Quatrojos
Regular
It could be coincidental but Vorago Tech appears, as an exhibitor in 2022, at the same booth owned by Telstar:
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Stable Genius
Regular
Thank’s TG.Sorry to hear about your friend SG, my thought’s are with you, very sad
To clarify. Only posted about my friend to remind people that life’s short. If you’re kinder to each other you’ll enjoy it more: karma!
We’ve probably all been touched by cancer. Nanose was a key interest in my investing. The lives it can help/save with early diagnosis and selfishly the money I can make with the investment.
When Nanose is released, which should be this year, the current SP will be long forgotten!
Quatrojos
Regular
Space tech happens in a different place each year. It's not an old booth page from a prior year!
Fact Finder
Top 20
Hi zeeb0t
Old guy question. On my screen over the last several days next to like first appeared the word 'gift' now in its place 'Tip'. Can you explain what this is all about please? FF
Old guy question. On my screen over the last several days next to like first appeared the word 'gift' now in its place 'Tip'. Can you explain what this is all about please? FF
Quatrojos
Regular
I just threw the vorago space tech 2022 thing onto HC...
This appeared last night, and was 'Gift' while I configured this new addition. So, henceforth known as 'Tip' - you can now issue a Tip (real cash value) to the person who wrote some amazing content. It's a way of giving a cash Kudos to someone. Click Tip and you'll find out more.
Jefwilto
Regular
Thats a good Article Stock,heres a recent Article from Arm,I,m not saying we are in their new “mali” IP but its possible though,the last sentence of the last paragraph is pertinent to our tech Akida i thinkSorry, if it has been posted before:
https: //venturebeat.com/2022/02/20/jensen-huang-interview-nvidias-post-arm-strategy-omniverse-and-self-driving-cars/
"
VentureBeat: What is your post-Arm strategy? Do you have to communicate your strategic direction in light of [the Arm deal being called off]?
Jensen Huang: Not really anything. Because we never finished combining with Arm. So any strategies that would have come from the combination were never talked about. And so our strategy is exactly the same. We do accelerated computing for wherever there are CPUs (central processing units) . And so we’ll do that for x86. And we’ll do we do that for Arm. We have a whole bunch of ARM CPUs, and system-on-chips (SoCs) in development. And we’re enthusiasts. We do all that. We have a 20-year license to Arm’s intellectual property. And we’ll continue to take advantage of all that and all the markets. And that’s about it. Keep building CPUs, GPUs (graphics processing units), and DPUs (data processing units). "
.....
"
VB: And how are you viewing progress on the metaverse? It seems like everybody’s a lot more excited about the metaverse, and the Omniverse is always part of that conversation.
Huang: Let’s see. Omniverse for enterprise is being trialed and being tested in about 700 or so different companies around the world. We have entered into some major licenses already. And so our numbers are off to a great start. People are using it for all kinds of things. They’re using it for connecting designers and creators. They’re using it to simulate logistics warehouses, simulate factories. They’re using it for synthetic data generation because we simulate sensors physically and accurately. You could use it for simulating data for training AIs that are collected from LiDAR, radars, and of course cameras. And so they’re using it for the simulation part of the software development process. You need to validate software as part of the release process. And you can put Omniverse in the flow of robotics application validation. People are using it for digital twins, too.
"
....
"
And I think there will be thousands and thousands of applications of autonomous vehicles, and it’s a sure thing. This year is going to be the inflection year for us on autonomous driving. This will be a big year for us. And then next year, it’ll be even bigger next year. And in 2025, that’s when we deploy our own software where we do revenue sharing with the car companies.
And so if the license was $10,000, we shared 50-50. If it’s a subscription base of $1,000 or $100 a month, we share 50-50. I think I’m pretty certain now that autonomous vehicles will be one of our largest businesses.
"
Arm introduces new automotive image signal processor to advance adoption of driver assistance and automation technologies
To enable new capabilities in ADAS and autonomous driving, the industry will need a new approach to image processing, and to address this, we have added the Mali-C78AE ISP to our portfolio of IP specifically developed to meet the performance and safety needs of automotive applications.
Fact Finder
Top 20
Now if anyone thinks the Edge is not being taken seriously by DARPA think again:
Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)
77 reviews
United States
Organization
Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)
Reference Code
ICPD-2022-37
How to Apply
Create and release your Profile on Zintellect – Postdoctoral applicants must create an account and complete a profile in the on-line application system. Please note: your resume/CV may not exceed 2 pages.
Complete your application – Enter the rest of the information required for the IC Postdoc Program Research Opportunity. The application itself contains detailed instructions for each one of these components: availability, citizenship, transcripts, dissertation abstract, publication and presentation plan, and information about your Research Advisor co-applicant.
Additional information about the IC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program is available on the program website located at:
https://orise.orau.gov/icpostdoc/index.html.
If you have questions, send an email to ICPostdoc@orau.org. Please include the reference code for this opportunity in your email.
Application Deadline
2/28/2022 6:00:00 PM Eastern Time Zone
Description
Research Topic Description, including Problem Statement:
With machine learning advances in hardware and software being powered by strong commercial interest and consumer awareness of data security/privacy it is becoming more practical to deploy trained models to the edge of a system on low power devices to filter information, make decisions and provide context to data before it is aggregated on back-end systems
Neural networks are benefiting from advances in core principles, software libraries and optimized hardware to run them making an eco-system that is moving quickly but still relatively immature in terms of its success deploying solutions to “production”.
What threats and opportunities does using neural networks at the edge of a system present? I.e., how could somebody affect a system that has a neural network as a component, either to defeat, deceive or coerce the system?
Other thoughts for steer are:
One approach could be to consider the neural network as an isolated “black box” component and affect the inputs in a way that is imperceptible to human eyes but can change the output in some way, there is previous work in this field of deceiving neural networks and in some ways the approach can be considered similar to a GAN based approach trying to create one network that can fool another.
Related to the previous approach would be the “white box” approach where the internals of the neural network are known and the attacks focuses on replacing/changing the network to alter its outputs while maintaining enough of its behavior to limit detection.
Another approach would be to consider specialized hardware that may be used to run inference on and how that could be interfered with to affect the performance of the system. CPU security has received some attention and improvement with issues like Spectre and Meltdown receiving media attention. Attacks focused on information leaking during transfer (see:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8715004) in CPUs are common but are TPUs different? How about neural networks deployed to FPGAs? Will neuromorphic hardware be free from those issues given it doesn’t separate memory and storage or will it have a new set of unique issues?
When systems contain sensors without processing at the edge security often focuses on validating the input signals, establishing trust in the hardware/software and looking for “normal” data being received based on historic data. Are there opportunities to build consensus between sensors on events when they can all apply context and describe the event e.g., a person is there because I can see them and hear them? – Can this be used to increase trust in the individual devices and spot disruption?
Relevance to the Intelligence Community:
The IC needs to understand the threats and opportunities when creating distributed sensor networks that have intelligence and business logic spread across the system. Specifically, the security considerations of using neural networks as components but more broadly their use on the system in terms of trust and threats. For example a CCTV network or a building management system.
Key Words: Cybersecurity, Neural Networks, Edge, IoT, Machine Learning
Qualifications
Oak Ridge Associated Universities
30+ days ago
Threat Model Considerations in Systems that Use Neural Networks at the Edge
77 reviews
United States
Indeed's salary guide
- Not provided by employer
- $27.1K to $34.3K per year is Indeed's estimated salary for model in United States.
Organization
Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)
Reference Code
ICPD-2022-37
How to Apply
Create and release your Profile on Zintellect – Postdoctoral applicants must create an account and complete a profile in the on-line application system. Please note: your resume/CV may not exceed 2 pages.
Complete your application – Enter the rest of the information required for the IC Postdoc Program Research Opportunity. The application itself contains detailed instructions for each one of these components: availability, citizenship, transcripts, dissertation abstract, publication and presentation plan, and information about your Research Advisor co-applicant.
Additional information about the IC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program is available on the program website located at:
If you have questions, send an email to ICPostdoc@orau.org. Please include the reference code for this opportunity in your email.
Application Deadline
2/28/2022 6:00:00 PM Eastern Time Zone
Description
Research Topic Description, including Problem Statement:
With machine learning advances in hardware and software being powered by strong commercial interest and consumer awareness of data security/privacy it is becoming more practical to deploy trained models to the edge of a system on low power devices to filter information, make decisions and provide context to data before it is aggregated on back-end systems
Neural networks are benefiting from advances in core principles, software libraries and optimized hardware to run them making an eco-system that is moving quickly but still relatively immature in terms of its success deploying solutions to “production”.
What threats and opportunities does using neural networks at the edge of a system present? I.e., how could somebody affect a system that has a neural network as a component, either to defeat, deceive or coerce the system?
Other thoughts for steer are:
- What new attack vectors are there in a system that uses a neural network on an edge device?
- We consider “edge” devices to be low power sensors to small servers with a preference for the sensor end, potentially with specific hardware optimized for running neural networks (TPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, Neuromorphic chips).
- Consider what information may change an adversary’s approach, e.g., if you knew the hardware, firmware, software, model deployed, training dataset, validation dataset etc.
- Consider the cost of each attack option vs the reward/impact (disruption, disable, data breach etc.)
One approach could be to consider the neural network as an isolated “black box” component and affect the inputs in a way that is imperceptible to human eyes but can change the output in some way, there is previous work in this field of deceiving neural networks and in some ways the approach can be considered similar to a GAN based approach trying to create one network that can fool another.
Related to the previous approach would be the “white box” approach where the internals of the neural network are known and the attacks focuses on replacing/changing the network to alter its outputs while maintaining enough of its behavior to limit detection.
Another approach would be to consider specialized hardware that may be used to run inference on and how that could be interfered with to affect the performance of the system. CPU security has received some attention and improvement with issues like Spectre and Meltdown receiving media attention. Attacks focused on information leaking during transfer (see:
When systems contain sensors without processing at the edge security often focuses on validating the input signals, establishing trust in the hardware/software and looking for “normal” data being received based on historic data. Are there opportunities to build consensus between sensors on events when they can all apply context and describe the event e.g., a person is there because I can see them and hear them? – Can this be used to increase trust in the individual devices and spot disruption?
Relevance to the Intelligence Community:
The IC needs to understand the threats and opportunities when creating distributed sensor networks that have intelligence and business logic spread across the system. Specifically, the security considerations of using neural networks as components but more broadly their use on the system in terms of trust and threats. For example a CCTV network or a building management system.
Key Words: Cybersecurity, Neural Networks, Edge, IoT, Machine Learning
Qualifications
Postdoc Eligibility
- U.S. citizens only
- Ph.D. in a relevant field must be completed before beginning the appointment and within five years of the application deadline
- Proposal must be associated with an accredited U.S. university, college, or U.S. government laboratory
- Eligible candidates may only receive one award from the IC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program
Research Advisor Eligibility
- Must be an employee of an accredited U.S. university, college or U.S. government laboratory
- Are not required to be U.S. citizens
- Citizenship: U.S. Citizen Only
- Degree: Doctoral Degree.
- Discipline(s):
- Communications and Graphics Design
- Computer, Information, and Data Sciences
- Earth and Geosciences
- Engineering
- Environmental and Marine Sciences
- Life Health and Medical Sciences
- Mathematics and Statistics
- Other Non-S&E
- Other Physical Sciences
- Other S&E-Related
- Physics
- Social and Behavioral Sciences
Oak Ridge Associated Universities
30+ days ago
dollarsandcents
Emerged
Good morning SC- very sorry about your friend. I enjoyed and endorse your comments relating to this forum
Stay safe and take care
I’ve been exited about the upcoming F1 season for more reason than one. The cars have been unveiled over the last week or so and I believe there are a few more to come. But what excites me is the names there’s Mercedes, Dell, Qualcomm, cognizant and the benefit of Akida to these brands never ceases to amaze me. Two things that stand out to me are the focus on weight and power consumption used by the cars as well as vibration monitoring.
Last edited:
TechGirl
Founding Member
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Hi Em,
I agree, it's very exciting since we know for certain that Mercedes' Formula 1 engineers have worked with with Akida as a result of the collaborative work that saw the EQXX come to fruition.
Extract 1
A new digitally-led design and engineering process saw the EQXX go from idea to road ready in just 18 months, bringing together expertise from the company’s Formula 1 and Formula E race engineering groups, its research department and prototyping specialists, and the production development team.
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQXX: Reinventing the electric car
The Vision EQXX may well prove one of the most consequential concept cars of the early 21st century
Last edited:
Fact Finder
Top 20
The market is quite boring really. I love the research and knowledge shared here otherwise I think I would just go and do up a few chairs for my wife. However with the fragility of life being mentioned today by Stable Genius I thought I would share this for older forum members with whom I share a common bond ie closer to the end than the beginning. LOL
Recently as you know I had to have an urgent surgical intervention for what turned out to be a collapsed bypass from 2012 causing the bottom of my heart to complain when not receiving appropriate blood supply. My symptoms have always been atypical.
My first was a chest tightness while listening to my wife talk about her very recent heart attack and stenting. Normally I would have called it stress and moved on. That would have been a mistake but I decided to see my GP. Probably my wife's heart attack spooked me enough to take notice. He said it was likely stress as my BP and ECG were both normal. He looked at when I had last had a stress test and it was a couple of years over due so off to the cardiologist.
Three months later at my non urgent appointment the cardiologist gets the same results BP and ECG and agrees probably stress reaction but listens with stethoscope for a very long time and says he thinks I might have a slight valve noise so rather than a stress test decides to send me for a scan of the heart with contrast.
I go back he says some minor blockages but not really significant only real way to confirm is an angiogram, probably could just medicate, but to be safe. After angiogram told I cannot leave until cardiologist sees me to discuss his findings. His words "Do you want the good news or the bad news?" Bad news please. "You have one vessel 100% blocked and two 80 to 90 percent blocked." What's the good news then "We found it. This is very serious." It all becomes urgent. LOL
So first warning to my cohort do not ignore even a one off symptom.
Most recent episode. Again if I was working physically I would feel a bit off. If I was bent over working say pulling weeds or sanding a piece of furniture I would feel breathless. I went to GP and exactly the same story. Everything normal. Sent back to cardiologist. Everything normal again. Been a while since last stress echo so that is scheduled non urgent and on Monday before Christmas I hit the treadmill and onto the bed to have the ultra sound of the heart.
Cardiologist is quite impressed apparently saying things like "Did you see that?" "Wow, did you see that?" "I don't like the look of that." "Wow." etc, etc, etc for about 10 minutes completely ignoring my presence in the room before turning to me and saying "I don't like the look of what the bottom half of your heart is doing. I suppose you know what I am going to say etc, etc. Three days later in hospital and they find that one of the bypasses had failed and they put multiple stents into the vessel to restore blood flow.
So second warning to my cohort do not ignore symptoms just because the preliminary results like blood pressure and ECG's are coming back fine.
By the way during all of the above I continued with my normal activities of renovating houses. Moving very heavy furniture. Driving the tractor. The point being these symptoms were very minor but the causes were not.
Not relevant to your investments unless of course you want to enjoy the fruits of having invested in Brainchip. LOL
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Recently as you know I had to have an urgent surgical intervention for what turned out to be a collapsed bypass from 2012 causing the bottom of my heart to complain when not receiving appropriate blood supply. My symptoms have always been atypical.
My first was a chest tightness while listening to my wife talk about her very recent heart attack and stenting. Normally I would have called it stress and moved on. That would have been a mistake but I decided to see my GP. Probably my wife's heart attack spooked me enough to take notice. He said it was likely stress as my BP and ECG were both normal. He looked at when I had last had a stress test and it was a couple of years over due so off to the cardiologist.
Three months later at my non urgent appointment the cardiologist gets the same results BP and ECG and agrees probably stress reaction but listens with stethoscope for a very long time and says he thinks I might have a slight valve noise so rather than a stress test decides to send me for a scan of the heart with contrast.
I go back he says some minor blockages but not really significant only real way to confirm is an angiogram, probably could just medicate, but to be safe. After angiogram told I cannot leave until cardiologist sees me to discuss his findings. His words "Do you want the good news or the bad news?" Bad news please. "You have one vessel 100% blocked and two 80 to 90 percent blocked." What's the good news then "We found it. This is very serious." It all becomes urgent. LOL
So first warning to my cohort do not ignore even a one off symptom.
Most recent episode. Again if I was working physically I would feel a bit off. If I was bent over working say pulling weeds or sanding a piece of furniture I would feel breathless. I went to GP and exactly the same story. Everything normal. Sent back to cardiologist. Everything normal again. Been a while since last stress echo so that is scheduled non urgent and on Monday before Christmas I hit the treadmill and onto the bed to have the ultra sound of the heart.
Cardiologist is quite impressed apparently saying things like "Did you see that?" "Wow, did you see that?" "I don't like the look of that." "Wow." etc, etc, etc for about 10 minutes completely ignoring my presence in the room before turning to me and saying "I don't like the look of what the bottom half of your heart is doing. I suppose you know what I am going to say etc, etc. Three days later in hospital and they find that one of the bypasses had failed and they put multiple stents into the vessel to restore blood flow.
So second warning to my cohort do not ignore symptoms just because the preliminary results like blood pressure and ECG's are coming back fine.
By the way during all of the above I continued with my normal activities of renovating houses. Moving very heavy furniture. Driving the tractor. The point being these symptoms were very minor but the causes were not.
Not relevant to your investments unless of course you want to enjoy the fruits of having invested in Brainchip. LOL
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
TechGirl
Founding Member
I am soooooooo glad you are still with us FF, it's so important to keep pushing your doctors if something is a little off, no one knows their body better than you
Build-it
Regular
Hi Tech Girl,
The 1000 eyes collaborating as 1 collective providing snippets and potential nuggets that can be continually followed is brilliant to watch.
It certainly is interesting with the 'Likes' back and forward between BRN & Qualcomm.
The ferrari thing is, I believe in the car world they say A real head turner.
Edge compute.
Fact Finder
Top 20
Thanks for that thought. It is actually quite easy to push your doctors into testing you. Thanks to lawyers they are all worried about being sued. LOL I think the hardest person to push is yourself faced with the Doctor saying it looks OK. Please make sure you ALWAYS leave the doctor comfortable with the outcome from your own perspective. FFI am soooooooo glad you are still with us FF, it's so important to keep pushing your doctors if something is a little off, no one knows their body better than you
I
Ilovepie
Guest
Hello a noob investor here.
I just made and account just because of the positivity in this forum and ofcourse because of Factfinder.
I see a tendency between investors who are feared by the red numbers. You guys should understand that its the whole market that is moving and not just brainchip. The fundamentals havent changed and we are just getting startet. This is the future. A recent poster wrote that Mercedes wont take a risk if they werent sure about the Technology and that is absolutely RIGHT. I think the companies who are in the EAP are developing products with that i mean is Sean cant just announce something that would end Up being a pump and dump. Things take time. Nothing fundemental has changed. Sorry for my bad English lol
AKIDA BALLISTA
I just made and account just because of the positivity in this forum and ofcourse because of Factfinder.
I see a tendency between investors who are feared by the red numbers. You guys should understand that its the whole market that is moving and not just brainchip. The fundamentals havent changed and we are just getting startet. This is the future. A recent poster wrote that Mercedes wont take a risk if they werent sure about the Technology and that is absolutely RIGHT. I think the companies who are in the EAP are developing products with that i mean is Sean cant just announce something that would end Up being a pump and dump. Things take time. Nothing fundemental has changed. Sorry for my bad English lol
AKIDA BALLISTA
Similar threads
