AVZ Discussion 2022

Hudnut

Regular
The problem I see with any bids from a consortium is Kobold positioning themselves as the chosen one with the snack eaters.
If there is any action required by Felix/DRC as part of this deal, then Kobold has a 2 year head start on the competition.
That is, if we aren't prepared to walk away and go full length ICSID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Xerof

Flaming 1967
Walk away from 850Mt of Lithium, at surface with low impurities... I am seeing 10B USD thrown around in ICC/ICSD.
Mate, I would dearly love that to be the amount they give us to fuck off with too, don’t get me wrong
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users
My 2c worth:

We have an agreement with KoBold that references a framework for how they will acquire Manono from us.

Despite understandable speculation, its plausible that their agreement with DRC is part of the framework agreed with AVZ.

If its not, then it's directly in contrast with the AVZ agreement and a great excuse for AVZ to continue negotiating with other potential buyers (which speculation on here seems to think there are).

I for one will assume the former. We are winning our legal cases, and KoBold gains nothing from acquiring an asset that comes bundled with a whole new set of legal actions. Especially when they have already publicly acknowledged our rights to the tenement.

KoBolds options here are not:
1. Screw AVZ over for a good deal.
2. Screw harder for an even good-er deal

It's:
1. Make an amicable agreement with both AVZ and DRC to acquire the lithium asset of the century,
2. FUCK OFF AND GO HOME WITH NOTHING.

I do not believe they intend to go home with nothing.
I agree with this take. Call me naive but the kobold CEO has given us no real reason to be suspicious. Imagine you are the Kobold CEO. You go to AVZ with a number to fuck off. Number is accepted by the BOD. Next go to Felix. Say "hey we can circumvent all the bs and make kobold the owner of Manono south +exploration tenements etc." Kobold CEO is making damn sure the DRC won't pull a fast one. He wants reassurances that the money to AVZ isn't going too be wasted. Felix says okay. They do a deal to make it happen in warp speed. This requires CK to pull the levers. Involving CK is a disasteful but pragmatic solution to getting a ML fast. 🤷 Understandably AVZ shareholders are triggered and suspicious of his involvement but it's no reason to jump to conclusions. Imo cheers

Edit: This idea is from my general take on the kobold CEO. He seems far more concerned about locking a deal in fast/time than he is concerned about $. This works to our favour.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 24 users
Say it's a cash payout, i.e. AVZ receives cash from Kobold for the stake in Manono project. Can that then distributed to SHs in a way that allows CGT discount benefit? Would assume if paid as dividend it would be taxed the same as standard income tax?
Would management doing a share buyback be something that allows shareholders to get the 50% CGT discount?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 8 users

KentCStrait

Regular
Say it's a cash payout, i.e. AVZ receives cash from Kobold for the stake in Manono project. Can that then distributed to SHs in a way that allows CGT discount benefit? Would assume if paid as dividend it would be taxed the same as standard income tax?
Would management doing a share buyback be something that allows shareholders to get the 50% CGT discount?
This is going to enrage people, and rightly so given the Australian Government has done absolutely nothing for us, but the company is going to have to pay tax on the KoBold payout. And then we're going to have to pay tax again. To trigger CGT discounts, and minimize tax it's should be a share buyback plus a franked dividend. Prepare yourselves, we are going to get fucked again, just the degree of lubrication used is going to depend on how the return of our money is structured.

Also, even if the cash hits AVZ's account tomorrow, it's likely going to 6 months plus before we see a cent. ASIC and the ATO are going to want their say in it.
 
  • Thinking
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: 10 users
I really wish Kobold just buy out AVZ. That would be an easy CGT event.. Hopefully Nigel can persuade them to do so and perhaps some of the AVZ staff will stay on and work for Kobold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users

Mute22

Regular
1753064426074.png
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 19 users

Woogr

Regular
That doesn’t read like a deals done.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

KentCStrait

Regular
So there you have it, direct from the board itself. KoBold is trying to do exactly what the Chinese did—cut us out and take the asset. The only difference is they’re smiling while they do it and wrapping it in geopolitical spin.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Thinking
Reactions: 9 users

Jongo

Regular
From Copilot ...

Key Timeline
Date
Milestone
Responsible Party
17 Jul 2025​
Agreement in Principle signedDRC / KoBold
31 Jul 2025​
  • KoBold submits final permit applications
  • Valuation panel appointed
KoBold / AVZ
15 Aug 2025​
Valuation panel delivers fair-market reportIndependent Panel
31 Aug 2025​
Payment of first cash tranche (40 %)KoBold (via escrow)
15 Sep 2025​
Issuance of equity tranche (60 % in KoBold shares)KoBold
?​
Permit-Issuance Bonus paid (5 % of valuation)Kobold
?​
First-Discovery Bonus paid (10 % of valuation), Upon first resource announcementKobold
I am expecting that the Kobold payments to AVZ will come in stages as described in my post from Saturday. However, after the AVZ fair value terms are finalised, perhaps AVZ will relist on the ASX before AVZ returns funds to shareholders. This approach will mean that market forces can put a value on AVZ based on the expected future cash flow from Kobold to AVZ. In the case where the AVZ payment includes an equity tranche in Kobold shares, and with the possibility that Kobold becomes publicly listed in the future, I imagine that future AVZ investors will place a high value on this because the future for Kobold is bright.

If AVZ does relist on the ASX, then existing shareholders can choose to sell via the ASX and hence, be eligible for the CGT discount where applicable. Another advantage of this approach is that if the Kobold payments are subject to escrow terms, the existing AVZ shareholders will be able to realise part or all of their profit much sooner and take that long overdue holiday.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 7 users

Jongo

Regular
So there you have it, direct from the board itself. KoBold is trying to do exactly what the Chinese did—cut us out and take the asset. The only difference is they’re smiling while they do it and wrapping it in geopolitical spin.
No they are not, and your interpretation is unrealistic and pessimistic.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 24 users

Panther22

Regular
That doesn't read well to me. Great that we got an announcement but it just doesn't have a good feel about it OR is Kobold just getting it's house in order with DRC before our deal is completed?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 17 users
So there you have it, direct from the board itself. KoBold is trying to do exactly what the Chinese did—cut us out and take the asset. The only difference is they’re smiling while they do it and wrapping it in geopolitical spin.
I don't read it the same way, IMO if that were the case it wouldn't state that AVZ is in continued discussions with Kobold (and other parties). To me it's just posturing reaffirming AVZ's strong legal position as it enters further discussions with these parties.

All IMO
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 44 users

KentCStrait

Regular
I don't read it the same way, IMO if that were the case it wouldn't that AVZ is in continued discussions with Kobold (and other parties). To me it's just posturing affirming AVZ's strong legal position as it enters further discussions with these parties.

All IMO
I think you and Jongo need to go back and re-read. We've reported KoBold to ICSID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Surely Kobold wont ratfuck AVZ after signing a framework and publicly stating fair compensation?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Haha
Reactions: 14 users

Skar

Regular
That doesn't read well to me. Great that we got an announcement but it just doesn't have a good feel about it.

Is it applying pressure from both sides? AVZ and Kobold coming at the problem from different angles to get the project unstuck or are we getting shafted?

The DRC are certainly fragmented and built on various factions and [selfserving] interests, so maybe pressure from both sides ss what is needed and AVZ/Kobold are in good standing... if they are under enough pressure they have to make a deal so their problems go away.

I do wonder who the various parties are.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 8 users

BRICK

Where’s Zeebot 😶‍🌫️
Oh fucking joy town.

Everyone trying to fuck us.

Fuckem all go to court and dont spare the horses
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 12 users

hedrox

Regular
It sounds to me the biggest issue for AVZ is, that they get compensated for the lost northern part as well.
It's all about the $$$ now to find a settlement. The DRC is in breach of the interim orders, because they talk to Kobold to resolve the issues, instead of talking to AVZ.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 13 users

Dave Evans

Regular
08/05/2025

Yahoo Finance

Bloomberg
Bezos-Backed Firm Signs Deal to Advance Congo Lithium Mine

Bloomberg) -- KoBold Metals Co. has reached a preliminary agreement to move forward with the development of one of the world’s biggest hard rock lithium deposits in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The firm, backed by billionaires Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, reached a framework agreement with Australia’s AVZ Minerals Ltd. to buy the latter’s stake in project on the Manono deposit, according to a letter signed by KoBold Chief Executive Officer Kurt House and his AVZ counterpart Nigel Ferguson.

KoBold has proposed a plan that would see AVZ receive compensation, while Zijin continues developing a mine in the northern portion of the Manono deposit, according to another letter addressed to Tshisekedi’s office in January and seen by Bloomberg. Rio Tinto Group has also held talks with Congo and KoBold about investing in the project.

Michael Bloomberg, the majority owner of Bloomberg News’s parent Bloomberg LP, is an investor in Gates’ Breakthrough Energy, which holds a stake in KoBold, according to the company’s website.


09/05/2025

On May 6, 2025, KoBold and Australia’s AVZ Minerals issued a joint statement titled Developing Manono for Peace and Prosperity, signed by their CEOs, Kurt House and Nigel Ferguson.

The companies announced they had agreed on a commercial framework to expedite development of the Manono deposit.

According to the statement, “this framework provides for AVZ to cede its commercial interests in the Manono lithium deposit to KoBold, at fair value,” enabling KoBold to rapidly mobilize over $1 billion to bring Manono’s lithium to Western markets.



KoBold Metals and AVZ Agree on Framework for KoBold to Acquire AVZ’s Interests in the Manono Lithium Deposit in DRC​

Thanks, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, U.S. Senior Advisor for Africa Massad Boulos, and President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Félix A. Tshisekedi Tshilombo, for opening doors for US investment. KoBold Metals and AVZ Minerals Limited agreed on a framework for KoBold to buy AVZ’s interests in the Manono lithium deposit in the DRC. We’ll make America and the DRC safer, stronger, and more prosperous.

1746638855400-892x1024.jpeg




It would be a bit hard for KoBold to turn around and say their words can’t be trusted

IMG_9678.jpeg


IMG_9679.jpeg


BTW, I wouldn’t trust a word that comes out of cant see straight
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 41 users
Top Bottom