My thinking as well . This dude got the word AVZ is about to awaken from it's slumber imo.Thanks Jag, I just finished preparing a similar post - beat me to it lol. Do you think Neeto could be a professional analyst for one of the other big US fund managers?
Is that $50 mil on top of what we already gave them ?Claim-2 (Dathomir)partially (10%) dismissed in AVZ favor by the Lubanbashi court of appeals,remaining 5% still in dispute and can besettled for good if AVZ gives $50 million more to Dathomir.
So refer to above, for the dathomir case -
So the 5% is last issue for the ownership dispute, anyone here can provide some more information?
- 10% now is in our favor
- 5% still in disput
All these statements at the end are in regards to upcoming developements/announcements and their relative effect on the share price.Claim-2 (Dathomir)partially (10%) dismissed in AVZ favor by the Lubanbashi court of appeals,remaining 5% still in dispute and can besettled for good if AVZ gives $50 million more to Dathomir.
So refer to above, for the dathomir case -
So the 5% is last issue for the ownership dispute, anyone here can provide some more information?
- 10% now is in our favor
- 5% still in disput
Happy to personally profit should it ever get there, but a random new guy posting what essentially was data from "that spreadsheet" last year isn't something I'm going to believe.
EasyClaim-2 (Dathomir)partially (10%) dismissed in AVZ favor by the Lubanbashi court of appeals,remaining 5% still in dispute and can besettled for good if AVZ gives $50 million more to Dathomir.
So refer to above, for the dathomir case -
So the 5% is last issue for the ownership dispute, anyone here can provide some more information?
- 10% now is in our favor
- 5% still in disput
Surely 330 cents US!$330 USD at the start of 2023?
Uhhh....
![]()
I haven't been able to find anything concrete that suggests that any part of Dathcom's 13359 holding was or is under threat from another entity. I think the rumour begun because of AJN's announcement on the 19th of April 2022 (link below) that they were going to receive a number of licenses in the Manono area that had been returned to the public domain.The issue with 13359's size has been something I've never quite grasped. Does anyone here understand it and could elaborate?
I've read people stating that it's Klaus or AJN responsible for taking the top half away, trying to steal it, if so how could that be possible?
You can't just take it away with brown paper bags, there has to be some kind of argument or reason if they were trying to do so.
As stated in the mining decree announcement by AVZ, they are splitting the tenement in two, the bottom half to be granted a mining licence and the top to become a new separate zone to be granted an exploration permit. I mean.... right? Isn't that what they said? Isn't this exactly what they planned?
In my mind, it didn't dissapear, they just reformed the 13359 area as that is the area AVZ want to mine initially. And a new zone will form the currently blank area, and be granted an exploration permit, until such time AVZ want to mine that too in future years.
They said they were doing this, it was intended.
So what information is out there indicating it's trying to be taken away from AVZ?
Hope someone can clear this up.
Do you think Neeto could be a professional analyst for one of the other big US fund managers?