Ok so big question now is if that's true then why the FK isn't Nigel there too. He bloody better be IMO
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Winking, not wanking, a lot can be a sign of stress.
If I wink a lot it is not a sign of impending news, but simply pollen.
Remark
Top 20
The Company notes that the Interim Financial Report 31 December 2022 released to the market on 16 March 2023 contained a typographical error on page 7, which states: “The Company is confident of a positive outcome in relation to the award of the Mining Licence pending resolution of the ICC arbitrations”
The statement should have read: “The Company is confident of a positive outcome in relation to the award of the Mining Licence and pending resolution of the ICC arbitrations”
Someone here picked up that error - I can't remember who?
The statement should have read: “The Company is confident of a positive outcome in relation to the award of the Mining Licence and pending resolution of the ICC arbitrations”
Someone here picked up that error - I can't remember who?
BRICK
Regular
Maybe Felix took.... Andrew Forrest
Im sure a lot of wanking can lead to excessive winking?
Last edited:
John25
Regular
Found another error …
“For further information contact Ben”
He must be back in Perth & has internet coverage
but didnt state that he will reply though 
I was an abysmal failure in biology, but by all means I will not stop you from reporting on your experiences.Maybe Felix took
Im sure a lot of wanking can lead to excessive winking?
Misfits
Regular
He is still in the DRC
Azzler
Top 20
Holy crap I was actually right about a speculation for once!
Isn't that nice
Oh and thank god that wasn't true.
Also to Hoots on the crapper, WRONG BIATCH!
T
The thought of him AND Felix actually meeting IN MANONO - if it's true - does give me some optimism
That's great!
The thought of him AND Felix actually meeting IN MANONO - if it's true - does give me some optimism
Pleased to see it was just a typo, though that's typically sloppy of our comms people. That should have been caught. Anyway, that's one bit of easement.
Two points of interest I've picked out of this announcement. The first is how Zijin/JC's case and effort to win their way into the project is described - which basically puts to bed for me that the company have any intention for now of entering into a settlement with Zijin.
The second is a point of confusion regarding the bifurcated Zijin ICC arbitration
Here it states that if the first challenge wins out, then Jin Cheng don't have the right to institute arbitration at the ICC against us due to non involvement in the JVA. It however says that this wouldn't determine whether the sale by Cominiere was effective which must be determined in another separate proceeding. Wouldn't success in the first challenge remove the ability for a second ICC hearing to be held on whether the sale of shares was actually legit?
Does this mean a different kind of proceedings would be required? Where would they happen, DRC courts? That's not ideal for us, we can't win in that corrupt environment. With the dathomir case we ignored DRC court rulings as lacking jurisdiction but if its determined that JC aren't in the JVA, where would jurisdiction be? Would this require us starting a separate ICC case against Cominiere to determine the legitimacy of the transfer, given they ARE in the JVA?
Colour me confused. Anyone got any thoughts? I'm probably over complicating this in my head but to me it doesn't add up as explained in this announcement.
Two points of interest I've picked out of this announcement. The first is how Zijin/JC's case and effort to win their way into the project is described - which basically puts to bed for me that the company have any intention for now of entering into a settlement with Zijin.
The second is a point of confusion regarding the bifurcated Zijin ICC arbitration
Here it states that if the first challenge wins out, then Jin Cheng don't have the right to institute arbitration at the ICC against us due to non involvement in the JVA. It however says that this wouldn't determine whether the sale by Cominiere was effective which must be determined in another separate proceeding. Wouldn't success in the first challenge remove the ability for a second ICC hearing to be held on whether the sale of shares was actually legit?
Does this mean a different kind of proceedings would be required? Where would they happen, DRC courts? That's not ideal for us, we can't win in that corrupt environment. With the dathomir case we ignored DRC court rulings as lacking jurisdiction but if its determined that JC aren't in the JVA, where would jurisdiction be? Would this require us starting a separate ICC case against Cominiere to determine the legitimacy of the transfer, given they ARE in the JVA?
Colour me confused. Anyone got any thoughts? I'm probably over complicating this in my head but to me it doesn't add up as explained in this announcement.
Is it the commissionaire who is precu the 7M $?
Yes $5 million of the 33 million.
A relative of adviser Jean-Claude Bukasa at the heart of the controversial sale of Cominière assets
Recently pinned down by the General Inspectorate of Finance, the sale to a Chinese company of shares held by the public mining company Cominière was made possible thanks to the company Focus Plaidoirie belonging to Lisette Kabanga Tshibwabwa, a member of Félix Tshisekedi's cabinet.
Anybody, who thought life as a president is easy, better think twice.
Could it be:
Step 1, sort out Zijin.
Followed by step 2, sort out Cominière, as they illegally sold 15% and AVZ has a financial losses claim against Cominière.
How Cominière wishes to solve that problem is up to CKK, he is a star in reading contracts and working with calculators.
Fuk Hoots, fukkin wanker really showed his colours.Holy crap I was actually right about a speculation for once!
Isn't that nice
Oh and thank god that wasn't true.
Also to Hoots on the crapper, WRONG BIATCH!
I have stress every day
And I thought you were simply a winker.
and a thinker or was that drinker
Similar threads
