If the MMGA goons (Massive Money Grubbing Arseholes) have enough votes to vote themselves up then by corollary they have enough votes to vote everyone else down
Why Deboss keeps muddying the waters rather than listen to management on how to vote is beyond me
The outcome we want is NO MMGA goons at all and our FIVE board endorsed nominees to get a seat at the table (2 re-elected + the 3 recently appointed and having to nominate)
It's simple and management have clearly advised how they want you to vote
OK this logic is a little flawed and relies on some assumptions that need to be clarified.
Just like those
against MMGA do not represent a homogeneous block, my assumption is the same on the other side.
They may have a large group of holder that they're working in concert with, and who will all vote in coordination. But we've seen how hard they're fighting to contact other holders to sway them to their position. 2 things from this:
1. They probably don't have the votes themselves to force through the resolutions they want
2. Anyone that they may manage to convince to vote in favour of an MMGA director via solicitation and marketing (/fearmongering) is not part of their coordinated block, and so we cannot make assumptions on their other votes.
All that to say, there are not simply 2 voting blocks in this election that are entirely congruous within themselves and entirely mutually exclusive.
MMGA especially will be relying on the 'swing-voters' (for lack of a better term) who may not entirely agree with them but are just a bit fed up after 2 years of being left in the dark while our investment goes through a shitshow. The 1 thing you have to give MMGA credit for is it has forced the BoD to give us more information about what is happening.