dollarbills
Regular
I have less than 500 000 shares and got an email.. has everyone checked their spam? That’s where mine was .
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Mate consider yourself fukkin special.
I also received the generous offer from Jamie, got way less than 500k and I’m not that old….leads me to think the fucktards just got an incomplete list of shareholders…tried to reply back my response but it bounced
Attachments
Bin59
Regular
The Minister of Justice Rose Mutombo Kiese has lost her seat to Ms. Anne Mbuguje,
From memory MoJ left the IGF report sitting on her desk rather than forwarding the report to the courts for prosecution of those named in it.
econewsrdc.com
Taking advantage of her position in the outgoing government, Mrs. Rose Mutombo wants to usurp the seat of Anne Mbuguje won with 4 votes in the senatorial elections in the city of Kinshasa.
Taking advantage of her position as outgoing Minister of State for Justice, Mrs. Rose Mutombo, soundly defeated in the senatorial elections in the city of Kinshasa with barely two (2) votes, chose to appeal before the Court constitutional, Ms. Anne Mbuguje, elected to the regular senator of the city of Kinshasa, to steal her seat. The arguments brandished by Mrs. Rose Mutombo Kiese border on lightness. Opposite, Senator Anne Mbuguje, with her four votes in the senatorial elections, has sworn to fight, with legal arguments, to block the path to this imposture.
Ms. Rose Mutombo's attempt to seize the seat of senator for the city of Kinshasa, legitimately held by Ms. Anne Mbuguje, sparked a wave of indignation and disapproval within the Congolese political class. Indeed, the arguments put forward by Ms. Mutombo to contest the election of her competitor are considered not only unfounded, but also hypocritical.
Indeed, Ms. Mutombo attempted to call into question Ms. Mbuguje's Congolese nationality, arguing that she also held Belgian nationality. However, this accusation was quickly swept away by the fact that Ms. Mutombo, in her capacity as outgoing Minister of State for Justice, had herself certified the Congolese nationality of her rival a few days before the senatorial elections. It is therefore clear that this attempt at destabilization rests on fragile and hypocritical foundations.
Furthermore, the weak legitimacy of Ms. Mutombo, who obtained only two votes in the elections, compared to the four votes obtained by Ms. Mbuguje, underlines the opportunistic and malicious nature of her approach. It is clear that his attempt to cling to power by using his position as Minister of State for Justice to influence the Constitutional Court is reprehensible and unacceptable.
Faced with this attempt to manipulate justice, Ms. Mbuguje's entourage is determined to defend the legitimacy of her election and to denounce the malicious maneuvers of her competitor. They affirm that justice will not allow itself to be exploited and that the truth will ultimately triumph.
A request without clear evidence
In a bold but unfounded attempt, Rose Mutombo filed a request with the Constitutional Court alleging that Anne Mbuguje violated the law by running for the mandate of senator while she still held Belgian nationality. These allegations are based on Anne Mbuguje's alleged trip with a Belgian passport on May 10, despite her recovery of Congolese nationality in February 2024, attested by a document signed by Rose Mutombo herself.
However, at the hearing before the Constitutional Court, Rose Mutombo was unable to provide any tangible evidence to support her accusations. Despite the absence of any supporting documents, the Public Prosecutor's Office curiously took the side of supporting Mutombo's request, asking the Court to consider it admissible, thus going against Senator Mbuguje's rights.
As a former magistrate on the Council of State, Rose Mutombo should have remembered that the burden of proof lies with the applicant. This attempt at political destabilization, which seems to be tinged with influence peddling, only tarnishes the image of Congolese democracy for which the Congolese people have fought so much.
Rose Mutombo's attempt to seize the seat of Senator Anne Mbuguje is not only unfair, but also contrary to ethics and democracy. It is imperative that Congolese justice demonstrate independence and neutrality in this case to guarantee respect for the will of the people and the legitimacy of democratic institutions.
The Democratic Republic of Congo and its people deserve better than this kind of politico-judicial show based on unfounded allegations and dubious maneuvers. It is imperative that Congolese justice demonstrate independence and neutrality in this case in order to preserve the integrity of its institutions and respect for the rule of law.
The integrity of justice at stake
Once again, the constitutional judges of the Democratic Republic of Congo are faced with a crucial dilemma: to say the law impartially, without being influenced by external pressure. In a case between Ms. Anne Mbuguje and Ms. Rose Mutombo, the stakes are high: the legitimacy of the election of a senator and the integrity of Congolese democracy are at stake.
With two votes to four, the verdict is not the subject of discussion: justice must be done in all objectivity, respecting the fundamental principles of the rule of law. Ms. Rose Mutombo, by launching a request without evidence to the Constitutional Court, seems to engage in a battle lost in advance, built on fragile foundations.
It is stressed that Ms. Mutombo would be better inspired to continue her fight in Civil Society, which opened the doors of the Government to her, rather than engaging in dubious judicial maneuvers. The integrity of Congolese justice is at stake, and it is imperative that constitutional judges demonstrate independence and neutrality to preserve the confidence of the Congolese people in their institutions.
This meeting with history is an opportunity for the Constitutional Court to demonstrate its ability to resist political pressure and guarantee the rigorous application of the law. Respect for the rule of law and the preservation of Congolese democracy depends on the correctness and integrity of the decision that will be rendered in this case.
Econews.
drchmedia.org
During the day of May 16, the Constitutional Court gave its opinion on the current electoral disputes of some Honourable Senators.
As a result, she gave a favorable opinion by confirming the election of Me Anne MBUGUJE as Senator of Kinshasa while rejecting Mrs. Rose MUTOMBO's request.
From memory MoJ left the IGF report sitting on her desk rather than forwarding the report to the courts for prosecution of those named in it.
Sénatoriales : battue à plate couture à Kinshasa, Rose Mutombo remue ciel et terre pour usurper le siège d’Anne Mbuguje - L'info qui fait échos
Profitant de sa position de ministre d’Etat sortant de la Justice, Mme Rose Mutombo, battue à plate couture aux sénatoriales dans la ville de Kinshasa <a class="mh-excerpt-more"...
econewsrdc.com
Senatorial elections: soundly defeated in Kinshasa, Rose Mutombo moves heaven and earth to usurp Anne Mbuguje's seat
May 15, 2024 Faustin KUEDIASALA 0
Taking advantage of her position as outgoing Minister of State for Justice, Mrs. Rose Mutombo, soundly defeated in the senatorial elections in the city of Kinshasa with barely two (2) votes, chose to appeal before the Court constitutional, Ms. Anne Mbuguje, elected to the regular senator of the city of Kinshasa, to steal her seat. The arguments brandished by Mrs. Rose Mutombo Kiese border on lightness. Opposite, Senator Anne Mbuguje, with her four votes in the senatorial elections, has sworn to fight, with legal arguments, to block the path to this imposture.
Ms. Rose Mutombo's attempt to seize the seat of senator for the city of Kinshasa, legitimately held by Ms. Anne Mbuguje, sparked a wave of indignation and disapproval within the Congolese political class. Indeed, the arguments put forward by Ms. Mutombo to contest the election of her competitor are considered not only unfounded, but also hypocritical.
Indeed, Ms. Mutombo attempted to call into question Ms. Mbuguje's Congolese nationality, arguing that she also held Belgian nationality. However, this accusation was quickly swept away by the fact that Ms. Mutombo, in her capacity as outgoing Minister of State for Justice, had herself certified the Congolese nationality of her rival a few days before the senatorial elections. It is therefore clear that this attempt at destabilization rests on fragile and hypocritical foundations.
Furthermore, the weak legitimacy of Ms. Mutombo, who obtained only two votes in the elections, compared to the four votes obtained by Ms. Mbuguje, underlines the opportunistic and malicious nature of her approach. It is clear that his attempt to cling to power by using his position as Minister of State for Justice to influence the Constitutional Court is reprehensible and unacceptable.
Faced with this attempt to manipulate justice, Ms. Mbuguje's entourage is determined to defend the legitimacy of her election and to denounce the malicious maneuvers of her competitor. They affirm that justice will not allow itself to be exploited and that the truth will ultimately triumph.
A request without clear evidence
In a bold but unfounded attempt, Rose Mutombo filed a request with the Constitutional Court alleging that Anne Mbuguje violated the law by running for the mandate of senator while she still held Belgian nationality. These allegations are based on Anne Mbuguje's alleged trip with a Belgian passport on May 10, despite her recovery of Congolese nationality in February 2024, attested by a document signed by Rose Mutombo herself.
However, at the hearing before the Constitutional Court, Rose Mutombo was unable to provide any tangible evidence to support her accusations. Despite the absence of any supporting documents, the Public Prosecutor's Office curiously took the side of supporting Mutombo's request, asking the Court to consider it admissible, thus going against Senator Mbuguje's rights.
As a former magistrate on the Council of State, Rose Mutombo should have remembered that the burden of proof lies with the applicant. This attempt at political destabilization, which seems to be tinged with influence peddling, only tarnishes the image of Congolese democracy for which the Congolese people have fought so much.
Rose Mutombo's attempt to seize the seat of Senator Anne Mbuguje is not only unfair, but also contrary to ethics and democracy. It is imperative that Congolese justice demonstrate independence and neutrality in this case to guarantee respect for the will of the people and the legitimacy of democratic institutions.
The Democratic Republic of Congo and its people deserve better than this kind of politico-judicial show based on unfounded allegations and dubious maneuvers. It is imperative that Congolese justice demonstrate independence and neutrality in this case in order to preserve the integrity of its institutions and respect for the rule of law.
The integrity of justice at stake
Once again, the constitutional judges of the Democratic Republic of Congo are faced with a crucial dilemma: to say the law impartially, without being influenced by external pressure. In a case between Ms. Anne Mbuguje and Ms. Rose Mutombo, the stakes are high: the legitimacy of the election of a senator and the integrity of Congolese democracy are at stake.
With two votes to four, the verdict is not the subject of discussion: justice must be done in all objectivity, respecting the fundamental principles of the rule of law. Ms. Rose Mutombo, by launching a request without evidence to the Constitutional Court, seems to engage in a battle lost in advance, built on fragile foundations.
It is stressed that Ms. Mutombo would be better inspired to continue her fight in Civil Society, which opened the doors of the Government to her, rather than engaging in dubious judicial maneuvers. The integrity of Congolese justice is at stake, and it is imperative that constitutional judges demonstrate independence and neutrality to preserve the confidence of the Congolese people in their institutions.
This meeting with history is an opportunity for the Constitutional Court to demonstrate its ability to resist political pressure and guarantee the rigorous application of the law. Respect for the rule of law and the preservation of Congolese democracy depends on the correctness and integrity of the decision that will be rendered in this case.
Econews.
Confirmed:
SÉNAT : LA COUR CONSTITUTIONNELLE TRANCHE SUR LE CONTENTIEUX ÉLECTORAL DE QUELQUES SÉNATEURS - DRC Humanitarian Media
Au cours de la journée du 16 Mai, la Cour Constitutionnelle a donné son avis sur les Contentieux électoraux en cours de quelques Honorables Sénateurs. De ce fait, elle a donné un avis favorable en confirmant l'élection du Me Anne MBUGUJE en tant Sénatrice de Kinshasa tout en rejetant la requête...
drchmedia.org
During the day of May 16, the Constitutional Court gave its opinion on the current electoral disputes of some Honourable Senators.
As a result, she gave a favorable opinion by confirming the election of Me Anne MBUGUJE as Senator of Kinshasa while rejecting Mrs. Rose MUTOMBO's request.
Winenut
Go AVZ!
I suspect the shareholders that got touched up by a special fucking email from Ja’mie
were the ones that had email addresses on their file with Automic.
Between the good wife and myself we’ve got a significant holding but no contact from Ja’mie and i think it’s because we’ve never provided an email address to the registry…..lucky us
were the ones that had email addresses on their file with Automic.
Between the good wife and myself we’ve got a significant holding but no contact from Ja’mie and i think it’s because we’ve never provided an email address to the registry…..lucky us
Cumquat Cap
Regular
Rose Mutumbo is a corrupt Wench, sat on the IGF report and our MoU purposely. All under instruction from Felix or Lukonde no doubt
Bray
Regular
So the drama continues hahaha FML
Hemicuda
Regular
Same here nut,,
TheCount
Regular
I don't believe so. Have had my details with Automic from day 1, received the MMGA etc etc didn't get one from jamie. Don't care really - not selling. Have to wait for the court case if it ever gets that far - highly unlikely though.....
TC.
Mute22
Regular
Likewise, I was already registered circa no contact.
My concern about those Sino-MMGA rodents who are seeking to buy millions of shares for SFA is not so much their opportunism or exploitation of desperate holders, but their potentially accumulated voting power. If successful. they will seek to roll the board at the next AGM, and replace it with a China-friendly one. If it happens, it's game over.
Cheers
F
Blood minerals they worried about? Or lack of palm greasing and paper bags.
finance.yahoo.com
Congo lawyers say they have new evidence on Apple's minerals supply chain
PARIS (Reuters) -International lawyers representing the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo said on Wednesday they had new evidence gathered from whistleblowers, which deepened concerns that Apple could be sourcing minerals from conflict areas in eastern Congo. In a statement, the...
finance.yahoo.com
Interesting recent synopsis from August Cohen on X:
"I absolutely agree that time is running out for the parties to this drama to resolve this situation amicably. But, to be very clear, what will never change are the facts of the case, which you do not seem to know or fully understand. Yes, it's true that AVZ took 5 years to develop a project which is located in a particularly inaccessible part of the Congo. But it is also a fact that it requested and successfully obtained the extensions from the Ministry of Mines to which it is entitled under article 77 of the Mining Code and the conditions set out in articles 37 to 42. But it is also a fact true that, despite the authorization of these extensions for these 5 years, the Ministry of Mines revoked the exploration permit on the grounds that AVZ had not respected the prior deadlines, which contradicted its own authorizations to extend these time limit. Additionally, the ministry did not follow several procedures set out in the Mining Code before issuing a revocation. For example, the Department of Mines must produce a report that clearly documents that an exploration permit holder has failed to meet agreed deadlines and any extensions and make it available to the permit holder. Well, where is the report on AVZ? In a few weeks, the arbitral bodies in Paris and Washington DC will be confronted with these facts against the claims of the parties. It will evaluate the evidence against the claims, make a decision that either party has breached its contractual obligations to each other, and award damages likely in excess of $1 billion to be paid by the party loser. For the sake of the Congolese people, I hope that the DRC government will avoid indulging in the lies and insults that have characterized your responses in this thread, because the arbiters do not care about feelings, geopolitics or " imperialism” from anyone on this issue. They only care about the facts."
"I absolutely agree that time is running out for the parties to this drama to resolve this situation amicably. But, to be very clear, what will never change are the facts of the case, which you do not seem to know or fully understand. Yes, it's true that AVZ took 5 years to develop a project which is located in a particularly inaccessible part of the Congo. But it is also a fact that it requested and successfully obtained the extensions from the Ministry of Mines to which it is entitled under article 77 of the Mining Code and the conditions set out in articles 37 to 42. But it is also a fact true that, despite the authorization of these extensions for these 5 years, the Ministry of Mines revoked the exploration permit on the grounds that AVZ had not respected the prior deadlines, which contradicted its own authorizations to extend these time limit. Additionally, the ministry did not follow several procedures set out in the Mining Code before issuing a revocation. For example, the Department of Mines must produce a report that clearly documents that an exploration permit holder has failed to meet agreed deadlines and any extensions and make it available to the permit holder. Well, where is the report on AVZ? In a few weeks, the arbitral bodies in Paris and Washington DC will be confronted with these facts against the claims of the parties. It will evaluate the evidence against the claims, make a decision that either party has breached its contractual obligations to each other, and award damages likely in excess of $1 billion to be paid by the party loser. For the sake of the Congolese people, I hope that the DRC government will avoid indulging in the lies and insults that have characterized your responses in this thread, because the arbiters do not care about feelings, geopolitics or " imperialism” from anyone on this issue. They only care about the facts."
Dave Evans
Regular
Looks like the above message was from a scammer who later changed his profile from Tshisekedi’s son to Anthony Nkinzo Kamole who is Tshisekedi’s Director of his Cabinet
Rose Mutombo also made contact a while back but wouldn’t respond when I asked her if she had been holding onto the MOU since she had a visit from the stooges so after reading @Bin59 post, possibly another corrupt minister down
Last edited:
Prod
Emerged
I agree, I've also been registered with Automic and didn't receive any emails from Jamie (and nothing in my spam folder) as I mentioned earlier I do have several different entities and the only correspondence I had received back in the day from the maggots (MMGA) was in the holdings of our individual names, not our joint names nor my superfund. My son who's 3yrs old could've run a better marketing campaign than these guys. They're a complete joke.
That Rose account asked for cash too.
Was from a whatsapp number the twitter account gave me. I'll have a look for it.
Similar threads
