Can't have been anyone from the AFR if they gave off journo vibes.
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Can't have been anyone from the AFR if they gave off journo vibes.
Samus
Top 20
We got betrayed by Mr pee pees.
I was in the same row. He was passing me when he started turning on the drama about his phone.
He is a LTH. I have spoken to him at length at a previous major shareholders event.
I was surprised to see him "passing notes" with the MMGA lawyer. And even more surprised by the question he asked re due diligence around Locke, which seemed to demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of the situation. And Nigel called him on it nicely.
I don't think he's a journo, but I could have that wrong. Wouldn't be the first time haha. I guess if Tom Richardson can be called a journo it's not setting the bar very high.
exactly, surely not everyone was sidetracked by the MMGA saga
Chilla
Regular
They would never discuss those items at the AGM which was primarily dealing with an existential threat to the assets of the company by the Chinese attempting a board coup. You don’t open the hen house to let the wolves have a massacre.
Whilst we are frustrated and devoid of lots of information….that information is extremely sensitive and is being sought by the corrupt Chinese to use against us and steal our asset.
You need to understand when it’s appropriate to ask certain questions and when it’s not. This is not that time.
Carlos Danger
Top 20
A bloke up the front on the left asked about this. (poor guy, it took him about four goes to get his first question in - "sorry sir that question is not applicable to this section of the meeting" - added a bit of comic relief to the proceedings at least).
Anyway, where was I?
Yes, the question was asked and the response from what I recall was a standard Nigel vague answer along the lines of "yes we are looking into cost cutting measures wherever available" or something to that effect.
From memory (yes that thing again), the question was bundled in with a remuneration question as well so there was a pre-scripted part to the answer. It was along the lines of stuff we've already heard about cash bonuses to compensate for spending lots of time abroad.
There certainly wasn't any talk of executive pay cuts.
Maybe just going back to Blend 43...
They was my recollection - they all sat at about 33 for, 66 against.
And the board was all pretty comfortable except for JC who was only borderline for.
you're right, unless of course we lose in court and dont regain our asset, obviously we all hope it doesnt get to that
even if we win, well, lets see how this chinese owned jungle reacts to that in relation to what happens on the ground, these dirty dogs have been relentless so far and I'd imagine we'll need some decent dollars alloted to security of a mine and personnel
Last edited:
The attacks will only cease when you refuse to let it rile you. It's only really a handful anyway. Consider them unreconstructed bogans with all the gravitas of girly TicTockers and led by a schizophrenic sock-puppet. Works for me.agreed, would love nothing more when the attacks cease
Winenut
Go AVZ!
Good questions from the other Nut......but not necessarily to be answered at this particular time
Time now is to consolidate the respects and wishes of the AVZ shareholders as indicated by the voting at the AGM
And by the way .....#FuckMMGA..... right up the fucking arse
Glad I didn't go then. All we need to know is the results of resolution voting if they are going to tell us SFA about the actual operations of the business I part own and what our employees have been doing for a few years until I eventually find out whether it's worth anything in the end.
I'd like to know when they can be answered.
Carlos Danger
Top 20
Misfits
Regular
100% Chilla. Finally someone else gets it. Silly people including the owl on HC have been ridiculing why no formal Q and A.
kron
Regular
That is a very thorough summary for those that missed out. Also, it wasn't a free for all for questions. The format of the meeting was questions were only taken for each resolution in the AGM pamphlet. Firstly was questions about the Annual report document, after that was renumeration package followed by individual candidates. If you wanted an answer outside of this you had to phrase it creatively...
Winenut
Go AVZ!
It's incredible isn't it
Who'd have thought that posters on HC would be complete and utter fucking retards.......
Why even bother about that wanker?
kron
Regular
I asked early on in the meeting but got shut down. Not related to the Annual report apparently... Later they mentioned that Ben had spent ~246 days overseas and a lot of that time in DRC in relation to a question on their renumeration. But that's the closest of anything we heard.I guess nothing was asked about the situation on the ground with our tenement then?
Like whether or not Zijin/cominiere coacroaches are crawling all over the camp and the core samples...
Last edited:
kron
Regular
Im no fan of Hoots, he fell of the rails hard but I disagree. If you can't ask questions in a room full of shareholders once a year, when would be an appropriate time?
Glad you noticed.
Similar threads
