Shame Shaneis that you Shane ?
Shame Shaneis that you Shane ?
Don't forget about how the media is manipulated from all angles:-Another one
![]()
US Backs AVZ in Congo Lithium Dispute Against China
AVZ wins a legal battle over Congo’s Manono lithium mine as the US moves to counter China’s influence in critical minerals.colitco.com
Don't forget about how the media is manipulated from all angles:-
Not complaining, just reality.
TC.
Devils advocate but they were pretty specific in saying no WRITTEN offer has been received - but amovotio could still be correct in a handshake or verbal negotiation could be underway/done.I would love to know The Australian’s source for their story. Is there any obligation for them to disclose if asked?
Speaking of information, I’d like to reach out to Amovotio directly but Hotcrapper doesn’t support this. I’m interested in knowing his or her updated view given AVZ‘s last statement that no written deal had been received came after their ‘deal is done’ post.
China will pay no attention to it's findings and carry on business as usual ?Agree . Cominere is a bit player taking instructions from Zijin and is completely immune .The ICC is a toothless tiger . China will pay no attention to it's findings and carry on business as usual . Fines and penalties are just numbers that will never see the light of day . AVZ last and only chance rests with the United States for the southern region . It's 50/50 at best and that's being generous . The current hype in the media could be seen as misleading .
Meeting on the 18th March.
With USA aligned to provide security to DRC .
the meeting will take on a different perspective by Rwanda and M23.?
Embattled Congo president considers sitting down with M23 rebels
By Ange Adihe Kasongo and Sonia Rolley
March 15, 202512:42 AM GMT+11Updated a day
KINSHASA, March 14 (Reuters) - Democratic Republic of Congo President Felix Tshisekedi has long ruled out dialogue with the Rwanda-backed M23 rebels rampaging through eastern parts of his country, but a string of defeats and waning regional support have forced him think again.
Neighbouring Angola caught many by surprise this week by saying Congo and M23 would sit down for direct talks in its capital on March 18, at a time when the rebels are still seizing territory rich with coltan, tantalum and other minerals.
The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Tshisekedi's government has so far not committed publicly, but three government sources told Reuters this week he was seriously considering sending a delegation.
With Congo's army and allied forces putting up weak resistance to the rebel advance, regional powers appear in agreement that dialogue is the only way forward, diplomats and analysts said.
"I haven't talked to a single African country that says Kinshasa shouldn't talk to M23," one senior diplomat said.
"The line of everyone is, 'How do you stop the fighting if you don't engage with them?'"
One source said on Friday that government participation was a sure thing but that it was still too early to say who would represent Kinshasa in Luanda.
Other sources said the debate was still ongoing and that a final decision was not likely to be made until next week.
M23, for its part, said on Thursday it was demanding an unequivocal commitment from Tshisekedi to engage in talks.
Both sides said they had questions about the framework and how the Angola-hosted talks would comply with decisions from regional bodies attempting to resolve the conflict.
Southern and East African foreign and defence ministers are due to meet in Harare on Monday to discuss the push for a cessation of hostilities and political dialogue.
'FAILED' MILITARY APPROACH
M23 is backed by thousands of Rwandan troops, according to U.N. experts, and their superior weaponry and equipment has allowed them to seize east Congo's two biggest cities since late January along with a host of smaller localities.
Rwanda denies providing arms and troops to M23, and says its forces are acting in self defence against the Congolese army and militias hostile to Kigali.
Sitting down with M23 would likely be deeply unpopular in Kinshasa, especially after Tshisekedi's repeated vows never to do so.
But it would amount to an acknowledgment that Tshisekedi's pursuit of a military solution has "failed", said Congolese analyst Bob Kabamba of the University of Liege in Belgium.
"Kinshasa's position of dialogue is understandable because it finds itself stuck, thinking that the (rebel alliance) must not reach a critical threshold," he said.
This Article below highlights the level of corruption in the defence force
Generals loot the money while soldiers risking their lives barely get $50 per month .
Sounds familiar with the governing ministers while the vast majority of the population live in poverty,
DRC need USA intervention and IMO will give Trump what he wants.
Nigel and Team amazing efforts thank you
https://www.dw.com/en/why-dr-congos-army-struggles-against-the-smaller-m23/a-71898011
On or around 10th April …??Devils advocate but they were pretty specific in saying no WRITTEN offer has been received - but amovotio could still be correct in a handshake or verbal negotiation could be underway/done.
Of course I wouldn’t just take a post on a forum as fact until AVZ comes out with a proper announcement
I read this to suggest that AVZ was looking to gain a long-term deal regarding our share of the remaining offtake (based on the non-CATH ownership percentage remaining), likely with a desired significant upfront lump sum that (in addition with the money from the CATH sale) would be used to fund our share of the Project infrastructure development costs.View attachment 79419
Couple of matters:
If anyone has a copy of the Dathomir rejoinder Partial Award, could they either post it publicly, or DM me a copy please. I don't know why Management haven't posted it on the website (I know they lost their challenge but......we aren't afraid to be told about minor negative outcomes, in the interests of full disclosure)
Interesting wording used regarding their USA visit "a view to raising funds to support its endeavours to secure and develop the Manono Lithium Project including via a long term commitment in respect to its share of the mineral off take", followed by the wider statement regarding various parties expressing interest in the Project
So, was the first objective to find a CATH replacement?
View attachment 79419
Couple of matters:
If anyone has a copy of the Dathomir rejoinder Partial Award, could they either post it publicly, or DM me a copy please. I don't know why Management haven't posted it on the website (I know they lost their challenge but......we aren't afraid to be told about minor negative outcomes, in the interests of full disclosure)
Interesting wording used regarding their USA visit "a view to raising funds to support its endeavours to secure and develop the Manono Lithium Project including via a long term commitment in respect to its share of the mineral off take", followed by the wider statement regarding various parties expressing interest in the Project
So, was the first objective to find a CATH replacement?
Dathomir have lost every question before the ICC so far
And will continue to lose
The tell, apart from all of the facts, is in which party wanted the decision made public, that the court agreed with, and which party didn't imo
View attachment 56585
View attachment 56586
View attachment 56587
View attachment 56588
View attachment 56589
View attachment 56590
View attachment 56591
View attachment 56592
View attachment 56593
View attachment 56594
Click to expand...
Equities Club who have had some of the best coverage of AVZ to date have provide a mention in their latest weekly wrap here: https://articles.equitiesclub.com/p/weekly-wrap-gold-hits-high-copper
Previous article with an outlaid timeline available here: https://articles.equitiesclub.com/p/avz-minerals-asx
Devils advocate but they were pretty specific in saying no WRITTEN offer has been received - but amovotio could still be correct in a handshake or verbal negotiation could be underway/done.
Of course I wouldn’t just take a post on a forum as fact until AVZ comes out
Signed on what date ??
You could DM him on X, his name is amovatio, not amovotio.I would love to know The Australian’s source for their story. Is there any obligation for them to disclose if asked?
Speaking of information, I’d like to reach out to Amovotio directly but Hotcrapper doesn’t support this. I’m interested in knowing his or her updated view given AVZ‘s last statement that no written deal had been received came after their ‘deal is done’ post.
Are you referring to a "maybe" date key players converge at a specific location to sign on a dotted line ?On or around 10th April …??![]()
$6.2b USD
$6.2b USD
USD 6.243 billion to compensate for the complete destruction of the value of the Manono Project.