If FIRB stopped the YIBIN deal because they had an interest in Australia's requirement for critical minerals, would they be interested in the Chinese using corruption to try and steal Manono?Somehow you have to bring race or gender into it
If FIRB stopped the YIBIN deal because they had an interest in Australia's requirement for critical minerals, would they be interested in the Chinese using corruption to try and steal Manono?Somehow you have to bring race or gender into it
Different Government in now, although the thematic surrounding strategic minerals hasn't changed. I doubt we could do much, but I dare say they may tap their bigger stronger older brother on the shoulder an tell him that Zijin are not playing fair (USA btw)If FIRB stopped the YIBIN deal because they had an interest in Australia's requirement for critical minerals, would they be interested in the Chinese using corruption to try and steal Manono?
Sent this to the AFR:
Good morning,
I would like to make a formal complaint about Tom Richardson and his recent articles regarding AVZ Minerals. The 'stories' are extremely one sided, overly suggestive and have a number of factual errors or omissions.
I note that the recent ruling against the AFR for very similar type of reporting where Justice Anna Katzmann found that the articles were "spiced with an account of suspicious circumstances" against a politician. And that, "The ordinary reasonable reader is prone to loose thinking and reads between the lines. And that is precisely what the respondents encouraged them to do. This article was
I will be doing that today. Enough is enough!Should we all send this to the AFR?
Need to include MoneyBags points in a previous post regarding the work AVZ have done to reach this point, it is gold. If some of the more gramatically gifted(retired) posters could create a generic letter that we could distribute widely I am sure it would be embraced by many. Possible recipients:Should we all send this to the AFR?
I’ll bring a loaf of bread. Sorry it’s all I can afford with money tied up in this for so long….Sausage sizzle is on …![]()
I spent a little bit of time to put one together:Need to include MoneyBags points in a previous post regarding the work AVZ have done to reach this point, it is gold. If some of the more gramatically gifted(retired) posters could create a generic letter that we could distribute widely I am sure it would be embraced by many. Possible recipients:
ACMA
Media Watch
60 Minutes
DFAT
Press Council
DRC Presidents office
F#uck the AFR!
MoM
MoP
Applicable US government agencies.
Cheers Dazz
[REDACTED]
I’ll privately share with you what I sent to the U.S state department. Not posting it here: not all eyes here are friendly.Now, how to I get the Australian Government interested in this debacle?
How many shareholders is there?Classic... i wonder who will get accidentally shot by him on set?
NNOOO! wait dont answer that ANYONE! you dont want to incriminate yourselves!
Thats why we are having no frills Vegan sausagesI’ll bring a loaf of bread. Sorry it’s all I can afford with money tied up in this for so long….
I'll have mine with extra gluten please JohnThats why we are having no frills Vegan sausages![]()
No need to show offI’ll bring a loaf of bread. Sorry it’s all I can afford with money tied up in this for so long….
No fucking way!! I bet the dogs eat better than that .. .. ..Thats why we are having no frills Vegan sausages![]()
Nigel allegedly said at one of the roadshows that if the DRC government took the tenement off us then we would seek 10b in damages at the ICCIf we get shafted will the legal action we take put further delays on the project ? Would give us some leverage if it does .
My perception is that the longer this problem lasts the weaker AVZ's position becomes. I feel that the DRC Govt. is now getting up steam to be reelected, and they need to shore up support even with corrupt officials. When you add the Chinese influence on the economy these factors diminish the importance of AVZ and Manono. Irrespective of AVZ's legal position ( which may be relatively strong ) the only solution i see is that AVZ needs to do deals with Dathomir and Comminiere. The strategy needs to be 51% of something is better than 75% of nothing.
Dathomir may be the easiest, and if AVZ assign their rights to Cath and they buy out Dathomir's 15% this removes one obstacle. The terms that AVZ has with Cath may include some reimbursement to AVZ on work completed to date. Cath then have 15% plus AVZ sale for 9% gives them the 24% of the project ( AVZ back to 51% ).
By isolating Comminiere with its 20 or 25% ( ? MMCS ) AVZ can remake its offer for the 10 or 15%. AVZ have then shown that in spite of corruption, they have made an attempt to finalise the shareholder issue. This gives the DRC Govt an excuse to support AVZ by overriding Comminiere if they are being obstinate. If that doesn't work they may have to accept Zijin as a partner.
The thrust of this scenario is to get the ML asap and be prepared to compromise. Without the ML AVZ is worth peanuts.
AVZ also has a number of issues to also finalise. The hydro power plant, The dismissal of the outstanding fine and gaol warrant against its Director, the collaboration agreement and the SEZ.
Even if AVZ gets past this ML situation i still see pressure being applied for a takeover of Dathcom. My impression is that Chinese interests already have a strong holding in AVZ. To counteract this block AVZ needs to get more outside support from possible US or Europe corporations.
The next couple of months will be interesting and we can only hope that shareholders get some reward for their investment.
These opinions are my own and i have not relied on any information from any other person or company. Do your own research.
From what I can see ICC rulings mean fuck all and are not enforceableNigel allegedly said at one of the roadshows that if the DRC government took the tenement off us then we would seek 10b in damages at the ICC
My conclusion from that is if we get shafted then the project will go ahead without us
Ok cheers . I thought that would be the case . So it's basically now or never. Court case would take years with no guarantee SH will see any money . F--k that .Nigel allegedly said at one of the roadshows that if the DRC government took the tenement off us then we would seek 10b in damages at the ICC
My conclusion from that is if we get shafted then the project will go ahead without us
Time for legal action is over.If we get shafted will the legal action we take put further delays on the project ? Would give us some leverage if it does .