BRICK
Regular
all good. i got modded for mine but probably a good thingSorry guys I lost the plot......
I have deleted a bunch of my frustrated venting posts
Apologies if I offended anyone
all good. i got modded for mine but probably a good thingSorry guys I lost the plot......
I have deleted a bunch of my frustrated venting posts
Apologies if I offended anyone
I agree with this 100% and is exactly my thought process. It finally gives us a valid reason now to move forward and accept a TO. Not a good look from both sides when we say we are serious miners and flip it for $10B. This news has certainly rattled the trolls as they are coming out in full force.The two outcomes for AVZ IMO are TO without mining licence or TO with mining licence.
Rumour has it there is currently an offer on the table as the project stands, without the mining licence circa $1.50.
If we can force the Governments hand into issuing us a ML, then that price in my opinion increases to around $3.50.
Even if we don't get the ML, the price has just gone up. The DRC can influence the buyer to pay the $2.50 so the arbitration case can be dropped.
Make no mistake about it, the board are doing everything they can to maximise shareholder value and they have my full support.
In a perfect world DRC would have issued the mining licence as we all thought they would have. But most of us underestimated the corruption and the squeeze the Chinese have over the DRC. There were a few posters who rightfully recognised this risk.
The non issuance on the mining licence was and is a result of the Chinese exerting pressure through nefarious means. The Chinese have long held the belief that if we don't get the mining licence then they can just take our project for little or nothing. They've had plenty of opportunities to pay fair price for the project but that's just not how they do business. Unfortunately for them this arrogance has not served them well.
The Chinese have underestimated Nigel and our BOD and they have also underestimated the DRC.
As much as shareholders feel animosity towards DRC Government officials I believe they want to do the right thing and break away from Chinese influence, but as we know it's not easy and the Chinese will not give up without a fight. They have deep pockets and will use any means necessary to maintain influence. They are an unrivaled force in the DRC and breaking away from their stranglehold will take time, but there have been encouraging signs.
This ICSID arbitration process allows the DRC Government an opportunity to rule against Chinese wishes with limited backlash as this forum carries the weight required to go against the Chinese. I'm sure It's the decision they would have liked to have made in the first instance, a decision that would have been hard to make with the Chinese standing over you holding a gun to your head.
All my opinion (apart from the rumours)
You out when this trades again?Whichever way you look at it this is a fucking mess, if we can get to the point where someone makes a reasonable takeover offer then good. Who wants to go mining in this shit box country at this point anyway?
No thanks.
If it trades again I imagine I'll be forced to hold and see if it gets back to anything like reasonable value. I'd rather lose the lot than sell for a pittance after this ordeal.You out when this trades again?
Hi Charbella3 days for AVZ? Nah, never going to happen. I am wondering why in this instance we have gone with ICSID Arbitration instead of ICC Arbitration. Your thoughts?
Sorry guys I lost the plot......
I have deleted a bunch of my frustrated venting posts
Apologies if I offended anyone
C’mon fellas hang in there ..Nut ,you lost da plot a long while back but no one had the heart to tell ya…come on Sam 100 weeks in suspension is just around the corner …we can do itWhichever way you look at it this is a fucking mess, if we can get to the point where someone makes a reasonable takeover offer then good. Who wants to go mining in this shit box country at this point anyway?
No thanks.
Thanks for this post @muksAVZ are not going to mine, this in my opinion is thier last ditch effort to secure a mining licence though negotiated means prior to TO.
The two outcomes for AVZ IMO are TO without mining licence or TO with mining licence.
Rumour has it there is currently an offer on the table as the project stands, without the mining licence circa $1.50.
If we can force the Governments hand into issuing us a ML, then that price in my opinion increases to around $3.50.
Even if we don't get the ML, the price has just gone up. The DRC can influence the buyer to pay the $2.50 so the arbitration case can be dropped.
Make no mistake about it, the board are doing everything they can to maximise shareholder value and they have my full support.
In a perfect world DRC would have issued the mining licence as we all thought they would have. But most of us underestimated the corruption and the squeeze the Chinese have over the DRC. There were a few posters who rightfully recognised this risk.
The non issuance on the mining licence was and is a result of the Chinese exerting pressure through nefarious means. The Chinese have long held the belief that if we don't get the mining licence then they can just take our project for little or nothing. They've had plenty of opportunities to pay fair price for the project but that's just not how they do business. Unfortunately for them this arrogance has not served them well.
The Chinese have underestimated Nigel and our BOD and they have also underestimated the DRC.
As much as shareholders feel animosity towards DRC Government officials I believe they want to do the right thing and break away from Chinese influence, but as we know it's not easy and the Chinese will not give up without a fight. They have deep pockets and will use any means necessary to maintain influence. They are an unrivaled force in the DRC and breaking away from their stranglehold will take time, but there have been encouraging signs.
This ICSID arbitration process allows the DRC Government an opportunity to rule against Chinese wishes with limited backlash as this forum carries the weight required to go against the Chinese. I'm sure It's the decision they would have liked to have made in the first instance, a decision that would have been hard to make with the Chinese standing over you holding a gun to your head.
All my opinion (apart from the rumours)
We'll likely get there regardless if we like it or not JohnnyC’mon fellas hang in there ..Nut ,you lost da plot a long while back but no one had the heart to tell ya…come on Sam 100 weeks in suspension is just around the corner …we can do it
View attachment 38114
As with most AVZ Announcements, you need to read a few times….let the emotions settle…..think a little bit deeper…..interpret how it fits into the overall situation. Best done while enjoying an alcoholic beverage or three imo.
I’m with a few others on this one. Probably lodged a few months ago in response to the MoM rescinding the decree and following input from the advisor, DLA and embassies of USA and Aus. It’s an administrative filing that has been accepted and imo intended to put the President and Ministers on Notice that the process has been commenced to get this sorted.
Noise of ZJN withdrawal and Cominiere swapped out and then the submission of ZJN to ICC, which includes Cominiere, could be results of this process being commenced and DRC taking action to rectify.
Good that AVZ commenced this action, likely back in March or April, and has started the clock for President to walk the talk or face the consequences of international community plus damages payout in excess of US $10bil….possibly double that imo.
Imo I think the noise of the last few weeks is a result of this action going on in the background and the DRC working to resolve.