AVZ Discussion 2022

[wombat74]

I wonder how our new receptionist is going ? Not "smiling through the telephone " anymore is my guess .

 

[wombat74]

Because the problem may just be we don’t own 51-66%. Some are pushing the argument that we will only end up with 36%. Now that would be a problem!
Would love just this point to be clarified by AVZ/DRC. Would sure make me sleep better. That extra 15% is icing on the cake but without majority share we dead in the water ( pardon the pun with the talk about boatman today )

If the Chinese are claiming we will only hold 36% what happened to the money we paid to get up to the current 75% ? Also if any of this BS is true then surely the CATH deal is dead in the water ?

 

[cruiser51]

Mind if I borrow that to post on the crapper? Won't show your username or anything, if anything it will probably get me banned

Go for it, I never shorted, I believe shorting should be banned to be honest.

There are call and put options if you wish to gamble and magnify your exposure on shares going up or down.

But deadset against allowing brokers and or large institutions to use shares on their books to manipulate a share price.

Was just interested what it would cost to short, there are probably people on here, who could give a better explanation.

 

[Doc]

If the Chinese are claiming we will only hold 36% what happened to the money we paid to get up to the current 75% ? Also if any of this BS is true then surely the CATH deal is dead in the water ?

Have you heard the price of snacks in DRC at the moment?

 

[DiscoDanNZ]

Go for it, I never shorted, I believe shorting should be banned to be honest.

There are call and put options if you wish to gamble and magnify your exposure on shares going up or down.

But deadset against allowing brokers and or large institutions to use shares on their books to manipulate a share price.

Was just interested what it would cost to short, there are probably people on here, who could give a better explanation.

Note the tasteful cropping at the top, just enough to be readable without looking intentional...

 

[Thaz]

View attachment 7132

Note the tasteful cropping at the top, just enough to be readable without looking intentional...

Haha nice. It was a quick back of the envelope calc just to illustrate a point, which seems to have been lost for certain Crapper members.

 

[DiscoDanNZ]

Haha nice. It was a quick back of the envelope calc just to illustrate a point, which seems to have been lost for certain Crapper members.

I'm not surprised at all by that.

Shitstick in particular has been on my nerves since he first showed up. Mods must be having lunch, I can't believe its still up tbh

 

[TDITD]

If the Chinese are claiming we will only hold 36% what happened to the money we paid to get up to the current 75% ? Also if any of this BS is true then surely the CATH deal is dead in the water ?

That's the kicker, this has been a game of chess all along, we know yibin, huyaou all playing games trying to starve us when the price of lithium was in the dumps so we struggled for $$. Im sure Nigel an the board have a plan for the highly unlikely outcome of Zijin.
I bet it goes along the lines of 9% for catl with a renegotiated amount of capital they give us (still enough for us to go mining) and both CATL & Zijin then cough up for their portion of costs, we hold 51% and they start again with their plans an BS.

 

[Sammy_da_Smile]

OMG AFR QUOTING BOATMANS REPORT

 

[Mining8]

OMG AFR QUOTING BOATMANS REPORT

View attachment 7145

 

[DiscoDanNZ]

OMG AFR QUOTING BOATMANS REPORT

View attachment 7145

Must have been bought out by the Chinese...

 

[Mining8]

Boatman is just dirt and lies and AFR just the other week reporting 36% and had to retract because of the L.E.G.A.L. F.A.C.T.S. when corrected by AVZ. This is truly gutter journalism by the AFR smearing AVZ from a disreputable group(Boatman) when already knowing the F.A.C.T.S!

Here are the F.A.C.T.S.!:

 

[Mining8]

OMG AFR QUOTING BOATMANS REPORT

View attachment 7145

 

[Remark]

AFR looking for a legal troubles by the look of this lazy "Journalism"

 

[wombat74]

That's the kicker, this has been a game of chess all along, we know yibin, huyaou all playing games trying to starve us when the price of lithium was in the dumps so we struggled for $$. Im sure Nigel an the board have a plan for the highly unlikely outcome of Zijin.
I bet it goes along the lines of 9% for catl with a renegotiated amount of capital they give us (still enough for us to go mining) and both CATL & Zijin then cough up for their portion of costs, we hold 51% and they start again with their plans an BS.

And with CATH's waiver re ML and then announce another extension . Obviously crap going on behind the scenes .

 

[wombat74]

Boatman is just dirt and lies and AFR just the other week reporting 36% and had to retract because of the L.E.G.A.L. F.A.C.T.S. when corrected by AVZ. This is truly gutter journalism by the AFR smearing AVZ from a disreputable group(Boatman) when already knowing the F.A.C.T.S!

Here are the F.A.C.T.S.!:

View attachment 7149

Hey Mining8 have you been on the Bat Phone to Nigel recently ?

 

[wombat74]

"As previously disclosed to ASX on 4 May 2021, any purported transfer of the 15% interest to Jin Cheng would be a material breach of the pre- emptive rights contained in the existing Dathcom Shareholders Agreement, invalid and of no force or effect." AVZ 11/05 / 22

Does anyone recall this announcement (4 May 2021) or conversation referring to ?

 

[DiscoDanNZ]

"As previously disclosed to ASX on 4 May 2021, any purported transfer of the 15% interest to Jin Cheng would be a material breach of the pre- emptive rights contained in the existing Dathcom Shareholders Agreement, invalid and of no force or effect." AVZ 11/05 / 22

Does anyone recall this announcement (4 May 2021) or conversation referring to ?

Yeah not exactly going to say otherwise today are they?

Like I've said my guess is they just aren't going to be commenting on ongoing legal issues at this stage and also don't need to trade in the short term... Might not suit everyone but it is what it is.

 

[Samus]

"As previously disclosed to ASX on 4 May 2021, any purported transfer of the 15% interest to Jin Cheng would be a material breach of the pre- emptive rights contained in the existing Dathcom Shareholders Agreement, invalid and of no force or effect." AVZ 11/05 / 22

Does anyone recall this announcement (4 May 2021) or conversation referring to ?

2021 is a typo

 

[wombat74]

2021 is a typo

Thanks mate .