AVZ Discussion 2022

Cumquat Cap

Regular
Jags on the vinegar strokes
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 7 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Not really sure how to post translated version. Feel free to repost if you know how.
Try screenshot

I can tell you how to do it on an apple, not a pear
 
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 4 users

Rediah

Regular
Not really sure how to post translated version. Feel free to repost if you know how.
Screen Shot 2024-03-18 at 7.13.47 pm.png


Screen Shot 2024-03-18 at 7.13.29 pm.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 9 users

Dazmac66

Regular
Try screenshot

I can tell you how to do it on an apple, not a pear
I run Android not a lemon! haha. There we go, thanks Rediah.
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 2 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Try screenshot

I can tell you how to do it on an apple, not a pear
Go the Pear! 🍐
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

CashKing

Regular
Regarding the negative nellies on other sites…..

They are negative because they know my left nut right now feels goooooooooood 👌

ball puppet GIF
Fuck that wasn’t my best go to w@nk but yolo cunts…

Tbag prob jerks off over he’s “Journalism” 😂 🤷‍♂️

GLTAH FFS 🤦

AIMO
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users

CHB

Regular
Sounds like we won the jurisdictional challenge woot


(Yicai) March 18 -- The dispute between a unit of Chinese mining giant Zijin Mining and Australia's AVZ Minerals over an unrecognized stake in the Manono lithium-and-tin project in the Democratic Republic of Congo will be heard by a DRC court, rather than the International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration.

The ICC released its decision that it does not have jurisdiction to hear the case between Jincheng Mining and AVZ, Fujian province-based Zijin Mining announced today.

JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ in May 2022 after the Australian company failed to recognize Zijin Mining's purchase of a stake in Dathcom Mining, a joint venture controlled by AVZ which was granted the mining rights to the Manono project by the DRC government.

"This decision does not reflect on the merits of our case, but rather a redirection of legal proceedings," said Chen Chen, Zijin Mining's in-house legal counsel. “It signifies the ICC's inability to hear the matter at this time, which will now be raised in the local legal jurisdiction of the DRC.”

Zijin Mining remains confident in its ability to uphold the rights of all stakeholders involved and to ensure a fair resolution to this dispute through the DRC legal system, the company noted.

The Manono project is one of the world's largest lithium-rich LCT (lithium, cesium, tantalum) pegmatite deposits.

Dathcom was founded in 2016, with AVZ holding 60 percent, DRC government-owned Cominière 25 percent, and Dathomir Mining Resources the remaining 15 percent.

Zijin Mining kicked off negotiations with Cominière in June 2021 to acquire a 15 percent stake in Dathcom. The deal was inked and approved by the local government in November 2021.

However, after Zijin Mining's announcement of the deal, AVZ refused to acknowledge the Chinese company as a shareholder of Dathcom. Therefore, JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ over the validity of the stake it acquired in Dathomir in May 2022.

Will Celestin's wife be preceding over this one too?

:rolleyes:
:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users
Sounds like we won the jurisdictional challenge woot


(Yicai) March 18 -- The dispute between a unit of Chinese mining giant Zijin Mining and Australia's AVZ Minerals over an unrecognized stake in the Manono lithium-and-tin project in the Democratic Republic of Congo will be heard by a DRC court, rather than the International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration.

The ICC released its decision that it does not have jurisdiction to hear the case between Jincheng Mining and AVZ, Fujian province-based Zijin Mining announced today.

JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ in May 2022 after the Australian company failed to recognize Zijin Mining's purchase of a stake in Dathcom Mining, a joint venture controlled by AVZ which was granted the mining rights to the Manono project by the DRC government.

"This decision does not reflect on the merits of our case, but rather a redirection of legal proceedings," said Chen Chen, Zijin Mining's in-house legal counsel. “It signifies the ICC's inability to hear the matter at this time, which will now be raised in the local legal jurisdiction of the DRC.”

Zijin Mining remains confident in its ability to uphold the rights of all stakeholders involved and to ensure a fair resolution to this dispute through the DRC legal system, the company noted.

The Manono project is one of the world's largest lithium-rich LCT (lithium, cesium, tantalum) pegmatite deposits.

Dathcom was founded in 2016, with AVZ holding 60 percent, DRC government-owned Cominière 25 percent, and Dathomir Mining Resources the remaining 15 percent.

Zijin Mining kicked off negotiations with Cominière in June 2021 to acquire a 15 percent stake in Dathcom. The deal was inked and approved by the local government in November 2021.

However, after Zijin Mining's announcement of the deal, AVZ refused to acknowledge the Chinese company as a shareholder of Dathcom. Therefore, JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ over the validity of the stake it acquired in Dathomir in May 2022.
Weren't we hoping for ICC to determine the transfer to Zijin to be null and void? Reads to me that they've just determined they (ICC) don't have jurisdiction over the case and thus deferring it to 'local legal jurisdiction of the DRC' ? Which would be shit given corruption of local courts.

But idk I lose track of all the various disputes
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 9 users

Frank

Top 20
1710763878058.png



1710763908418.png



1710764020683.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 21 users

CHB

Regular
Weren't we hoping for ICC to determine the transfer to Zijin to be null and void? Reads to me that they've just determined they (ICC) don't have jurisdiction over the case and thus deferring it to 'local legal jurisdiction of the DRC' ? Which would be shit given corruption of local courts.

But idk I lose track of all the various disputes

I was just looking through it again and I think it's a bit of this..

I think if you go by the law then not having jurisdiction means that Zijin don't have a share in Dathcom which is an absolute positive.

However...the fallback position seems to be DRC courts...which if worked properly would carry on the verdict from ICC implying that they're not a part of Dathcom..but well..its DRC..so.......another shitfight...??

Also reading between the lines, if they end up winning in DRC courts, sounds like ICC still won't ultimately acknowledge their participation in Dathcom anyway?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 6 users

Charbella

Regular
We were asking the ICC not to hear the case as Jin Cheng is not, and never has been, a party of Dathcom and therefore they have no right to recourse through the ICC under Article 11 of the Dathcom JVA

Zijin's lawyers can chat as much shit as they want. This is a massive L for them if true considering they initiated these proceedings.

View attachment 59326
View attachment 59327
View attachment 59328
Chen Chen is still talking trash. Wouldn't it be nice to claim a few billion dollars in damages for delaying the project for 2 years with the intention to continue stalling the project after a massive loss?

Let us not forget that Jin Cheng claims that the Company has breached the Dathcom Joint Venture Agreement (Dathcom JVA), entitling the Claimants to the following principal relief: a claim of damages, estimated provisionally at US$850M for Jin Cheng and US$566M for Cominiere.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users
I was just looking through it again and I think it's a bit of this..

I think if you go by the law then not having jurisdiction means that Zijin don't have a share in Dathcom which is an absolute positive.

However...the fallback position seems to be DRC courts...which if worked properly would carry on the verdict from ICC implying that they're not a part of Dathcom..but well..its DRC..so.......another shitfight...??

Also reading between the lines, if they end up winning in DRC courts, sounds like ICC still won't ultimately acknowledge their participation in Dathcom anyway?
We were asking the ICC not to hear the case as Jin Cheng is not, and never has been, a party of Dathcom and therefore they have no right to recourse through the ICC under Article 11 of the Dathcom JVA

Zijin's lawyers can chat as much shit as they want. This is a massive L for them if true considering they initiated these proceedings.

View attachment 59326
View attachment 59327
View attachment 59328
Ah I see. Thankyou. Yes definitely a nice win there. Fuck Zijin
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

aanti.dumb

Regular
Sounds like we won the jurisdictional challenge woot


(Yicai) March 18 -- The dispute between a unit of Chinese mining giant Zijin Mining and Australia's AVZ Minerals over an unrecognized stake in the Manono lithium-and-tin project in the Democratic Republic of Congo will be heard by a DRC court, rather than the International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration.

The ICC released its decision that it does not have jurisdiction to hear the case between Jincheng Mining and AVZ, Fujian province-based Zijin Mining announced today.

JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ in May 2022 after the Australian company failed to recognize Zijin Mining's purchase of a stake in Dathcom Mining, a joint venture controlled by AVZ which was granted the mining rights to the Manono project by the DRC government.

"This decision does not reflect on the merits of our case, but rather a redirection of legal proceedings," said Chen Chen, Zijin Mining's in-house legal counsel. “It signifies the ICC's inability to hear the matter at this time, which will now be raised in the local legal jurisdiction of the DRC.”

Zijin Mining remains confident in its ability to uphold the rights of all stakeholders involved and to ensure a fair resolution to this dispute through the DRC legal system, the company noted.

The Manono project is one of the world's largest lithium-rich LCT (lithium, cesium, tantalum) pegmatite deposits.

Dathcom was founded in 2016, with AVZ holding 60 percent, DRC government-owned Cominière 25 percent, and Dathomir Mining Resources the remaining 15 percent.

Zijin Mining kicked off negotiations with Cominière in June 2021 to acquire a 15 percent stake in Dathcom. The deal was inked and approved by the local government in November 2021.

However, after Zijin Mining's announcement of the deal, AVZ refused to acknowledge the Chinese company as a shareholder of Dathcom. Therefore, JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ over the validity of the stake it acquired in Dathomir in May 2022.
This article (if true) seems to be regarding this announcement from OCT 2023 where AVZ didn't want ICC to hear the arguments from Zijin re 15% ownership as AVZ claim they are not share holders of Dathcom. So looks to be another (small) win for AVZ. Zijin will likely start proceedings in the corrupt DRC legal system so who knows where this goes next.

A small battle won in the war for Manono.
1710765556200.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Sounds like we won the jurisdictional challenge woot


(Yicai) March 18 -- The dispute between a unit of Chinese mining giant Zijin Mining and Australia's AVZ Minerals over an unrecognized stake in the Manono lithium-and-tin project in the Democratic Republic of Congo will be heard by a DRC court, rather than the International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration.

The ICC released its decision that it does not have jurisdiction to hear the case between Jincheng Mining and AVZ, Fujian province-based Zijin Mining announced today.

JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ in May 2022 after the Australian company failed to recognize Zijin Mining's purchase of a stake in Dathcom Mining, a joint venture controlled by AVZ which was granted the mining rights to the Manono project by the DRC government.

"This decision does not reflect on the merits of our case, but rather a redirection of legal proceedings," said Chen Chen, Zijin Mining's in-house legal counsel. “It signifies the ICC's inability to hear the matter at this time, which will now be raised in the local legal jurisdiction of the DRC.”

Zijin Mining remains confident in its ability to uphold the rights of all stakeholders involved and to ensure a fair resolution to this dispute through the DRC legal system, the company noted.

The Manono project is one of the world's largest lithium-rich LCT (lithium, cesium, tantalum) pegmatite deposits.

Dathcom was founded in 2016, with AVZ holding 60 percent, DRC government-owned Cominière 25 percent, and Dathomir Mining Resources the remaining 15 percent.

Zijin Mining kicked off negotiations with Cominière in June 2021 to acquire a 15 percent stake in Dathcom. The deal was inked and approved by the local government in November 2021.

However, after Zijin Mining's announcement of the deal, AVZ refused to acknowledge the Chinese company as a shareholder of Dathcom. Therefore, JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ over the validity of the stake it acquired in Dathomir in May 2022.
WTF are you saying here???

It seems the absolute opposite to what we're after
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
WTF are you saying here???

It seems the absolute opposite to what we're after
It heads back to the DRC courts because ICC don't have jurisdiction.

I get the technicalities but fuck me

Send it back to the DRC??? Celestin's wife, corrupt fucking courts, brown paper bags!!!!

You have to be fucking kidding

I get Jin Cheng don't get a win at the ICC but the fucking wash up is like winning the fucking golden trophy then you have to drink liquid fucking shit from it on the podium
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

obe wan

Regular
WTF are you saying here???

It seems the absolute opposite to what we're after
ICC don’t have jurisdiction to hear it , as Zijin aren’t on the Dathcom registery ; they have no claim just like AVZ have said all along .

Zijin can go back and try the DRC route , but ICC have basically confirmed they are not on the registery / not a shareholder of Dathcom ; then we have that AVZ V Cominere decision to come which I’d assume Zijins avenue through DRC courts could only happen after that decision is announced ; cominieres chances of winning that after whats just happened here, would be paper thin.

They can’t really get a DRC hearing if Cominiere have been proved to be a lying bunch of pricks who couldn’t even sort out a register for their friends Zijin and who have basically wasted everyone’s time.…( wasting time was also an intent )

If this Chinese version is out now, then highly likely we’ll have an announcement in the morning ; no doubt it will read a bit clearer than this Chinese sourced article

Roll on cominiere
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 37 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Anyone thought for a second that Jin Cheng/Zijin "wanted" the ICC to find they don't have jurisdiction on the matter so it ensured the case is heard back in the "good old DRC/brown paper bag land" where influence can be easily bought and ministers, bureaucrats and more importantly "judges" decisons are just a stack of Yuan away?

Maybe Celestin's wife can preside over the court in this matter as she has in others before

Fuck me....
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 5 users

BEISHA

Top 20
Sounds like we won the jurisdictional challenge woot


(Yicai) March 18 -- The dispute between a unit of Chinese mining giant Zijin Mining and Australia's AVZ Minerals over an unrecognized stake in the Manono lithium-and-tin project in the Democratic Republic of Congo will be heard by a DRC court, rather than the International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration.

The ICC released its decision that it does not have jurisdiction to hear the case between Jincheng Mining and AVZ, Fujian province-based Zijin Mining announced today.

JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ in May 2022 after the Australian company failed to recognize Zijin Mining's purchase of a stake in Dathcom Mining, a joint venture controlled by AVZ which was granted the mining rights to the Manono project by the DRC government.

"This decision does not reflect on the merits of our case, but rather a redirection of legal proceedings," said Chen Chen, Zijin Mining's in-house legal counsel. “It signifies the ICC's inability to hear the matter at this time, which will now be raised in the local legal jurisdiction of the DRC.”

Zijin Mining remains confident in its ability to uphold the rights of all stakeholders involved and to ensure a fair resolution to this dispute through the DRC legal system, the company noted.

The Manono project is one of the world's largest lithium-rich LCT (lithium, cesium, tantalum) pegmatite deposits.

Dathcom was founded in 2016, with AVZ holding 60 percent, DRC government-owned Cominière 25 percent, and Dathomir Mining Resources the remaining 15 percent.

Zijin Mining kicked off negotiations with Cominière in June 2021 to acquire a 15 percent stake in Dathcom. The deal was inked and approved by the local government in November 2021.

However, after Zijin Mining's announcement of the deal, AVZ refused to acknowledge the Chinese company as a shareholder of Dathcom. Therefore, JCM launched an ICC case against AVZ over the validity of the stake it acquired in Dathomir in May 2022.
benny-hill-wtf.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
ICC don’t have jurisdiction to hear it , as Zijin aren’t on the Dathcom registery ; they have no claim just like AVZ have said all along .

Zijin can go back and try the DRC route , but ICC have confirmed they are not on the registery ; then we have that AVZ V Cominere decision to come which I’d assume Zijins avenue through DRC courts could only happen after that decision is announced ; cominieres chances of winning that after whats just happened here, would be paper thin.

They can’t really get a DRC hearing if Cominiere have been proved to be a lying bunch of pricks who couldn’t even get sort out a register for their friends Zijin and who have basically wasted everyone’s time .

Roll on cominiere

Did they confirm Zijin/Jin Cheng (whateva) are not on the Dathcom registery or did the ICC simply confirm they don't have any fucking jurisdiction in the matter whatsoever?????

ie .... like ....well....ummm.....we really like what everyone's got to say but ....well....ummm......but .......ummm......it's really "nothing to do with us"
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 3 users

BEISHA

Top 20
It heads back to the DRC courts because ICC don't have jurisdiction.

I get the technicalities but fuck me

Send it back to the DRC??? Celestin's wife, corrupt fucking courts, brown paper bags!!!!

You have to be fucking kidding

I get Jin Cheng don't get a win at the ICC but the fucking wash up is like winning the fucking golden trophy then you have to drink liquid fucking shit from it on the podium
days of our lives.gif


face-palm-omg.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Top Bottom