AVZ Discussion 2022

[Panther22]

Thank goodness Fortescue is out of that arrangement. I have plenty of shares in them too. Last thing l need is another future shit show. Fortescue should count themselves lucky IMO, clearly they have not been keeping up with what is happening with AVZ.

 

[Spikerama]

With all the time in the world mate I would but I have a short time frame to push something out so if someone had it at their fingertips I could focus on the creative.

 

[cruiser51]

With all the time in the world mate I would but I have a short time frame to push something out so if someone had it at their fingertips I could focus on the creative.

x.com

x.com

 

[Spikerama]

x.com

x.com

Awesome thanks Cruiser

 

[Dave Evans]

Anyone have that video of the Chinese foreman beating the Congolese workers? Or something similar?

I want to make something for the X-warriors.

Awesome thanks Cruiser

There’s also this one

 

[Spikerama]

There’s also this one Spike

Yeah I remember that. Good cheers.

 

[Thaz]

My thoughts are the opposite, they're targeting shareholders with a larger number of shares (500,000+ ?) and only offering to pick them up on the cheap. They're looking to get in a bulk supply on the cheap and don't want to do so by dealing with thousands of mini-transactions. Imagine picking up $2M shares for $2k after shorting at $0.80 - $1.00 level. Or buying and then this gets back to $1+ps valuation on selling the asset or coming out of this shitshow with the DRC. Insane.

Purely targeting the potentially large holders who aren't paying attention and hoping for a panic sell. I would rather suck a dog's fart direct from the source than take an offer of $0.001. Rather it just went to zero

I think i got targeted because i have a bal of >500K ... and i'm chinese

 

[Dave Evans]

My thoughts are the opposite, they're targeting shareholders with a larger number of shares (500,000+ ?) and only offering to pick them up on the cheap. They're looking to get in a bulk supply on the cheap and don't want to do so by dealing with thousands of mini-transactions. Imagine picking up $2M shares for $2k after shorting at $0.80 - $1.00 level. Or buying and then this gets back to $1+ps valuation on selling the asset or coming out of this shitshow with the DRC. Insane.

Purely targeting the potentially large holders who aren't paying attention and hoping for a panic sell. I would rather suck a dog's fart direct from the source than take an offer of $0.001. Rather it just went to zero

I suspect shareholder’s SMSF were amongst those Jamie Mitchell targeted. It’s also possible he included a number of other shareholders in his emails which I believe violates privacy as well as ASIC laws

 

[Azzler]

Announcement out Re: this (purported, lol) Mitchell cunt.

 

[Hudnut]

If anyone was selling 500,000 shares for $500, I'd buy them in my SMSF.
Better odds than a lotto ticket into a tax advantaged environment I reckon.

 

[antimatter]

If anyone was selling 500,000 shares for $500, I'd buy them in my SMSF.
Better odds than a lotto ticket into a tax advantaged environment I reckon.

Heck, I am willing to pay 10 times $500 for 500,000 shares.

 

[BRICK]

Heck, I am willing to pay 10 times $500 for 500,000 shares.

Yep same here

 

[wombat74]

Heck, I am willing to pay 10 times $500 for 500,000 shares.

I'll do the same , plus , I'll throw in 5 nights at the Fleuve Congo Hotel Kinshasa with breakfasts included and late check out .

 

[Samus]

 

[Prod]

I suspect shareholder’s SMSF were amongst those Jamie Mitchell targeted. It’s also possible he included a number of other shareholders in his emails which violates privacy as well as ASIC laws

From memory, Super Funds are an area where dudbrook has experience

Dave, I'm not sure how or who's been targeted by these guys (dipsticks) I have well over 500,000+ shares in each of my entities superfund, individual and joint names and yet no email received from them, not that I'm complaining. I can't help but think that AVZ and the board must still be in a position of power/influence otherwise why would these pricks still be wanting to purchase our shares??? Just a thought and my opinion.

 

[oxxa23]

I suspect shareholder’s SMSF were amongst those Jamie Mitchell targeted. It’s also possible he included a number of other shareholders in his emails which violates privacy as well as ASIC laws

From memory, Super Funds are an area where dudbrook has experience

Part of me says target those that could be more elderly and not willing to wait it out... which could be those in smsf... but, plenty of younger people have smsf's also...

 

[oxxa23]

If anyone was selling 500,000 shares for $500, I'd buy them in my SMSF.
Better odds than a lotto ticket into a tax advantaged environment I reckon.

Fyi only, Just for those of you that want to transfer avz shares into your smsf... can't do it while unlisted... have to acquire from an unrelated party to do so....

So as long as auditor and ato don't find out about it you can always do a dealnwith someone else wanting to do the same thing.... you buy theirs, they buy yours...

 

[LX600]

Fyi only, Just for those of you that want to transfer avz shares into your smsf... can't do it while unlisted... have to acquire from an unrelated party to do so....

So as long as auditor and ato don't find out about it you can always do a dealnwith someone else wanting to do the same thing.... you buy theirs, they buy yours...

Who want to be my buddy?

 

[Spikerama]

I'll do the same , plus , I'll throw in 5 nights at the Fleuve Congo Hotel Kinshasa with breakfasts included and late check out .

Fuck you are a funny bugger Wombat. I gotta give you that.

 

[BRICK]

Fuck you are a funny bugger Wombat. I gotta give you that.

Thank fuck for the funny fuckers on here to keep us smiling!