The international justice system seems to agree that AVZ have good legal title to what they claim they own.
As do AVZ's lawyers.
As laymens, we can look at the merits of the claims, such as the sale by Dathomir, of which all conditions were met and therefore complete.
That means legal ownership of 75% despite what others claim.
So
@RHyNO you claim this is 1 of 2 "blatant lies told to shareholders"
You seem to have some knowledge about this that no one else does to call it a lie, can you elaborate what this information is please?
And the second "blatant lie" ties in with the first, but applies to the sale from Cominiere to Zijin.
Again, the international legal system so far seems to agree that the sale was illegal and had no merit, therefore is "spurious in nature", which also applies to Dathomirs claims to have cancelled the sale, when all legal conditions had already been met.
So can you explain how this was also a lie?
Otherwise would you care to retract your slanderous accusations toward the BoD?