Winenut
Go AVZ!
Totally agree 100%Top effort AA, this is by far the most clear, sensible interpretation I have read on this matter on any platform, this one included. It explains why NF thinks the ML is immine I mean close
Totally agree 100%Top effort AA, this is by far the most clear, sensible interpretation I have read on this matter on any platform, this one included. It explains why NF thinks the ML is immine I mean close
View attachment 19536
Bloody hope he’s right
Nice one Jag
A whole lot more old recycled news ffs.
Going around in circles for 6 months.
Nice one Jag
There's a few other shysters around that could use a good probing....
Just replying to your post so I can read it again in the light of day
I think that one is lost in translation Frank
Thanks Nut, they are saying the Felix was copied into the file not implicated in the file?I think that one is lost in translation Frank
I suspect "Plusieurs organisations avaient saisi Felix Tshisekedi sur le meme dossier" actually means that the IGF not not only transmitted the document to the Attorney General at the Court of Appeal in Gombe but other organisations also sent the very same file/document to Felix Tshisekedi himself
My French is a little rusty but to me it reads like: Le tout est un étron massifI think that one is lost in translation Frank
I suspect "Plusieurs organisations avaient saisi Felix Tshisekedi sur le meme dossier" actually means that the IGF not not only transmitted the document to the Attorney General at the Court of Appeal in Gombe but other organisations also sent the very same file/document to Felix Tshisekedi himself
If you remember the ML was /is being issued before the consideration of the extra 15% . To quote NF," the minimum we will go down to on the back of the Cath deal is 51% ." NF 6/05/22 . NF himself has known the extra 15% is not a given . The issuing of the ML brings Cath into play $$$$$.AVZ announcement dated 20 Oct 2022:
Jin Cheng ICC Arbitration Proceedings
The Arbitrator has issued Procedural Order No.1-3 ruling in favour of AVZI and consequently will now proceed to hear and determine AVZI’s jurisdictional challenge (around whether AVZI’s pre-emption rights were breached) before dealing, if necessary, with the merits of the case.
The timetable of the arbitral proceedings are yet to be set by the arbitrator.
Unfortunately, after three months, the ICC bus remains stuck in Woollies car park. Even if it has jurisdiction to hear the case there is no timetable for hearings, and a final decision could be years away.
Given that pretty much all future progress is dependent on the outcome of this challenge and any subsequent rulings., management's proposed roadshows may not deliver its desired outcomes. After all, there is little to gain by going on the road without positive news or a solid timetable to mining.
Just thinking out aloud.
Cheers
Whinebut, you don’t get to choose hereYeah...nah...
Wasn't talking to you
Take your own sanctimonious advice
Obviously you’re in a hard spot Wine, no one wants to cosy up with you to form a private group, hence this forum becomes a defacto whatsapp group for you.Yeah...nah...
Wasn't talking to you
Take your own sanctimonious advice
That is my reading of it....but I'm no expert in FrenchThanks Nut, they are saying the Felix was copied into the file not implicated in the file?