DiscoDanNZ
Regular
We also stand to lose from a takeover in the long term.
Not sure why we're entertaining the thoughts of a takeover. You got to ask yourself, have the fundamentals changed in the COmpany so significantly that you are uncomfortable to continue holding? IF so - you may wish to revisit your holdings.
Myself: nothing has changed significantly, imo.
Exactly, my guess for the recurring takeover chat is boredom sparked by the occasional cat amongst the pidgeons post.
Here's my personal position on this stock:
I don't hold a huge amount compared to a lot of people here however AVZ is around 70% of my total exposure to the stock market. Because I believe in it and I wouldn't have put that much in if I didn't think it was worth it. Nothing has changed for me in the fundamentals to make me question my investment other than the current issues which I believe Nigel when he uses words like nefarious and meritless to describe. Basically the DRC needs to stop shitting in their own backyard and sort this out.
Financially for me a takeover means a sizeable chunk of my mortgage is gone. Mid-term (call it a 5 -10 year time frame) and no takeover of AVZ for me means I'm mortgage free and reaping healthy dividends (hopefully). Long-long term (say LOM) I'm retiring early even with my relatively small outlay. I could have invested a lot more as the price rose but part of me really liked seeing the profit % on my 12c average.
I think a lot of holders see themselves in a similar position as me but I'm not going to speak for everyone.