CeckRaiseFold
Regular
I'm pretty sure TO talk stems almost solely from the apparent ineptitude of the DRC and the lack of trust associated with it. These bastards need to pull their finger out and make a concrete stance on advancing the project. AVZ is ready and loosing valuable time. The endless unnecessary delays are exasperating and it is costing all involved one way or another. We need certainty moving forward. 12 months delay is already significant and who knows what's being held back out of necessity behind the scenes.
It really beggars belief why we should be in this position at this stage.
There have been a few noises made about after the 77th General Assembly of the United Nations.
Let's hope they amount to something.
Everybody's investment situation in AVZ is different.
For some, including me, a TO for $1.50 - $2.00 makes perfect investment sense. If you have bought in for single digit cents you can make up to 40 or 50 times your original investment. It makes perfect rational sense for people to then want to cash in, no need to call it bull shit it is simply sound investing and taking profits. Making such a return is very rare and for some already life changing. You can then kick back and enjoy the cash or re-invest somewhere else in penny stocks trying to repeat it. From a level of $1.5 - $2 you will not see another 10 fold increase in AVZ soon if at all.
Grasseeds points out some other reasons why a TO now might not be a bad thing for many LTH who bought in low and why the offer will never be at the value some expect the company to be once mining.I sense that we have a discussion going on where we have comments on what is a possible result and what is a probable result. Yes, it is possible that all our dreams will come true and AVZ will obtain 90% of the project and onsell 24% to Cath and then go mining. One of the other probable alternatives is that AVZ will be forced to compromise on its options and accept a less favourable outcome.
AVZ is a small company, with limited capacity, limited experience, and no track record of operating a mine in DRC. On the other hand, there are numerous Chinese companies already operating in the DRC. The Chinese have invested billions, have networks of influence, and are prepared to pay to get what they want. We should all be able to see that trying to get what we believe are contractual rights processed, is difficult to achieve in the DRC environment.
I am assuming that AVZ is having difficulty in getting approval for the total area they appear to be entitled to. I suspect that this is the reason for the suspension. AVZ by being in suspension has benefits which include limits to short selling and helps to puts pressure back on the DRC officials to fix the problems. AVZ need to remain in suspension until they get at least the ML.
AVZ is now fighting on many fronts to stop the possible claim jumpers. I assume that Tantalex is pushing for access to not only surface rights to the dumps of material, but also arguing for total access to this area as well. One of their arguments will be that AVZ has more area than they can use now, and Tantalex can quickly get another mine in operation which will be a major benefit to DRC.
Klaus Ekhoff has many contacts ( including probably the ones he used to get AVZ's initial area ) and he will also be pushing for access to good Lithium areas.
Zijin will be making offers to support Tantalex or Klaus etc. Saving face is important to the Chinese and with their access to large amounts of capital, it is highly probable that they will be making takeover offers.
We also now have at least the Americans trying to get in the game. It would make sense if they could take a part of AVZ ( who will need the capital and also to dilute the large Chinese shareholding already in AVZ)
AVZ has outstanding problems such as the Dathomir issue, the Zijin arbitration, and CAMI playing hardball in finalising the ML. All of these problems could take some further months to complete.
AVZ has been waiting for about 12 months to try and get the ML. This by itself indicates that AVZ does not have the clout in the DRC to get these problems quickly sorted. Will CATH's involvement, or perhaps some European or American support help to eliminate the logjam?
I see the possibility that CATH may step in to assist AVZ in sorting out Dathomir to get their 24% finalised and AVZ holding 51%.
Only the DRC can sort out the ML and AVZ's land area. The comments about the Europeans and Americans with regard to cleaning up corruption before they invest should be positive for AVZ's claims.
With AVZ the David in the fight against Goliath, I suspect that we will have many more twists and turns before the dust settles.
My impression is that the project possibilities are so big that AVZ will be under constant pressure to sell its share in the project. With a large Chinese shareholding in AVZ, any official takeover offer by a Chinese company will be well supported.
Like all long-term shareholders, I would prefer AVZ to stay with the project and maximize shareholders returns. However, with a red hot lithium market, I expect some compromises which will reduce potential returns.
Best of luck to all.
Nobody would price a current TO for what an operating, possibly expanded, mine will be worth. There would be no incentive or upside value left for the entity doing the take over. Whilst they would be taking on the largest hard rock deposit in the world, they also take on large amounts of risks and uncertainties on the way to mining.
The reduced TO valuation allows for all the risk along the way to a completed and well operating mine. And those risks are large. Assume even for a minute corruption is rooted out at high level government and regulators which takes up the majority on this forum discussion. It is to be expected to be rife at all lower levels that a construction project would have to deal with, importing materials and equipment, access to sites, site security, wage demands, obtaining work permits, ensuring local jobs and forced use of local agents and contractors, etc, etc. I know, I have lived it myself in a neighbouring country. These constant challenges would be a drain on manpower and funds and will likely cause significant delays to the mine, the hydro electric plant the power transmission, the trucking operation, the rail operation, etc. To persevere it requires deep pockets, experience in building mines and major logistics and having productive networks in-country.
People who keep saying we're going mining soon, have not worked in West Africa and completely underestimate the massive undertaking this project is. For a company like AVZ it has the big risk of along the way needing to take on more debt, issue further capital raises or dilute project ownership, and possibly fend-off further coordinated scaremongering to supress the SP, all eroding the currently perceived future value or SP.
Do not overestimate AVZ's negotiation position, particularly after those very sobering and humbling last number of months. If realistic offers are rebuffed, TO candidates might very well say: "OK AVZ, good luck, we'll talk again once you run out of money or you're tied in red-tape and bribery knots".
So, yes, I would gladly take a $2 TO offer right now, write my resignation letter, reinvest some and thoroughly enjoy the rest! We all have our individual history and forward strategy/hopes with AVZ, this is mine.