So the government know they are dodgy pricks . Unfortunately these meat heads cannot resist the offer of snacks .
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Bin59
Regular
Brokers Get Unfair Profits From Lending Stock, Pension Funds Say
Bill AlpertJuly 7, 2022 2:00 am ET
A federal magistrate recently recommended class-action status for an antitrust suit concerning share loans.
SPENCER PLATT/GETTY IMAGES
Five of Wall Street’s biggest brokers are a step closer to defending class-action claims that they conspired to wring unfair profits from the nearly $2 trillion dollar market for stock loans.
A successful class-action case could crimp profits at the prime brokerage units of defendants Goldman Sachs (ticker: GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), UBS (UBS), the J.P. Morgan unit of JPMorgan Chase (JPM), and the Merrill Lynch unit of Bank of America (BAC).
On June 30, Manhattan federal magistrate judge Sarah Cave recommended class-action status for an antitrust case in which a trio of pension funds allege the big brokers run a cartel that extracts unfair profits from stock lending. Stock loans are a key part of the short sales and options trades carried out by hedge funds, as well as a profit source for pension and mutual funds.
When a hedge fund wants to short the shares of a particular company, it first borrows those shares from long-term investors such as investment firms, pension and endowment funds and insurance companies. The prime brokers sit between borrower and lender and have exclusive knowledge of both share inventories and trading strategies. The suit alleges that they abuse this position.
For investment giants like BlackRock or Fidelity that manage America’s pensions and savings, lending shares has become an important source of revenue and one of the reasons they have been able to reduce fees on mutual funds. If the suit is successful, these firms could get even more revenue from share lending.
Stocklending is one of the last, large over-the-counter financial markets in theU.S., and its opacity has been called “a market failure” by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “This asymmetric information between those in the centre of the lending market and those on the periphery may lead to inferiorterms for those on the periphery,” said the SEC in December, when it proposed new reporting requirements on stock loans.
The prime broker defendants abused their central positions to skim profit from bothlenders and borrowers, says the antitrust complaint filed by three pensionfunds in Manhattan’s federal district court in 2017. The defendant brokersconspired to freeze out challengers that had tried to introduce transparentpricing and central clearing to the stock loan business, says the complaint,which cites conversations in which brokerage executives compared themselves tothe five crime families of the New York mafia. When one of the stock-loanstart-ups pitched his product in 2008, the complaint quotes a securitiesclearing executive as responding: “This sounds great, but who’s going to startyour car in the morning?”
If U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla follows last week’s recommendationfor class-action certification, the three funds that brought the suit—the IowaPublic Employees’ Retirement System, the Orange County Employees’ RetirementSystem and the Sonoma County Employees’ Retirement System—could seek damages onbehalf of hundreds of others.
Representingthem are legal teams led by Daniel Brockett, of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &Sullivan, and Michael Eisenkraft, of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll. Thelawyers have gotten billions from the big banks in settlements of otherclass-action suits over the banks’ behavior in the markets for credit default swaps, bond markets and mortgage-backed securities.
“We’re pleased with Judge Cave’s ruling on class certification,” said Brockett, “and look forward to continued litigation against the banks to maximize recoveries for the benefit of class members.”
When asked about the allegations in the antitrust suit, Goldman Sachs and UBS declined to comment. Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan and Merrill Lynch didn’t respond.
Credit Suisse Group
(CS) was also named in the original complaint, but after exiting the prime brokerage business in the wake of the Archegos CapitalManagement debacle, Credit Suisse settled the stock loan suit for $81 million, without admitting to the allegations.
The brokers deny that their stock loans violate antitrust law, and unsuccessfully sought to have the case dismissed. In a day-long hearing before Judge Cave inApril, lawyers for the prime brokers asserted that stock-lending over -the-counter structure helped pension funds find borrowers forless-sought-after stocks, and helped hedge funds get hard-to-borrow stocks. A more transparent stock loan market would threaten the confidentiality of short sellers positions, said the brokers.
In April’s hearing, the pension fund plaintiffs pointed to several overseas markets that introduced central clearing and public pricing to securities lending. In the U.S., public platforms for trading securities like U.S.Treasuries have trimmed clients’ transaction costs. Economists working with the plaintiffs told Judge Cave that the prime brokers’ grip on stock lending had damaged pension funds by at least $5 billion, and hedge funds by over $2billion.
Althoughthe antitrust plaintiffs seek damages on behalf of the hedge fund industry, notevery fund wanted part in the case. Pretrial discovery was stalled for monthsin 2020, when lawyers representing 22 hedge funds told the court they fearedtheir proprietary trading strategies would be exposed in the stock loan recordsthe plaintiffs were getting from the prime brokers. Anonymizing procedures wereestablished, but even then, seven large quant funds opted out of thecase—including Citadel LLC, Two Sigma Investments, Renaissance Technologies,and D.E. Shaw.
Writeto Bill Alpert at william.alpert@barrons.com
Frank
Top 20
*Fyi, fwiw, I see where,
Heads of FBI and MI5 raise fresh alarms about Chinese economic espionage
‘It’s the Chinese government that poses the biggest long-term threat to our economic and national security,’ Wray says in London speech
The head of the FBI and the leader of Britain’s domestic intelligence agency raised fresh alarms Wednesday about the Chinese government, warning business leaders that Beijing is determined to steal their technology for competitive gain.FBI Director Christopher Wray reaffirmed longstanding concerns in denouncing economic espionage and hacking operations by China as well as the Chinese government’s efforts to stifle dissent abroad, but his speech was notable because it took place at MI5’s London headquarters and alongside the agency’s director general, Ken McCallum, in an intended show of Western solidarity.
The remarks also showed the extent to which Wray and the FBI regard the Chinese government as not only a law enforcement and intelligence challenge, but are also attuned to the implications of Beijing’s foreign policy actions.
“We consistently see that it’s the Chinese government that poses the biggest long-term threat to our economic and national security, and by ‘our,’ I mean both of our nations, along with our allies in Europe and elsewhere,” Wray said.
McCallum said the Chinese government and its “covert pressure across the globe” amounts to “the most game-changing challenge we face.”
“This might feel abstract, but it’s real and it’s pressing,” he said. “We need to talk about it. We need to act.”
A spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington, Liu Pengyu, rejected the allegations from the Western leaders, saying in an emailed statement to The Associated Press that China “firmly opposes and combats all forms of cyber attacks” and calling the accusations groundless.
“We will never encourage, support or condone cyber attacks,” the statement said.
In a nod to current tensions between China and Taiwan, Wray also said during his speech that any forcible takeover of Taipei by Beijing would “would represent one of the most horrific business disruptions the world has ever seen.”
Last week, the U.S. government’s director of national intelligence, Avril Haines, said at an event in Washington that there were no indications Chinese President Xi Jinping was poised to take Taiwan by military force, but she did say Xi appeared to be “pursuing the potential” for such an action as part of a broader Chinese government goal of reunification of Taiwan.
After the appearance with his British counterpart, Wray said that he would leave to others the question of whether an invasion of Taiwan was more or less likely after Russia’s invasion of neighboring Ukraine.
But, he said, “I don’t have any reason to think their interest in Taiwan has abated in any fashion” and added that he hoped China had learned what happens “when you overplay your hand,” as he said the Russians have done in Ukraine.
The FBI director said there are signs the Chinese, perhaps drawing lessons from Russia’s experience since the war, have looked for ways to “insulate their economy” against potential sanctions.
“In our world, we call that behavior a clue,” said Wray, who throughout his speech urged caution from Western companies looking to do business in or with China.
He said Western investments in China could collapse in the event of an invasion of Taiwan.
“Just as in Russia, Western investments built over years could become hostages, capital stranded (and) supply chains and relationships disrupted,” he said.
President Joe Biden said in May that the U.S. would respond militarily if China invaded Taiwan, offering one of the most forceful White House statements in support of Taiwan’s self-governing in decades.
The White House later tried to soften the impact of the statement, saying Biden was not outlining a change in U.S. policy toward Taiwan, a self-governing island that China views as a breakaway province that should be reunified with the mainland.
The embassy spokesman said the Taiwan issue was “purely China’s internal affair” and said when it comes to questions of China’s territory and sovereignty, the country has “no room for compromise or concession.”
“We will strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification with utmost sincerity and efforts,” the statement said, though it noted that China will “reserve the option of taking all necessary measures in response to the interference of foreign forces.”
www.marketwatch.com
Food for thought on the Road to Mining Manono
Frank
Thunderpony
27 µg per 100 mL
Try weed.
JAG
Top 20
MoneyBags1348
Top 20
I know this is off topic but goldman sucks just released another report saying oil will hit $140 a barrel and the Eurozone and UK will follow the US into recession. My opinion only but these arsewipes seem to be in bed with republican members of the US Supreme Court who are now making decisions to stop the US attempts to curb global warming as well as decisions on abortion. I don’t know who else believes in visualisation (like I do) but if everyone here could imagine a crater 100 miles deep opening up on the Earth’s surface and swallowing these cocks, the world just might be a better place
Last edited:
Samus
Top 20
You talking about this Wombat?
"It has been learned that the transfer of a 15% interest in Dathcom between Dathomir and AVZ was terminated by a court of law upon Dathomir’s application, due to significant defects in the original transaction process. Dathomir still holds good legal title to a 15% interest in Dathcom."
World-class Manono Lithium Mine in the DRC to be developed soon, Zijin Mining holds a 15% interest in the project-News-Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
Zijin News – Her Excellency Antoinette N'Samba Kal
www.zijinmining.com
Samus
Top 20
Begs a lot of questions and the subsequent answers that part.
Bull Market
Member
Friday special today jag?
Spikerama
Regular
Well shuck me.
Dont you mean: "Im going for the oyster" ????
Similar threads
