quite surprised that very few people have commented positively on the mention of AI powered systems in the vehicle. Why do people think that this may not be the case? Does it come down to Brainchip not release a price sensitive ann on this topic? Perhaps based on NDA's other agreements this is not something they need to release as an ann, etc?
We've managed to join dots that the CIA would be proud of us, yet why do we perhaps think otherwise with this?
My personal problem is that the use of Ai in the absence of SNN can mean just about any technology the way this term has been abused by the tech world.
I am not saying it isn’t AKIDA but every single company that Mercedes Benz uses abuses the use of the term Ai.
Even Brembo claim their brakes are intelligent.
So common place is its use that they have had to invent the AGI term to separate truly intelligent technology from toasters with a sensor that detect toast is burning and turn off.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA