BRN Discussion Ongoing

Esq.111

Fascinatingly Intuitive.
Evening Yak52,

Good to see you lurking about.

Just wondering, only if you have time, if you would be so kind to have a look at the below post and give us all your thoughts.

Posted / screen shot by Saap25.
Posted at 4:43pm Friday 1/7/2022.
Posted on page 993 in this thread.
Post no #19,851

All a little confusing to us mortals.

Thankyou in advance.

Regards,
Esq.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Slade

Top 20
I think we will get two announcements soon covering our IP being licensed to Moschip and Nviso.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 42 users

Slade

Top 20
Followed closely by ARM
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 27 users

Twing

Akida’s gambit
Was just sitting watching the evening news in NZ tonight and this story came on, nearly fell off my chair, may not be Akida but just made me realise how we are now starting to see similar examples of our tech reaching the market.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 20 users

Slymeat

Move on, nothing to see.

NASA SBIR 2022-I Solicitation | Proposal Summary

https://sbir.nasa.gov › sbir › SBIR-22-1-H6.22-2237.html

Not sure if posted already? NASA/Brainchip (working together! )

25 May 2022 — Numem proposes in Phase-I to create a interface system with MRAM which can connect with AKIDA Neuromorphic Processor from Brainchip to ...

Proposal Information


Proposal Number:
22-1- H6.22-2237


Subtopic Title:
Deep Neural Net and Neuromorphic Processors for In-Space Autonomy and Cognition


Proposal Title:
Neuromorphic Processor with radiation tolerant MRAM


ReRAM is much more appropriate, and has all the same advantages (just a little slower, but heaps cheaper) - especially if you want a SOC solution. Weebit Nano’s ReRAM is compatible, in manufacturing, so can be produced on the same wafer without re-tooling. Plug-and-play IP is where economies will be made and where the future will lie.

A solution requiring MRAM would require at least 2 chips as the manufacturing technologies are incompatible. MRAM requires quite exotic material layers and significant re-tooling for FABs to manufacture It. and as a result it is expensive, and always will be.

Don‘t get me wrong, MRAM is a magnificent technology and will have a place in the future, I just don‘t see it ever co-existing on any chip and hence never being developed as a SOC solution.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 8 users

Tothemoon24

Top 20
Get use to seeing this Chippers , going to be a huge 6 months
 

Attachments

  • BF5809FD-1BB6-4879-9400-8D72A3C9FCAF.png
    BF5809FD-1BB6-4879-9400-8D72A3C9FCAF.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 230
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 69 users

TechGirl

Founding Member
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 16 users

Saap25

Member
Afternoon Chippers,

Just got off the phone with nabtrade regarding the above...

Well, due to the fact I'm not a client of theirs the lass was reticent at first,
After a while she said the technical departmant had got back to her and the jist of it was that..

1, The trade had not originated in or through nab.

2, It was a Trade Match , , ie , same participants on both sides .

3, Aftermarket algorythems balancing out the flow / volumes.


*I then reminded her that it was ..
a negative trade for no price and on volume which far and away exceeds the entire stock ( listed, unlisted & options ) issued in the company by a vast margin.

The above reply from a nab technical person shows the little time spent actually looking at this trade , and giving a accurate response , I give up.

For anyone here that has a nab trading account, allegidly you may be able to speak directly with the technical department and receive a logical reply. Good luck.

The nab help desk person I spoke to was accommodating, yet was fed b.ll s.hite from those above.

Regards,
Esq.
Appreciate the follow up, thanks ! Maybe we can leave it there and let’s enjoy the BRN journey, the track is looking pretty green from hereon !
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users

TechGirl

Founding Member
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 29 users

Sirod69

bavarian girl ;-)
what a great day, now we have 12% GREEN

 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 16 users
Been a long time since these sort of numbers were showing at Commsec:

511 buyers for 5,134,280 units
152 sellers for 1,575,036 units

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 65 users

Esq.111

Fascinatingly Intuitive.
Been a long time since these sort of numbers were showing at Commsec:

511 buyers for 5,134,280 units
152 sellers for 1,575,036 units

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
Evening Fact Finder,

Certainly will be fun for the shorters trying to reduce their positions.

😃

Bring on a BIG SHORT SQUEEZE.

Regards,
Esq.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 35 users

JK200SX

Regular

 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 27 users
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

TasTroy77

Founding Member
Been a long time since these sort of numbers were showing at Commsec:

511 buyers for 5,134,280 units
152 sellers for 1,575,036 units

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
Like that song FF from the Doors "5 to 1 baby 1 in five - no shorter gets out alive " 🤣
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 15 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest



 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 7 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Reuben

Founding Member
Been a long time since these sort of numbers were showing at Commsec:

511 buyers for 5,134,280 units
152 sellers for 1,575,036 units

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
@Fact Finder when the next big announcement happens.. these numbers might seem to be petite.... it is only a matter of when.. DYOR.. just my thoughts
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 27 users
Version 1 dated 2021
Ahh was just a quick google I'll try find data sheet after dinner
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top Bottom