Something I have been puzzling.
I found the Vorago NASA successful Phase 1 notice and posted it here on
Saturday 2 July, 2022 at a bit after 9am.
Out of the blue Motley Fool and James Mickelborro publish a very negative article on
Sunday, 3 July, 2022 about Brainchip and particularly targeted NASA and put a link to a NASA payment page from late December, 2020 early 2021 and claimed there had been absolutely nothing from NASA since and it was clearly dead in the water.
The article claims that Brainchip was talking up NASA yet having looked my recollection is confirmed that NASA though mentioned has taken a back seat to Mercedes Benz, SiFive, ARM, Edge Impulse, Nviso, MegaChips, Renesas and Prophesse for many months now.
In short is there a connection and is that connection shorthand for 'shit we better close out our positions as we did not see that one coming' before this NASA information gets out.
This was a reasonable reaction because Brainchip has stated they are locked down by NASA and not allowed to talk about what they are doing? It therefore stands to reason why they would bet on there being nothing about NASA released by Brainchip.
I most certainly never expected to find this document and find out that Vorago has modelled the use of AKIDA in the Rover and estimates it will increase its speed of operation by about 140 times to 20 kph the NASA targeted speed.
Sometimes when the duck waddles and quacks we should perhaps shoot it before it takes flight and can hide itself with the rest of the flock.
So is there a point to noting this post the event. Yes a few points in fact.
The first is others play a rigged game and if you join in it will end in tears for you.
Second you need to do your own research, do not trust the word of others and have a plan.
Thirdly, it might also prove the potential for positive research here to be something which others might view as capable of influencing the market. The 1,000 Eyes is perhaps influential.
Finally, meaningless negative posting assists those who would manipulate retail.
For the very reasons
@DingoBorat states I do not use stop losses and rely upon my alerts to stay on top of my various investments.
The use of stop losses is an individual decision but you need to be very careful as they were designed and programmed into the system by those who control the game and you might well be suspicious as to their motives when they maintain that allowing shorting is necessary to maintain liquidity because of the lack of volume on the ASX.
Remember they claim the same argument to support shorting on the largest markets in the world including the Nasdaq. They get to have it both ways and screamed like the proverbial when retail played their game against them last year in the USA.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA