Skar
Regular
Walk away from 850Mt of Lithium, at surface with low impurities... I am seeing 10B USD thrown around in ICC/ICSD.it’s for us to fuck off with some cash, and no claims whatsoever to the tenements in Manono
Walk away from 850Mt of Lithium, at surface with low impurities... I am seeing 10B USD thrown around in ICC/ICSD.it’s for us to fuck off with some cash, and no claims whatsoever to the tenements in Manono
Mate, I would dearly love that to be the amount they give us to fuck off with too, don’t get me wrongWalk away from 850Mt of Lithium, at surface with low impurities... I am seeing 10B USD thrown around in ICC/ICSD.
I agree with this take. Call me naive but the kobold CEO has given us no real reason to be suspicious. Imagine you are the Kobold CEO. You go to AVZ with a number to fuck off. Number is accepted by the BOD. Next go to Felix. Say "hey we can circumvent all the bs and make kobold the owner of Manono south +exploration tenements etc." Kobold CEO is making damn sure the DRC won't pull a fast one. He wants reassurances that the money to AVZ isn't going too be wasted. Felix says okay. They do a deal to make it happen in warp speed. This requires CK to pull the levers. Involving CK is a disasteful but pragmatic solution to getting a ML fast.My 2c worth:
We have an agreement with KoBold that references a framework for how they will acquire Manono from us.
Despite understandable speculation, its plausible that their agreement with DRC is part of the framework agreed with AVZ.
If its not, then it's directly in contrast with the AVZ agreement and a great excuse for AVZ to continue negotiating with other potential buyers (which speculation on here seems to think there are).
I for one will assume the former. We are winning our legal cases, and KoBold gains nothing from acquiring an asset that comes bundled with a whole new set of legal actions. Especially when they have already publicly acknowledged our rights to the tenement.
KoBolds options here are not:
1. Screw AVZ over for a good deal.
2. Screw harder for an even good-er deal
It's:
1. Make an amicable agreement with both AVZ and DRC to acquire the lithium asset of the century,
2. FUCK OFF AND GO HOME WITH NOTHING.
I do not believe they intend to go home with nothing.
This is going to enrage people, and rightly so given the Australian Government has done absolutely nothing for us, but the company is going to have to pay tax on the KoBold payout. And then we're going to have to pay tax again. To trigger CGT discounts, and minimize tax it's should be a share buyback plus a franked dividend. Prepare yourselves, we are going to get fucked again, just the degree of lubrication used is going to depend on how the return of our money is structured.Say it's a cash payout, i.e. AVZ receives cash from Kobold for the stake in Manono project. Can that then distributed to SHs in a way that allows CGT discount benefit? Would assume if paid as dividend it would be taxed the same as standard income tax?
Would management doing a share buyback be something that allows shareholders to get the 50% CGT discount?
I am expecting that the Kobold payments to AVZ will come in stages as described in my post from Saturday. However, after the AVZ fair value terms are finalised, perhaps AVZ will relist on the ASX before AVZ returns funds to shareholders. This approach will mean that market forces can put a value on AVZ based on the expected future cash flow from Kobold to AVZ. In the case where the AVZ payment includes an equity tranche in Kobold shares, and with the possibility that Kobold becomes publicly listed in the future, I imagine that future AVZ investors will place a high value on this because the future for Kobold is bright.From Copilot ...
Key Timeline
Date Milestone Responsible Party 17 Jul 2025Agreement in Principle signed DRC / KoBold 31 Jul 2025
- KoBold submits final permit applications
- Valuation panel appointed
KoBold / AVZ 15 Aug 2025Valuation panel delivers fair-market report Independent Panel 31 Aug 2025Payment of first cash tranche (40 %) KoBold (via escrow) 15 Sep 2025Issuance of equity tranche (60 % in KoBold shares) KoBold ?Permit-Issuance Bonus paid (5 % of valuation) Kobold ?First-Discovery Bonus paid (10 % of valuation), Upon first resource announcement Kobold
Add kobold to the list Dave
No they are not, and your interpretation is unrealistic and pessimistic.So there you have it, direct from the board itself. KoBold is trying to do exactly what the Chinese did—cut us out and take the asset. The only difference is they’re smiling while they do it and wrapping it in geopolitical spin.
I don't read it the same way, IMO if that were the case it wouldn't state that AVZ is in continued discussions with Kobold (and other parties). To me it's just posturing reaffirming AVZ's strong legal position as it enters further discussions with these parties.So there you have it, direct from the board itself. KoBold is trying to do exactly what the Chinese did—cut us out and take the asset. The only difference is they’re smiling while they do it and wrapping it in geopolitical spin.
I think you and Jongo need to go back and re-read. We've reported KoBold to ICSID.I don't read it the same way, IMO if that were the case it wouldn't that AVZ is in continued discussions with Kobold (and other parties). To me it's just posturing affirming AVZ's strong legal position as it enters further discussions with these parties.
All IMO
That doesn't read well to me. Great that we got an announcement but it just doesn't have a good feel about it.