Yes AVZ stated that as quoted, but you can add the rest, the mention of an appeal.
That statement has inconsistencies, for example, how to differentiate “order” from “decision”
That AVZ is not a “party”, is ill-defined, since there is an appeal that is material for AVZ
“subject to an appeal which has the effect, under DRC law, of suspending the Tribunal Decision; and”
Also has anyone heard of any progress on this “case”:
“…the subject of a request on 1 February 2022 by the DRC Minister of Justice, that the DRC General Inspectorate of Judicial and Penitentiary Services, examine the case and that, pending the examination, nothing be done on the case…”
In some instances lawyers like to settle to move on. Mr Cong is no push over but a well embedded tick on it’s host