Bin59
Regular
CAMI still up to their old games by the looks of itAgreed. The CAMI site also has the application date & approval date one day apart, back dated to October last year
View attachment 69428

CAMI still up to their old games by the looks of itAgreed. The CAMI site also has the application date & approval date one day apart, back dated to October last year
View attachment 69428
Every single time this reasoning has been brought up it has been proven wrong by reality on the groundDisregard anything seen on the cami portal it’s a load of shit
I think you took it literally, of course negotiations can take place at anytime, just depends whether it is to award rights and settle north or a financial payout for the whole lot. If the former breaks down, then it just comes down to going through the courts for the latter.Where does everyone get this idea that there will potentially be a moment where the bod decides to stop attempting negotiations
As far as I'm aware the ICSID allows deals during the entire process
If there ever comes a point where the bod hand everything over to the lawyers and say we aren't going to try anymore then they should all fucking resign imo
Agree, 15575 is proceeding as if it's kosher coz the ISCID would not make a finding as to its legality until it finalises all the prior shitfuckery.Every single time this reasoning has been brought up it has been proven wrong by reality on the ground
The idea that CAMI is rogue or Cominiere are bribing staff to update the website behind the MoM's back is pure copium
The words disadvantageous for the Republic blow up this argument quicker than a pager manufactured with explosive material imo
I remember 9card saying Fasken found a legal loophole around this. Which is reflected in the ICSID excluding the new north from the initial proceedings. Their assumption is that they will either win the old north dispute or get AVZ to fold either figuratively or literally before it needs to be decided so might as well get rolling.Agree, 15575 is proceeding as if it's kosher coz the ISCID would not make a finding as to its legality until it finalises all the prior shitfuckery.
#stolen #corruptionAgreed. The CAMI site also has the application date & approval date one day apart, back dated to October last year
View attachment 69428
Where does everyone get this idea that there will potentially be a moment where the bod decides to stop attempting negotiations
As far as I'm aware the ICSID allows deals during the entire process
If there ever comes a point where the bod hand everything over to the lawyers and say we aren't going to try anymore then they should all fucking resign imo
What a crock of shit. Carlos is one of those on here who consistently tell it how it is, with well-considered justifications for his positions. Given our circumstances are dire, these positions have invariably appeared negative in recent years. Amazing how that works when you take a realistic viewpoint.Carlos does seem to revel in $avz shareholders losing their entire fucking investments. Lucky he’s a self made millionaire legend
Agree, i have valued Carlos' input and his excellent analysis and interpretation of the current standing with ICC and ISCID.What a crock of shit. Carlos is one of those on here who consistently tell it how it is, with well-considered justifications for his positions. Given our circumstances are dire, these positions have invariably appeared negative in recent years. Amazing how that works when you take a realistic viewpoint.
You are always quick to shut down such views, but I wholeheartedly appreciate the inputs that Carlos and others put forward. Im sure many others feel the same way.
I think we'll likely glean more accurate insights through those like Carlos rather than listening to the pump squad on Twitter, that whilst positive and feel-good, has been wrong over and over again.
I wish you would try and be more positive in our fight against corruption Carlos
AVZ have always said they are willing to negotiate and continue to do so. Those in the DRC who are negotiating on their behalf have been leading us on, hoping we will run out of cash while in the meantime China continues to manipulate the lithium price so if they have to compensate us it would be at a lower price
What a crock of shit. Carlos is one of those on here who consistently tell it how it is, with well-considered justifications for his positions. Given our circumstances are dire, these positions have invariably appeared negative in recent years. Amazing how that works when you take a realistic viewpoint.
You are always quick to shut down such views, but I wholeheartedly appreciate the inputs that Carlos and others put forward. Im sure many others feel the same way.
I think we'll likely glean more accurate insights through those like Carlos rather than listening to the pump squad on Twitter, that whilst positive and feel-good, has been wrong over and over again.
My point was that negotiations will continue as long as necessary which is far more positive than saying the drawn out legal process is our last option as many have imoNo doubt Carlos knows his shit, seems he was right all along - just saying he seems to enjoy the fact we’re all fucked
Fair enough mate I can respect that, certainly looking as though DRC don’t give a shit about any arbitration courts and are pressing ahead. Have to wait and seeMy point was that negotiations will continue as long as necessary which is far more positive than saying the drawn out legal process is our last option as many have imo
I take absolutely zero joy in this situation. I find humour gets a message across quicker than any other communication method so perhaps that is where the confusion lies but my main motivation for researching is to try and help shareholders that are suffering understand the situation whether the information is palatable or not.
I’ve also been wrong about heaps of shit haha
View attachment 69456
ICSID decision is YEARS away lolLets just simply wait for the ICC and ICSID rulings - we have seen in the past that countries take the rulings of the ICSID very seriously and it is a catalyst for negotiation and settlement.
Just because you stole a car changed the wheels over and sold it to a mate (who knows the car is stolen) doesnt make the car your mates property. This is also the reason why we are litigating this primarily internationally rather than the corrupt domestic courts in the DRC.
Negative speculation until we know the rulings of both the ICSID and ICC - serves no purpose. You run the risk of feeding peoples anxiety which may trigger personal outcomes that none of us want to see or be responsible for through our musings.
We have no other option than to support the Board and each other.
Regards,
SilentOne