A quick update for those looking to add their SMSF holding to Automic for voting.For those with BT SMSF- I submitted the required form today, was told it could be a few weeks to process. I explained the urgency, and then received notification the HIN number had been issued a few hours later. I believe that’s all that’s needed to be able to get things moving with automic.
And we all gotta keep the pressure on them on X.Great to see CominiereSA and their cronies freaking out overnight - I bet they didn't expect their corruption to be this public.
If they had PR13359 in the bag they wouldn't waste time on twitter threatening kiki's life and doxing people.
Just need to get through the AGM now, am I right in thinking Bellemel (zijin proxy) sold a large chunk before the halt to collapse the stock price? Hopefully kills their voting power
Hey CC, I posted back in May about Bellemal (see below)... add this tactic to the other corrupt dealings and it seems like a game of cat and mouse, but who's the cat?! We now have embassies, GOs & NGOs, western sideline investors etc, all on our side... Of all of our detractors, MMGA are the most despicable IMO!Great to see CominiereSA and their cronies freaking out overnight - I bet they didn't expect their corruption to be this public.
If they had PR13359 in the bag they wouldn't waste time on twitter threatening kiki's life and doxing people.
Just need to get through the AGM now, am I right in thinking Bellemel (zijin proxy) sold a large chunk before the halt to collapse the stock price? Hopefully kills their voting power
My understanding of the case is that we filed against DRC for unlawful termination of 13359. So recent events like splitting and selling 15775 on the premise of termination violate the ongoing legal case, and hence the emergency request.What is the ruling likely to be?
Appreciate you filling us in mate. Cheers.My understanding of the case is that we filed against DRC for unlawful termination of 13359. So recent events like splitting and selling 15775 on the premise of termination violate the ongoing legal case, and hence the emergency request.
Seems pretty simple, not sure how good the DRC's team is and whether they are also using the delay tactics employed by Zijin. DRC also cited 'urgency' in the matter in their termination, so it makes it hard to request delays. Or at least that's how i'd argue the fucking thing.
Hoping for a favourable ruling - not sure what we asked for at ICSID, i'd say a cease order against DRC similar to the one we already got against Cominiere.
Writing this now, it feels like ICSID could be a domino. Z from memory opposed increasing emergency injunction against Cominiere because ‘the progress made and termination have all been orchestrated by the State not Cominiere, so the penalty against Cominiere is not valid given they are not the ones performing the actions, merely the recipient of favourable actions of the Government.' - obviously not verbatim, but that's the logic behind Fasken's argument in Paris.
My understanding of the case is that we filed against DRC for unlawful termination of 13359. So recent events like splitting and selling 15775 on the premise of termination violate the ongoing legal case, and hence the emergency request.
Seems pretty simple, not sure how good the DRC's team is