BRICK
Where’s Zeebot 😶🌫️
Lynching?lynch?
Great idea….
Lynching?lynch?
Just interested in what's happening going forward with the MOU now that the MMGA goons are sidelined after their absolute fucking arsekicking at the AGMSorry W.N I’m a bit confused by your disclaimer… this forum is available to anyone whether you have a stock exchange account or not, you can read all the threads - therefore an open forum. I’ve probably misunderstood and completely agree with keeping any information which may jeopardise us away from here, but was confused by your wording?
He's advising the secret squirrel crew to discuss things off forum on their Wechat group. Or some other safe space for sensitive souls. Apparently this place is infested with spies.Sorry W.N I’m a bit confused by your disclaimer… this forum is available to anyone whether you have a stock exchange account or not, you can read all the threads - therefore an open forum. I’ve probably misunderstood and completely agree with keeping any information which may jeopardise us away from here, but was confused by your wording?
The US were fine with the election shenanigans last time around, I'd say their response will be predicated on their view of FT's position vis-a-vis China versus the West.Not a great sign Felix waving off the EU counterparts who were there for electoral legitimacy.
Biden and the US won't play too nicely if there's been signs of electoral fraud (which there certaintly will be).
Felix has shown his true colours in the past 6 months imo
He's advising the secret squirrel crew to discuss things off forum on their Wechat group. Or some other safe space for sensitive souls. Apparently this place is infested with spies.![]()
Before the US points the finger at other countries’ electoral legitimacy it should look at its own backyard.Not a great sign Felix waving off the EU counterparts who were there for electoral legitimacy.
Biden and the US won't play too nicely if there's been signs of electoral fraud (which there certaintly will be).
Felix has shown his true colours in the past 6 months imo
Maybe AUD$150,000/day is not enough incentive for Felix.Nigel better get his ass back to the DRC and see if Felix wants to sign this MoU as part of his campaign platform - a bullshit excuse tabled for the delay a few months ago.
In itself it's also not going to stop Zijin from proceeding to solidify their ground position in the northern tenement area. It's a hefty sum viewed in isolation, but if they drilled out and continue construction for another say 6 months and faced the resulting fine of 18m euro (plus the ticking payment from May til now) that's ultimately chickenfeed against the prospective value in winning that tenement - which will be in the tens of billions of euros at a minimum. I believe that a unethical behemoth like Zijin would view this as a necessary price to spend in risk v reward terms, to allow it to better argue that it should be at least allocated a permanent licence over this tenement, if not the lot, and build its standing to that end should it come to negotiations.Maybe AUD$150,000/day is not enough incentive for Felix.
If that's the case would Zijin/Xi Jinping have the DRC let AVZ take this all the way through ICSID re the entire project including Roche Dure?In itself it's also not going to stop Zijin from proceeding to solidify their ground position in the northern tenement area. It's a hefty sum viewed in isolation, but if they drilled out and continue construction for another say 6 months and faced the resulting fine of 18m euro (plus the ticking payment from May til now) that's ultimately chickenfeed against the prospective value in winning that tenement - which will be in the tens of billions of euros at a minimum. I believe that a unethical behemoth like Zijin would view this as a necessary price to spend in risk v reward terms, to allow it to better argue that it should be at least allocated a permanent licence over this tenement, if not the lot, and build its standing to that end should it come to negotiations.
However there is another question entirely of whether this approach will significantly impact their chances at the ICC, and whether their actions will also impact the DRCs position at ICSID should these emergency injunctions also be implemented as expected. I would suggest the answer is yes, it would have a serious impact, but how that feeds into Zijin's risk/reward calculations is an open question. I suspect they will push on regardless, unless ordered to stop after the injunctive decision by the highest levels of government with associated promises. I don't see much likelihood of this, in the near term at least, so whilst they can I expect we'll see frenzied Zijin action in this zone and at Mpiana-Mwanga to build on the 'ground reality' they are clearly aiming to present as a fait accompli.
Let's hope we hear something of the MoU soon!
To be honest, regardless of the 24 hour/day security, Zijin will try asap to build a huge road block on the way to the drill cores library.In itself it's also not going to stop Zijin from proceeding to solidify their ground position in the northern tenement area. It's a hefty sum viewed in isolation, but if they drilled out and continue construction for another say 6 months and faced the resulting fine of 18m euro (plus the ticking payment from May til now) that's ultimately chickenfeed against the prospective value in winning that tenement - which will be in the tens of billions of euros at a minimum. I believe that a unethical behemoth like Zijin would view this as a necessary price to spend in risk v reward terms, to allow it to better argue that it should be at least allocated a permanent licence over this tenement, if not the lot, and build its standing to that end should it come to negotiations.
However there is another question entirely of whether this approach will significantly impact their chances at the ICC, and whether their actions will also impact the DRCs position at ICSID should these emergency injunctions also be implemented as expected. I would suggest the answer is yes, it would have a serious impact, but how that feeds into Zijin's risk/reward calculations is an open question. I suspect they will push on regardless, unless ordered to stop after the injunctive decision by the highest levels of government with associated promises. I don't see much likelihood of this, in the near term at least, so whilst they can I expect we'll see frenzied Zijin action in this zone and at Mpiana-Mwanga to build on the 'ground reality' they are clearly aiming to present as a fait accompli.
Let's hope we hear something of the MoU soon!
"How enforecable is the MOU if it's a non-binding agreement?"I am highly interested in the current state of the "said" MOU between AVZ and presumably the DRC Government
What is the content?
Who are the participants?
What are the objectives?
Who is accountable?
What conditions are involved?
How enforecable is the MOU if it's a non-binding agreement?
If anyone can add to the discussion I'd really appreciate the contribution because after getting the fucktard, anti-Australian, money grubbing, Tommy loving, MMGA, Chinese backed corrupted arseholes out of the way for the time being this for me is the next most critical piece of the puzzle
Disclaimer: And I mean this 100% .... don't share a fucking word of anything here on the open forum if it might prejudice the plans of the current BOD or assist the self serving c#nts trying to steal Manono from genuine shareholders/stakeholders and the good people of the DRC.....you know who those pricks are
They haven't cared about the rules/laws so far."How enforecable is the MOU if it's a non-binding agreement?"
"The proposed signing of a BINDING MoU would provide for a stay of the ICSID proceedings while the DRC Government takes the necessary steps to comply with the DRC Mining Code at which time the ICSID proceedings could be withdraw" AVZ 15/11/23
It's binding baby . Like bondage but not as fun .
Well that's depressed me for the evening.In itself it's also not going to stop Zijin from proceeding to solidify their ground position in the northern tenement area. It's a hefty sum viewed in isolation, but if they drilled out and continue construction for another say 6 months and faced the resulting fine of 18m euro (plus the ticking payment from May til now) that's ultimately chickenfeed against the prospective value in winning that tenement - which will be in the tens of billions of euros at a minimum. I believe that a unethical behemoth like Zijin would view this as a necessary price to spend in risk v reward terms, to allow it to better argue that it should be at least allocated a permanent licence over this tenement, if not the lot, and build its standing to that end should it come to negotiations.
However there is another question entirely of whether this approach will significantly impact their chances at the ICC, and whether their actions will also impact the DRCs position at ICSID should these emergency injunctions also be implemented as expected. I would suggest the answer is yes, it would have a serious impact, but how that feeds into Zijin's risk/reward calculations is an open question. I suspect they will push on regardless, unless ordered to stop after the injunctive decision by the highest levels of government with associated promises. I don't see much likelihood of this, in the near term at least, so whilst they can I expect we'll see frenzied Zijin action in this zone and at Mpiana-Mwanga to build on the 'ground reality' they are clearly aiming to present as a fait accompli.
Let's hope we hear something of the MoU soon!