AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Dave Evans
Regular
Thanks for that information Carlos. I understand your position on the other matter but unless you can get the bosses of either RIO or BHP to run for our BOD I think we are safer taking a strategic approach and I would expect there would be cuts to directors across the board.
We saw Fat Tail try and roll our BOD last year and then one of them put a value of $0.01c on our shares and then immediately acquired 57 million of them.
I’m sure there are shareholders out there who have no idea of the corruption that’s taken place (and is still taking place) against us. Would you risk letting them vote someone on the BOD who only values the shares at $0.01c or someone backed by the CCP.
Actually Carlos, treat that as a rhetorical question, you’re posts are often even longer than mine and you’re one of the shareholders whose views I respect. At this stage I’m just looking to wind down and see what happens at the AGM.
My only real point is who do I trust more, Nigel who has had to fight this corruption for the last two and half years, has as much on the line as any shareholder and has a working relationship with DLA Piper or a blow in
Last edited:
Xerof
Have a Cigar 1975
Once again I’d like to make a suggestion about distribution of the ‘notes and impressions’ gained from attending the AGM. The last thing we want is all that info that might be released, being publicly available to all those listed on @Dave Evans post from earlier today.
I suggest those who are willing, share it by PM with those they already talk with in private on the forum, and in turn those who receive it will also have a cluster to pass on to.
I’d be happy to distribute privately on request, to take some of the load off those doing the write-ups
My reasoning behind this is that the BOD may still not wish to have any information shared with the bunch of non holders, cunts and sundry fuckwits with loose lips
Again, completely over to those attending, but…..
Wadayathink?
I suggest those who are willing, share it by PM with those they already talk with in private on the forum, and in turn those who receive it will also have a cluster to pass on to.
I’d be happy to distribute privately on request, to take some of the load off those doing the write-ups
My reasoning behind this is that the BOD may still not wish to have any information shared with the bunch of non holders, cunts and sundry fuckwits with loose lips
Again, completely over to those attending, but…..
Wadayathink?
Fat tail own 57m shares. You can bet your arse they'll be there anyway so the people you trying to keep the info from will already know the info. imoOnce again I’d like to make a suggestion about distribution of the ‘notes and impressions’ gained from attending the AGM. The last thing we want is all that info that might be released, being publicly available to all those listed on @Dave Evans post from earlier today.
I suggest those who are willing, share it by PM with those they already talk with in private on the forum, and in turn those who receive it will also have a cluster to pass on to.
I’d be happy to distribute privately on request, to take some of the load off those doing the write-ups
My reasoning behind this is that the BOD may still not wish to have any information shared with the bunch of non holders, cunts and sundry fuckwits with loose lips
Again, completely over to those attending, but…..
Wadayathink?
Prod
Member
Dave let's not forget CATL that 2 faced prick Mr PEI
Carlos Danger
Top 20
There’s no guarantee that any of our enemies would get on the board just because AVZ’s shareholders didn’t agree with how much management are paying themselves. In fact the current bod could all get back in after getting the message from the company’s owners that their remuneration is unacceptable. Taking that right to judge out of our hands especially when not telling us what the pay is at least 3 weeks before the agm as required under the corporations act is weak as fuck even in current circumstances imo
Nearly happened last year
BRICK
Top 20
i hate that carrot
cunt
Last edited:
Once again I’d like to make a suggestion about distribution of the ‘notes and impressions’ gained from attending the AGM. The last thing we want is all that info that might be released, being publicly available to all those listed on @Dave Evans post from earlier today.
I suggest those who are willing, share it by PM with those they already talk with in private on the forum, and in turn those who receive it will also have a cluster to pass on to.
I’d be happy to distribute privately on request, to take some of the load off those doing the write-ups
My reasoning behind this is that the BOD may still not wish to have any information shared with the bunch of non holders, cunts and sundry fuckwits with loose lips
Again, completely over to those attending, but…..
Wadayathink?
I think a private distribution list would result in either:
a) A very small number on the list, so most of us here would still be in the dark. I know I'm probably not in the inner circle, so will remain ignorant if that's the case.
b) A bigger list, with increased risk the info leaks to undesirables.
In either case, it wouldn't surprise me that any info we would be told would already be known to the enemy. That would include stuff they've been made aware of by their legal people (I'm thinking stuff like what happens at ICC if they don't pay arbitration fees, timing of next steps at ICC/ICSID, status of the escrow etc)
I doubt we'll be told anything that the company isn't prepared to have leaked, and I'd be disappointed if after the AGM people hanging out for information here are kept in the dark because they couldn't attend. Even if it was a redacted version.
For some reason (for me anyway) the announcements page on their website is down.
Perhaps they are updating it? Wishful thinking??
https://avzminerals.com.au/asx-announcements
Perhaps they are updating it? Wishful thinking??
https://avzminerals.com.au/asx-announcements
Your link doesn't work, but this one does:
Xerof
Have a Cigar 1975
Fair enough, it could be cumbersome so let’s let it all hang out Hombres
Hangin' from a pine tree by my knees
Sun is shinin' through the shade
Nobody knows what it's all about,
It's too much, man, let it all hang out
Dave Evans
Regular
I think the DRC and Zijin’s plan was for the DRC to lead us on by pretending to negotiate with us in Belgium, France and the DRC and then try and deny those meetings occurred, while Zijin kept stalling our arbitration with submissions and false claims in their combined effort to drain our funds
If Locke has agreed to fund our litigation against them then the DRC and Zijin might have to rethink their plans and negotiate with us, or with a third party with enough clout to negotiate a settlement with all parties involved
Similar threads
