AVZ Discussion 2022

Soapy

Regular
Or...they take take their new offer and shove it up them! Don't give them a sniff now. The only issue is if they put forward a massive offer, we'll need to match it and perhaps go back to the well to pay for it.
Or...they take take their new offer and shove it up them! Don't give them a sniff now. The only issue is if they put forward a massive offer, we'll need to match it and perhaps go back to the well to pay for it.
I would not mind if they put forward a massive offer it will only increase our value and as someone previously posted they could really speed things up. Either way if it’s ours or they get it at a crazy price I’m not fussed. I see a win win all around. All in my humble opinion of course.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 9 users

tonster66

Regular
So is my understanding correct that we should be expecting an announcement tomorrow and the suspension should lifted !!!
Finally!!!
This is not why we are in suspension. We need the issues resolved with CAMI regarding the northern portion of the tenement. There has been nothing reported about this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26 users
This is not why we are in suspension. We need the issues resolved with CAMI regarding the northern portion of the tenement. There has been nothing reported about this.
So one piece of shit-fuckery may be on the verge of being resolved, with the shift-fuckery around the tenement boundaries yet to be resolved? Sounds like progress - I’ll take it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 29 users
Can’t believe that people even consider Zigin being on board after the corruption we’ve just gone through. It’s taken months of shareholders here and on other forums digging up and sharing information (along with the IGF) to counteract the corruption, not to mention the money it’s cost us to pay lawyers etc…. are some of you seriously suggesting having them on board WTF, some seem to have forgotten the hell all AVZ shareholders have gone through that’s been expressed here and on other forums. And don’t forget all the fake media releases those sus Chinese monkeys have passed on to the media companies like Bloomberg etc. There’s been recent information on new infrastructure proposals by Zambia and Tanzania with the DRC, what the fuck is wrong with those people even considering these fucken arseholes Zigin should get anything but fucked in the arse, f@*€ me
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 39 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Indeed, a new transparently negotiated deal might be to the benefit of all. Having Zinjin on board at clear and market valued terms could much help get this mine build in record time.
How the hell can you trust Zijin after what took place.
Why is the current minister of Portfolio, who accommodated this corrupt deal chairing the meeting like everything is honky dory??

Don't people including the minister understand that they are admitting that they operated in a corrupt way and should not be seen any way near Dathcom, Manono and Lithium?

Why accept an offer and become JV partners with a mob, who stated in their annual report that they would outmanoeuvre AVZ?
In my entire life I have never seen anything like this.

What a bunch of unbelievable idiots.

The 15% of Dathcom is not in an auction.
Zijin offered US$33 million, AVZ Made much more superior offer.

Nice try, just fuck off.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 51 users

JAG

Top 20
W

The DRC Battery Council: Building the sustainable battery supply chain of tomorrow​

2022-03-30 08:45:00

“The country’s mining sector currently accounts for 98% of exports, 18% of GDP and 11% of jobs. If the DRC captures 20% of the market share for battery production, it will add around US$54 billion to its income and raise its GDP tremendously,” says UN Under-Secretary-General Vera Songwe.

AVZ Minerals Ltd - The DRC Battery Council: Building the sustainable battery supply chain of tomorrow


Africa is a resource-rich continent, home to some 30% of the world’s known mineral reserves, including 40% of known gold and up to 90% of chromium and platinum reserves.

For centuries, this mineral wealth has been extracted by foreign nations or companies with very little value returned to the countries they are taken from, leaving Africa with little to gain from the global mineral supply chain.
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is seeking to change that unequal dynamic, taking the first steps to building a sustainable battery value chain within the DRC and greater Africa with the support of the new Democratic Republic of Congo Battery Council.

In this article: What is the DRC Battery Council? Who’s involved? Challenges to be overcome

What is the DRC Battery Council?​

The main objective of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s DRC-Africa Business Forum in 2021 was to foster “the development of a battery, electric vehicle and renewable energy value chain and market in Africa”.

The DRC-Africa Business Forum – after two hours of roundtable debate – brought together high-level stakeholders to form the Democratic Republic of Congo’s Battery Council with three strategic objectives:
Support value creation of strategic minerals in Africa and strengthen productive capabilities in the battery value chain, to generate job creation on the continent via the battery value chain; Ensure a socially, environmentally responsible and sustainable battery value chain, which improves the lives of women and the youth; and Encourage local and African champions to invest in the battery industry.

The council intends to set up a special financial vehicle to facilitate private investments and the participation of the population, and will also:

Leverage partnerships to attract and promote investment and innovation and technology for the transformation of Africa’s strategic minerals; Accelerate intra-African trade, skills building and research to unlock innovation along the battery value chain leveraging the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA); Collaborate to promote extensive partnerships and far-reaching exchanges of innovative ideas to ensure that the battery value chain is sustainable and accrues value to the local economy; Catalyse, fast-track and scale up action towards the vision; and Facilitate the generation of evidence-based studies, data, information on the battery value chain in the DRC and Africa.

The council’s goals have garnered support from the UN Economic Commission for Africa, which champions economic cooperation among its member states.

“The DRC is at the heart of the battery value chain, as it is home to about 70% of world's cobalt reserves,” UN Under-Secretary-General and executive secretary of the Economic Commission for Africa Vera Songwe said.

“The country’s mining sector currently accounts for 98% of exports, 18% of GDP and 11% of jobs.

“If the DRC captures 20% of the market share for battery production, it will add around US$54 billion to its income and raise its GDP tremendously.”

The head of state of the DRC and current chair of the African Union Commission (AU), Félix-Antoine Tshisekedi Tshilombo, also expressed his enthusiasm for the council to begin pursuing its goals: "The machine is now launched, it is necessary to start right after this forum."

Who’s involved?​

The key participants included representatives of Zambia, Tanzania and Morocco, the UN Economic Commission for Africa, African Union Commission and Afreximbank.
Other organisations included Africa Finance Cooperation, African Development Bank Group, Bosch Africa, The Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa, and AVZ Minerals Ltd (ASX:AVZ).

AVZ Minerals was the only aspiring mining company to be invited to the forum, which managing director Nigel Ferguson sees as a logical choice.

“We're sitting with one of the globally significant lithium and tin resources and the current geopolitical climate is gaining greater focus on green technology,” Ferguson said.

“The Australian Ambassador visited just recently and she said the DRC President, Felix Tshisekedi, was very keen on having more Australian companies come and do business in country because we've got a very good reputation for our technical expertise, our transparency and our professionalism.
“We also recognise the importance of having a local community that's realising benefit from a national asset.”

AVZ Minerals has built its brand on a near ‘zero emissions’ operation, with an independent greenhouse gas assessment confirming the Manono Lithium and Tin Project could have one of the lowest carbon footprints of any hard rock lithium mine in the world.

“The DRC and Africa are strategically positioned to play a pivotal role in the global transition to clean energy and decarbonisation and the Manono project will greatly assist to improve the fortunes of the Congolese people, which AVZ Minerals is very supportive (of),” Ferguson commented.

Challenges to be overcome​

There are many structural challenges to be overcome before the DRC Battery Council can meet its goals, not least of which is energy and transport infrastructure.
The DRC currently operates under a large electricity deficit, where once it supplied excess energy to its neighbours.

Secretary-General of EGC (General Cobalt Company) and energy expert Vincent-Noël Vika Raissa Kikunda said that overcoming this first hurdle was paramount, and “the country will have to invest a billion dollars each year to hope to solve its electricity problem”.

Secretary-General Vika highlights that without access to financing and sovereign guarantees, long-term energy purchase contracts may fill the gap.

DRC will also likely need a more robust rail network, potentially a large industrial port and greater integration of the local population into the electric battery industry.

The private sector will be integral to the upskilling of DRC citizens, a role AVZ Minerals is already engaged in.

The mining company has plans to build and fit-out a school at Manono, the local town adjacent to AVZ’s mining project, and also intends to draw on a large pool of extensive mining experience in the form of locally recruited on-the-job traineeships.

“Giving locals an opportunity to have a skill or a trade and uplift themselves is something that's very close to us,” Ferguson explained.
“The DRC is well endowed with not only natural mineral resources but also in their people. There’s a long history of mining in the country and many people are very technically capable.

“I'm absolutely comfortable with the fact that there's enough technical capacity here to be able to fulfil those roles.”

Ferguson also highlighted a need for political stability and regulatory flexibility across greater Africa, often cited as one of the major reasons the continent can be risky to invest in.

David McLachlan-Karr, the Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator of the UN in DRC, commented that the Congo has the capacity to change the distribution of benefits from the green mineral value chains.

“Investors believe in this project and are involved. The work will be very complex, requiring a focused approach,” McLachlan-Karr said.

“Investing in this sector in DRC won’t just yield financial returns, but will be vital for the global reaching of the Paris agreement, and improving lives in DRC.”

Not the same Maya? 🤔
How the hell can you trust Zijin after what took place.
Why is the current minister of Portfolio, who accommodated this corrupt deal chairing the meeting like everything is honky dory??

Don't people including the minister understand that they are admitting that they operated in a corrupt way and should not be seen any way near Dathcom, Manono and Lithium?

Why accept an offer and become JV partners with a mob, who stated in their annual report that they would outmanoeuvre AVZ?
In my entire life I have never seen anything like this.

What a bunch of unbelievable idiots.

The 15% of Dathcom is not in an auction.
Zijin offered US$33 million, AVZ Made much more superior offer.

Nice try, just fuck off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

JAG

Top 20
Well well well….. hmmmm. Very interesting……
Who cares right now!!!!! Not me, Pies win by 1 and I’m magotted at the shack… we did it Frank, Top 4 and a second chance.. bring on next week!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 22 users

cruiser51

Top 20
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

whales

Regular
How the hell can you trust Zijin after what took place.
Why is the current minister of Portfolio, who accommodated this corrupt deal chairing the meeting like everything is honky dory??

Don't people including the minister understand that they are admitting that they operated in a corrupt way and should not be seen any way near Dathcom, Manono and Lithium?

Why accept an offer and become JV partners with a mob, who stated in their annual report that they would outmanoeuvre AVZ?
In my entire life I have never seen anything like this.

What a bunch of unbelievable idiots.

The 15% of Dathcom is not in an auction.
Zijin offered US$33 million, AVZ Made much more superior offer.

Nice try, just fuck off.
Zijin and the Princess not to be trusted.
More like Chinese saving face to retain current operation in DRC and Minister to avoid a serious jail time.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 22 users

tonster66

Regular
Can’t believe that people even consider Zigin being on board after the corruption we’ve just gone through. It’s taken months of shareholders here and on other forums digging up and sharing information (along with the IGF) to counteract the corruption, not to mention the money it’s cost us to pay lawyers etc…. are some of you seriously suggesting having them on board WTF, some seem to have forgotten the hell all AVZ shareholders have gone through that’s been expressed here and on other forums. And don’t forget all the fake media releases those sus Chinese monkeys have passed on to the media companies like Bloomberg etc. There’s been recent information on new infrastructure proposals by Zambia and Tanzania with the DRC, what the fuck is wrong with those people even considering these fucken arseholes Zigin should get anything but fucked in the arse, f@*€ me
Well said
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

j.l

Regular
Offer a new deal? :unsure:
Yeah I wonder... What's to stop Zijin coming back with a heaps better offer and tying up AVZ in a "first refusal"? Presumably they've got more coin than AVZ can summon.
Crossing fingers for a clean finish to this!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 6 users

tonster66

Regular
Like Cruiser said, Zijin have made their offer and AVZ have made theirs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users

CHB

Regular
I hope they don't let zijin in after what they've done. Would send a bad message to everyone.

They could give a way better offer than us but the fact that they tried to do the dodgy should be seen as negative.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Yeah I wonder... What's to stop Xijin coming back with a heaps better offer and tying up AVZ in a "first refusal"? Presumably they've got more coin than AVZ can summon.
Crossing fingers for a clean finish to this!
Zijin made an offer of US$33 million, illegally, AVZ made legally a fair and far superior offer.
What does the princess and Zijin try now??
An Auction, after a fraudulent manoeuvre costing everybody including the DRC and AVZ millions of dollars?

Why aren't these clowns locked up in jail?
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 25 users

Rediah

Regular
Thats how I want to see NF sending message to Zijin, rather give away free to others than see Zijin on the board table
💪💪💪💪


Money GIF
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

hedrox

Regular
Screen Shot 2022-08-21 at 8.17.34 pm.png
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Sad
Reactions: 17 users

Chase

Regular
Zijin made an offer of US$33 million, illegally, AVZ made legally a fair and far superior offer.
What does the princess and Zijin try now??
An Auction, after a fraudulent manoeuvre costing everybody including the DRC and AVZ millions of dollars?

Why aren't these clowns locked up in jail?
Just curious.
What was AVZ's offer?.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

The Fox

Regular
Like Cruiser said, Zijin have made their offer and AVZ have made theirs.
Good point, yet I suspect the two previous offers will not be compared or assumed as formal under the pre-emptive rights for the additional 15%.

Things can play out a few different ways if there is a significant offer from Zijin for the 15% in question. (That AVZ has pre-emptive rights on.)

AVZ can decide to match the offer by going to the market to raise the required funds or offering a more exotic deal to secure the 15% if the board believe the offer from Zijin is worth matching/beating. (I'd say Zijin only have a copy of the old (2021) DFS BTW)

If AVZ secures this 15% it will incerase its ownership of Dathcom from 51% to 66% (assuming starting point is 51% post completion of deal with CATH)

As already mentioned, if Zijin make a significant offer of X for the 15% (that appears to be above market odds at the time), then this will put a rocket up the SP IMO which will of course make it more cost affective to raise any funds in the near term needed to execute the pre-emptive rights option and secure the 15%.

It will all come down to whether Zijin actually makes an offer, (we shall see) all fine and well for Zijin to make these statements when the cameras are on them, yet this may change to an alternate strategy / focus in the DRC on other sites or maybe a full take over offer of Dathcom is tabled or something else that is yet to surface.

One thing for sure is AVZ is in control of the project and is the majority owner of Dathcom, irrelevant of whether they acquire the additional 15% or not.

In short, AVZ is in the box seat!!! I'm sure Nigel and co are now enjoying the face saving show put on by Zijin considering the issues they have caused AVZ to date.

Cheers The Fox 🦊
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 48 users

wombat74

Top 20
The DRC gov are giving Zijin an out . DRC can't afford to black list Zijin but at the same time have to be seen to hold up the law . IMO.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users

tonster66

Regular
Correct me if I am wrong (I know you will) but doesn't AVZ have the first right of refusal? This suggest that Cominiere puts a price on the 15% which AVZ can either take it or leave it.
I am sure that Nigel has stated in ANN's that they have been working with the government to gain the extra 15%. So, the cost for the 15% that Nigel has mentioned could be what has been agreed upon.
We shall see. IMO only.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 13 users
Top Bottom