Interesting…
Just checked from my end, it's gone.
Interesting…
Agreed🫢🫢🫢Even when I search the Number 13698 there is nothing. The website have often bugs and on a other page I read something in the past that the trimble landfolio server have often problems too. But even when the site have bugs in the past and I can’t find a license I always found it when I searched for the license number. So this is really new. DG of cami didn’t see what he is doing because of to much tears in his eyes?
Ok, so someone at CAMI has the crayons out again. Or maybe it’s “bring your kid to work day“ and they let them loose on Trimble?The permit numbers for all existing tantalex related tenements have changed as well.
PR12247 to PE12447 granted
PR12248 to PR 12448
PR13348 is also gone.
Sorry for misinterpreting what you meantI have read it. And never said anything about in the letter was a offer. So please read my post carefully too!
At the end nigel clearly stated: Cominiere SA never consulted its partner AVZI but sent a letter to the parent company AVZ.
And my question is….what stands in the letter? Was it a invitation for the first speaking about a deal? Was it just the information that cominiere making a deal and sell it to zijin? Or was it just a bday gift card? nothing more.
And it’s a fact that the Minister of portfolio criticized in a letter that it’s confusing when to interact with avz or avzi. Nothing more again.
Like I said before I have no idea what was in the letter written by cominiere. And it’s only interesting when it was the first invite for a consultation of the jv partners to maybe discuss the zijin deal. And when cominiere get no response, it could be the trigger to continue discussions with zijin. But that’s just a theory, and it would only be interesting when it was a invitation before the zijin deal was done. I know they are dodgy as fuck but in the letter from nigel is no word about what stands in cominieres letter and which date got it.
like a prosecutor, i seek incriminating and exculpatory evidence for both sides. I don't think our management has done everything flawlessly in the past. whether it is just a lack of involvement in building a meaningful working relationship which could be a little part that brings us in that situation. So Please don't say things I've never said, like i did when you post anything. I’m very carefully in my words and when i have a feeling about someone’s thoughts but not sure if I interpreted it in the right way, I just ask again.
Fuck me....Ned Kelly's trying to rob us too!Just stopped by to check on our investment, everyone was cheerful and had big smiles on their faces. I asked Nige what our prospects are like and he just gave me a wink and said happy new year.
View attachment 25692
I hope everyone is having a good holidays and a happy new year in advance!
Fuck me....Ned Kelly's trying to rob us too!
EXACTLY !!! Please do ignore any 'confused' 'shareholders' 'unintentionally' 'muddying' the waters.I'm really not sure where you two got the idea that the offer letter was sent to AVZ instead of AVZI. Or why that would matter. I highly recommend that you both brush up on how corporate ownership structures work.
Just in case anyone is still confused let me spell it out again. Cominiere didn't tell Dathcom / AVZI / AVZ or anyone else that they were selling the 15% to Zijin. They also took bribes from Zijin to do this. That's why the CEO and technical director of Cominiere were arrested.
Here is AVZ's full letter from November 8th 2021. Please read carefully before jumping to any more wild conclusions:
View attachment 25665 View attachment 25666 View attachment 25667
Thanks for sharing Carlos. That additional detail makes the sequence of events clearer (a bit anyway ).Sorry for misinterpreting what you meant
The AVZ letter clearly states 'Cominiere SA never shared the offer that Zijin mining made, via its subsidiary Jin Cheng Mining, for the 15% shares in Dathcom Mining with AVZI/AVZ. AVZ has only been made aware of the offer via the scandalous court order that has now been quashed and subsequently has not been able to exercise it's legal pre-emptive rights.'
The part about the letter being sent to AVZ instead of AVZI is regarding a letter sent by Cominiere notifying AVZ that they were going to sell to Zijin. So I was wrong about that too haha. But if the offer was sent to AVZ instead of AVZI it would have been sufficient imo. I forgot about the tweet below from Franck Fwamba where he explains exactly what happened.
View attachment 25674
Cominiere did inform AVZ of their intention to sell to Zijin but did not include the price. AVZ responded with a letter that they wanted to enforce their pre-emption right and asked what Zijin's offer price to Cominiere was. They followed up 2 days later via email reminding Cominiere of AVZ's first right of refusal and asked again what the price offered by Zijin is. AVZ never received a reply to either of those requests.
View attachment 25675 View attachment 25676
Just stopped by to check on our investment, everyone was cheerful and had big smiles on their faces. I asked Nige what our prospects are like and he just gave me a wink and said happy new year.
View attachment 25692
I hope everyone is having a good holidays and a happy new year in advance!