Mr_Tones83
Regular
Before everyone panics... Zijin/Jin Cheng not having jurisdiction at ICC is what we wanted declared. We asked for the case to be split into 2 parts - jurisdiction and merits because we knew the case would be quashed on jurisdiction and no need for merits to be heard (7SUR7.CD claims that ICC wouldn't deal with issues of corruption etc. because AVZ lost, this is not the case, it just comes under merits and not jurisdiction).
This means a few things:
- ICC will still deal with the stake purportedly sold by Cominiere to Jin Cheng as this was wrongdoing by Cominiere who is a valid JV partner. This is part of AVZ's separate case against Cominiere.
- The combined case of damages brought by Jin Cheng and Cominiere at ICC will also be done on no jurisdiction due to Jin Cheng not being a JV partner.
The Chinese will always put their spin on the outcome, but we have seen their BS in the past. 7SUR7.CD has always been linked to Kibeya's propaganda, so don't listen to their lies.
Tommy will probably also just quote Zijin.
Wait to hear what the company has to say about it all before jumping to conclusions.
This means a few things:
- ICC will still deal with the stake purportedly sold by Cominiere to Jin Cheng as this was wrongdoing by Cominiere who is a valid JV partner. This is part of AVZ's separate case against Cominiere.
- The combined case of damages brought by Jin Cheng and Cominiere at ICC will also be done on no jurisdiction due to Jin Cheng not being a JV partner.
The Chinese will always put their spin on the outcome, but we have seen their BS in the past. 7SUR7.CD has always been linked to Kibeya's propaganda, so don't listen to their lies.
Tommy will probably also just quote Zijin.
Wait to hear what the company has to say about it all before jumping to conclusions.
Last edited: