Even if that were true, which I doubt that it is, that could potentially make his information even more valuable. If you believe him to be a provocateur pushing an agenda on behalf of an AVZ adversary, and one that you've seen through, then you can use that insight to ferret out that adversaries game plan and as an indicator/warning of key timings or impending hostile actions. An insider that doesn't know he's been blown is worth their weight in gold to any analyst that can set aside cognitive biases.@Der Geist you ‘appear’ to post information but to anyone who looks closely at your content it’s not hard to see that your information is agenda driven and not as informative as you would like others to believe.
I thought you were the one who was going to provide Cong’s number to anyone here, now you suggest to @JAG that it was someone else.
Your constant referring to AVZ’s legal accountability and ASIC is misleading as anyone who has experience communicating with ASIC knows.
I personally feel that you are either in cahoots with R2D2 (and his alter ego) or you are all the same person.
You talk about Cong contacting ASIC…. If anything mate, my belief is that you have worked with Cong and that Cong orchestrated the the timing of the Dathomir claim with Mupande’s refusal to sign the ML and I suspect you had knowledge of both.
What I would really be interested in, is seeing you perform against a lie detector.
You may have @Roon and @Xerof and a few others thinking your information is worth considering, but to me, let’s just say…. You know what Cong is having for lunch
Look I don't know shit and this is just my thoughts on the matter.@Der Geist you ‘appear’ to post information but to anyone who looks closely at your content it’s not hard to see that your information is agenda driven and not as informative as you would like others to believe.
I thought you were the one who was going to provide Cong’s number to anyone here, now you suggest to @JAG that it was someone else.
Your constant referring to AVZ’s legal accountability and ASIC is misleading as anyone who has experience communicating with ASIC knows.
I personally feel that you are either in cahoots with R2D2 (and his alter ego) or you are all the same person.
You talk about Cong contacting ASIC…. If anything mate, my belief is that you have worked with Cong and that Cong orchestrated the the timing of the Dathomir claim with Mupande’s refusal to sign the ML and I suspect you had knowledge of both.
What I would really be interested in, is seeing you perform against a lie detector.
You may have @Roon and @Xerof and a few others thinking your information is worth considering, but to me, let’s just say…. You know what Cong is having for lunch
The fact that at this very moment modo just ‘liked’ one of my posts only confirms that you are all four of the above mentioned and you are working together.
No sense me getting bothered by it, more important is what you and Cong are up to.
Just a thought...@Der Geist you ‘appear’ to post information but to anyone who looks closely at your content it’s not hard to see that your information is agenda driven and not as informative as you would like others to believe.
I thought you were the one who was going to provide Cong’s number to anyone here, now you suggest to @JAG that it was someone else.
Your constant referring to AVZ’s legal accountability and ASIC is misleading as anyone who has experience communicating with ASIC knows.
I personally feel that you are either in cahoots with R2D2 (and his alter ego) or you are all the same person.
You talk about Cong contacting ASIC…. If anything mate, my belief is that you have worked with Cong and that Cong orchestrated the the timing of the Dathomir claim with Mupande’s refusal to sign the ML and I suspect you had knowledge of both.
What I would really be interested in, is seeing you perform against a lie detector.
You may have @Roon and @Xerof and a few others thinking your information is worth considering, but to me, let’s just say…. You know what Cong is having for lunch
The fact that at this very moment modo just ‘liked’ one of my posts only confirms that you are all four of the above mentioned and you are working together.
No sense me getting bothered by it, more important is what you and Cong are up to.
I dont put anyone on ignore as i like to challenge my investment and clear my head of any confirmation bias.Even if that were true, which I doubt that it is, that could potentially make his information even more valuable. If you believe him to be a provocateur pushing an agenda on behalf of an AVZ adversary, and one that you've seen through, then you can use that insight to ferret out that adversaries game plan and as an indicator/warning of key timings or impending hostile actions. An insider that doesn't know he's been blown is worth their weight in gold to any analyst that can set aside cognitive biases.
Again, I don't believe this is the case in this instance, but in general just because someone's pushing an agenda doesn't mean you should automatically ignore any information they present - just factor that into your assessments
Digging deeper, I see that Nigel has answered all our questions here:100% Agreed. All I meant is that I should've dig deeper at the time that these issues were first flagged. But definitely was on BOD to update the market
Oh gee, look at all that suggestion of foul play you've brought up, now us investors will have more doubt and fear. Oh no now our confidence is lower and lower. Oh no!Digging deeper, I see that Nigel has answered all our questions here:
My question @JAG if you would is:
How has Tshisekedi been cleaning up the “place up”?
Why could Tshisedeki not stop the Portfolio Ministry and Cominiere from transacting, because there was a State asset sale freeze?
Why has AVZ not recognized the alleged state asset freeze?
Why did the Congolese state make a joint venture easily with AJN but not AVZ?
Is Klaus Eckhof an opponent of AVZ in Manono?
If not, why is he assisting Simon Cong with AJN and TTX?
Is CATL involved still with Cong and Tantalex? I refer to the equity injection in 2018 by CATL chairman Zheng Yuqun.
Did Klaus Eckhof engage in insider trading between June 04 to June 07 2018?
Do you still enjoy a close association with Mr Eckhof?
I have more but this will do for now
View attachment 20609
I agree Dergeist is abstruse, but have you asked for clarification? He seems to be very approachable.Look I don't know shit and this is just my thoughts on the matter.
But something doesn't smell right with geist, yes I was hearing his warnings but gee, how come he semeed to be the only one who knew what was going on? And his attitude at the time was heavily down ramping style of the trolls, at least it appeared that way to me.
Yes agenda driven, manipulative, appears to me to be deliberately confusing, the coded language to me screams smokescreen, the opposite of transparent and clear. At first I thought it might be an ASD kind of thing (not derogatory, I've supported many in my work and recognise certain traits), but now you've pointed it out I see it a bit clearer myself, and it looks like deliberate convolusions to me.
It's not hard to speak clearly and make it obvious what your intentions are.
I think it's also not hard to deliberately muddy your language for the purpose of deception and confusion too.
NOTHING he/she says is ever clear.
Just my thoughts to get others thinking about it too.
P.S. Also, anyone elses ears pricked up about the frequent paranoia about doxxing? Warning people against it? Just sounds like identity paranoia to me. No one else carries on about it like they do.
If not now when?Oh gee, look at all that suggestion of foul play you've brought up, now us investors will have more doubt and fear. Oh no now our confidence is lower and lower. Oh no!
![]()
Oh so he's your bestie and a great guy overall? An endorsement from you is it?I agree Dergeist is abstruse, but have you asked for clarification? He seems to be very approachable.
On the other hand, I agree he has an agenda. That agenda is is exactly what is fomenting now: disclosure of what’s material. AVZ has a history of getting into trouble with the ASX. The ASX appears hostile and AVZ have every right to be afraid of the ASX including any vested nefarious interests at work within ASX discretionary targets.
In reference to doxxing, as I’ve stated on my own behalf, doxxing is pointless and endangers the very thing that you’re trying to protect: the company. If DerGeist is a sleuth what else does he know? Think about it.
He has been around long enough to know everyone’s identity and I haven’t seen him once dox a member anywhere. Looks to be a thorough-going decent chap to me.
@Der GeistHi
Would you please let us know more about you, and your affiliation with AVZ. Don’t take this the wrong way but tell us who you are and in what capacity you are linked with any of this.
Someone somewhere said that AVZ has done you wrong in the past, is that true? If you are not a holder, you have spent a lot of time “uncovering” lots of things. Why spend so much of your time for something you don’t hold and doesn’t affect you, what’s in it for you ?![]()
Agree also no matter how you wrap it an announcement on the same day as the gob fest imo doesn't show any respect to share holders. Which is sort of part and parcel for this bod. Unfortunately.Just like you, i dont have a problem with @Der Geist and i agree , the cryptic writing style can be a tough read from time to time, but if you are making your decisions based on a random poster , then thats a bit dangerous.
The fact of the matter, if the BOD were more upfront with the ASX / shareholders with some of the challenges it was facing, then everyone could of had the chance to have another look at the weight of their holdings accordingly and possibly wouldnt be in the conundrum that we are in now.
Just sayin.
I agree Dergeist is abstruse, but have you asked for clarification? He seems to be very approachable.
On the other hand, I agree he has an agenda. That agenda is is exactly what is fomenting now: disclosure of what’s material. AVZ has a history of getting into trouble with the ASX. The ASX appears hostile and AVZ have every right to be afraid of the ASX including any vested nefarious interests at work within ASX discretionary targets.
In reference to doxxing, as I’ve stated on my own behalf, doxxing is pointless and endangers the very thing that you’re trying to protect: the company. If DerGeist is a sleuth what else does he know? Think about it.
He has been around long enough to know everyone’s identity and I haven’t seen him once dox a member anywhere. Looks to be a thorough-going decent chap to me.
I suspect you’re here to do what you’re accusing me of but unwittingly.think you have one objective here and that is to destabalise shareholder confidence.
Very strange, AVZ intends to improve value for them