Truly don't understand Ludbrook's logic here.
He's trying to get shareholders to trust he is acting in their best interests.
However, "Get me appointed to the board to protect AVZ's assets", and, "AVZ's assets are lost and fucked" are mutually exclusive.
If the assets are lost, any logical holder would deduce there would be no value in him being involved as all would be lost already.
So why would he still be interested?
Well, he must benefit from another source of revenue.
I wonder what that could be?