The Fox
Regular
Will it be better off for avz to sell x percent of AVZI to CATH for the 240m, instead of 24% of Dathcom? This will guarantee AVZI has the control on DATHCOM while CATH can still enjoy their investment equivalent to about 24% DATHCOM.
FIRB does not allow selling Avz to certain countries not sure AVZI
Agreement already struck with CATH as we know. Considering the size of the financial commitment now and towards production costs, a direct holding in the entity that holds the ML is appropriate and fair.
That part of the deal with CATH would not change. More chance of CATH being replaced then ownership structure changes. (Small chance IMO they could be swapped out for a US giant or EU industry player, I wouldn’t mind at all).
Cheers The Fox