LOCKY82
Regular
Done, cheers for that, hopefully get a response.Please email Jodie and I am sure she will book you in if NZ RS is still on.
here jlindsay@avzminerals.com.au
Done, cheers for that, hopefully get a response.Please email Jodie and I am sure she will book you in if NZ RS is still on.
here jlindsay@avzminerals.com.au
I've checked the Portal on those new tenements
Sorry my markup isn't great
You can see our current 13359 bordered red
The part that CAMI have carved off the original 13359 and we are waiting for a new 5 year permit de Reserches is the part I have highlighted yellow
Our current 4029 tenement (in blue with balck stripe) surrounds the norther section of the whole original 13359
The new tenements that have been discussed are 15285(CEMI with links to AJN) which borders our 4029 and 15282 (Palm Constellation SARL) which sits to the right of 15285
View attachment 20973
It doesn't appear any of them encroach our current tenements from what I can see
But the uncertainty over the status and makeup of the yellow section highlighted (which contains much of the northern section of CDL and was originally part of 13359) remains very problematic in my opinion
Guys......If I have got some of this interpreation wrong please feel free to add further guidance and thoughts
Cheers
Uncertain whether AVZ does have full legal right to CDL?@MoneyBags1348 Two issues - the comment "not fussed about northern section" indicates a lack of further interest. Second comment don't believe the bullshit unless its in the form of an announcement - well, AJN issued that announcement to the Canadian stock exchange
Oh, @Roon has just made the same observation
My understanding is if you do nothing on a PR tenement over the 5 years, you automatically lose 50% on renewal. This is what happened to 4029 and 4030. Fine, and legal. This is not the case on 13359 - AVZ have applied for the PE well within the timeframe and in so doing can expect to be granted the PE over the entire tenement.Uncertain whether AVZ does have full legal right to CDL?
Have they done suffient drilling to develop that part of the Manono Project to have it included in the surface rights.
One for Momentum and Nigel to explain what exactly in the DRC MINING CODE specifically mentions regarding appropriate spending $$ and specific time to frame to continue to hold rights.
Is there a legal loop hole that CAMI DG is using to support actions that lead to AJN applying.
Agree with Wombat get the ML for Roche Dure and part of CDL and progress to mining.
Hmm thats not good, but at least we know its still on and its full, and we have to check who is attending that session and if they can raise the concern for further clarification about this new development, otherwise we will be enquiring about it on Monday anyways.Full up!! If anyone from NZ cancels or can't make it please let me know and I'll try snag a seat.
View attachment 20981
Coffee, water and cookies. No drinks afterwards as far as I'm aware (or I missed them if there wereI might have missed it in the pages of posts since the Perth RS - but any reports on what the snacks were like, and was there decent beer being served?
Surprised its full. I hear they hired Eden Park which seats 60,000Hmm thats not good, but at least we know its still on and its full, and we have to check who is attending that session and if they can raise the concern for further clarification about this new development, otherwise we will be enquiring about it on Monday anyways.
I've checked the Portal on those new tenements
Sorry my markup isn't great
You can see our current 13359 bordered red
The part that CAMI have carved off the original 13359 and we are waiting for a new 5 year permit de Reserches is the part I have highlighted yellow
Our current 4029 tenement (in blue with balck stripe) surrounds the norther section of the whole original 13359
The new tenements that have been discussed are 15285(CEMI with links to AJN) which borders our 4029 and 15282 (Palm Constellation SARL) which sits to the right of 15285
View attachment 20973
It doesn't appear any of them encroach our current tenements from what I can see
But the uncertainty over the status and makeup of the yellow section highlighted (which contains much of the northern section of CDL and was originally part of 13359) remains very problematic in my opinion
Guys......If I have got some of this interpreation wrong please feel free to add further guidance and thoughts
Cheers
Shit don't like the sounds of that Sammael, so when you brought it up what happened?To my eyes it's important that AVZ maintains control of the northern section of the tenement. Otherwise market sentiment as to how the DRC have handled this situation will be tarnished further. Any outcome other than the above would be against DRC law as far as I'm aware. It's a massive value add to the assets we control one way or another.
Tried to broach this yesterday but inadvertently trod on a prickly pear. Anyway it bares further questioning at the roadshows imo.
Ive just emailed Jodie so will see if my 560000 shares has enough pulling powerPlease email Jodie and I am sure she will book you in if NZ RS is still on.
here jlindsay@avzminerals.com.au
No it's not what you're thinking! don't want to tread on another one!Shit don't like the sounds of that Sammael, so when you brought it up what happened?
I think your assessment is on the money. How could they possibly give the yellow section to some other entity as they would be required to cross our tenement regardless of the direction they enter from as we have it surrounded. Therefore I assume the announcement relates to the two top right tenements.I've checked the Portal on those new tenements
Sorry my markup isn't great
You can see our current 13359 bordered red
The part that CAMI have carved off the original 13359 and we are waiting for a new 5 year permit de Reserches is the part I have highlighted yellow
Our current 4029 tenement (in blue with balck stripe) surrounds the norther section of the whole original 13359
The new tenements that have been discussed are 15285(CEMI with links to AJN) which borders our 4029 and 15282 (Palm Constellation SARL) which sits to the right of 15285
View attachment 20973
It doesn't appear any of them encroach our current tenements from what I can see
But the uncertainty over the status and makeup of the yellow section highlighted (which contains much of the northern section of CDL and was originally part of 13359) remains very problematic in my opinion
Guys......If I have got some of this interpreation wrong please feel free to add further guidance and thoughts
Cheers
My take on the CDL matter was that Nigel's language on it has definitely changed. Unclear whether that's due to the mineralogy or as a gentle let down. He did mention "giving something back to the DRC", so I was left with the impression that the north section is a bargaining chip to be potentially ceded in negotiations.Thanks Nuts, I agree with your assessment, only thing I would add is read exactly what Nigel has said in the ASX Announcements…. Just don’t judge everything on the timing he gave for the ML because he already said Cong snd Mupande corrupted to hold that up.
I personally trust @JAG’s judgment and I also think we will keep the northern tenement (perhaps under a new code) that will give us the exploration rights.
Anyway the above is just what I consider based on Nigel’s comments.
Thanks for the clarification on this issue @grassseedsLike most shareholders, I was concerned that Dathcom could lose part of CDL.
My understanding (after the Roadshow and my interpretation of answers given ) of the status of CDL is that originally Mupande advised Dathcom that the President wanted the part CDL area now being discussed to be relinquished. Dathcom initially felt that if this was what the President wanted they may have to accept that this was part of the deal to get the ML. Subsequently Dathcom have had confirmed that the use of the President's name is a tactic used by many unscrupulous people to further their own agenda. The rumour is that the President has apparently repudiated this action on the CDL hive-off initiated by Mupande.
All comments given at the Roadshow were that Dathcom are fully committed to gaining all of CDL.
Mupande may be playing a game to further muddy the waters and create more problems for Dathcom. Even after the ML is granted I am sure further games will be played by large corporations who want part of the pie.
My suggestion is for everyone to sit back, do not jump at shadows, and wait for official comments to be posted by AVZ. Note the AGM is not too far away.
I still believe that after the ML is issued the size and quality of Manono will initiate a bidding war by large corporations to take over the project.
Excellent work grassseeds cheers,Like most shareholders, I was concerned that Dathcom could lose part of CDL.
My understanding (after the Roadshow and my interpretation of answers given ) of the status of CDL is that originally Mupande advised Dathcom that the President wanted the part CDL area now being discussed to be relinquished. Dathcom initially felt that if this was what the President wanted they may have to accept that this was part of the deal to get the ML. Subsequently Dathcom have had confirmed that the use of the President's name is a tactic used by many unscrupulous people to further their own agenda. The rumour is that the President has apparently repudiated this action on the CDL hive-off initiated by Mupande.
All comments given at the Roadshow were that Dathcom are fully committed to gaining all of CDL.
Mupande may be playing a game to further muddy the waters and create more problems for Dathcom. Even after the ML is granted I am sure further games will be played by large corporations who want part of the pie.
My suggestion is for everyone to sit back, do not jump at shadows, and wait for official comments to be posted by AVZ. Note the AGM is not too far away.
I still believe that after the ML is issued the size and quality of Manono will initiate a bidding war by large corporations to take over the project.