...So while the “international justice system” - a non existent fantasy entity you’ve referenced here is somehow on our side. The legal system under which we are operating does not agree. ...
2. Spurious in nature, again tough one. Again you’ve mentioned the fantasy international legal system, which to be clear does not exist. The term spurious implies that statements made are “not genuine or authentic” - Webster. Now let’s look at these non genuine statements. The statements are that zinjin have legal title over sections of the mine. Now if these statements are not genuine, again to be clear in the context of actual fact not “international legal system” then how do they now have rights to mine what was once our tenement...
,... I suggest we turn up the heat and stop blaming everyone else ...
Klaus is a wanker right, but he knows how to play it over there, ... And no I don’t see giving a bunch of abulance chasing lawyers 20million in promises as an action of any value other than ass covering.
I think you'll find there is a very real interntional justice system, one that I did not make up as a fantasy in my head.
Not "somehow" on our side, but based in the LAW it is on our side, it's not mysterious.
The DRC are signatories to these systems of law, that is to say, within the DRC law, they have agreed to be subject to the law and rulings of these interantional systems. And by this law Nigel, and the BoD have based their actions, reports and beliefs.
So the legal system DOES agree, but so far they have not been following that system.
Again you claim there is no international legal system, that it's a fantasy I made up, are you for real?
Zijin have apparent rights granted against what the law states, this is because corrupt entities have acted unlawfully, it's all very well documented and I'm 100% sure you know about this.
The statement of it being spurious was in reference to law, which it is.
Nigel can't be blamed for the law not being followed or enforced.
If I tell everyone that your car is in fact my car, and you tell everyone that it's not true, then I steal your car... well that makes you a liar according to you, because I have the car now.
So you're aware that the plan of those seeking to steal Manono is to turn shareholders against the BoD so they can be voted out in favor of people who will gift it to the chinese, and they're playing a long psy-ops campaign to trash Nigel and team?
Knowing this you think the best course of action is to "turn up the heat" and put more blame onto Nigel?
"Stop blaming everyone else"... so in other words stop blaming the people who acted on bribes against the law to block us?
I see you have favorable opinions on Klaus.
And lastly, I see you are against persuing our legal rights, and want to drop our legal action against the detractors?
The very same goals as MMGA again?
I think everyone here can draw their own conclusions from this.