BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
More obvious with our xilnix connection.....
BrainChip Introduces World's First Commercial Hardware Acceleration of Neuromorphic Computing
BrainChip Introduces World's First Commercial Hardware Acceleration of Neuromorphic Computing September 12, 2017
brainchip.com
Kachoo
Regular
I would believe that highlights the theory of the manipulation happening. Also it shows how the potential for SNN technology is more limitless then a resource stock that is bound by the property size.
It's extreamly hard to gauge the market size for SNN cause it in limits infancy and Instos have estimates and reports us retail will never see.imo
DingoBorat
Slim
We have connections everywhere.More obvious with our xilnix connection.....
BrainChip Introduces World's First Commercial Hardware Acceleration of Neuromorphic Computing
BrainChip Introduces World's First Commercial Hardware Acceleration of Neuromorphic Computing September 12, 2017
I don't think that adds any extra weight..
Yes we need to up-list in the US asap, agreed.
The institutions are not allowed to trade OTC stocks in the US so very little is going on there.
From Investopedia:
While many financial institutions are prohibited from trading penny stocks, loosely regulated hedge funds have no such restrictions. That said, most hedge funds won't trade penny stocks on the long side: They far prefer short-selling penny stocks that look to have peaked after being heavily promoted. Penny stocks, although they often do indeed trade for mere pennies, can still be exceedingly dangerous to short because of the risk of a short squeeze. So while the risk-reward payoff for shorting a penny stock is too skewed (i.e., offering a limited reward if the short strategy works and unlimited risk if it doesn't) to be worthwhile for an average investor, the strategy may entice a deep-pocketed hedge fund.
10 Types of Investors and Traders in Penny Stocks Explained
Discover the 10 types of investors trading penny stocks daily, from corporate insiders to speculators, and understand the high-risk landscape they navigate.
That's right. Edge AGI will not use the global model library of ChatGPT. It's LLM model libraries will be subject specific. But they will still be large. If you look at Zack Shelby's graph from the other day showing the adaptation of Nvidia's model libraries to different size processors, you can see the correlation between model size and performance for von Neumann processors, and how Akida's digital SNN breaks that model by greatly reducing the model size for superior performance.Thank you Dio for providing us with some context and an explanation from your understanding, in plain english.
Indeed, the processing step up from the recognition of a predetermined wake word to the complexity of NLP in one generation is astounding to me.
And beyond the building blocks of dictionaries and thesauri surely any system will require access and application rules of syntax and grammar in order to produce anything more than a parroting of language?
Is the mere application of rules enough to provide an adequate simulacrum of consciousness?
Although on reflection that is somewhat the situation now with Chat GPT isn't it.
It has been refined and trained enough though to furnish a usable tool.
So are you saying that some version of all this evaluation, processing and reconciliation (if provisioned with access to a sufficiently worthy model library held separately in memory) could be carried out in Akida 2000 hardware rather than the current software emulations?
I would imagine that initially it would be bound within the confines of specific use cases such as the teaching of/ or the translation of a specific language perhaps or some other definable subject such as biology.
Perhaps I am getting carried away with the immediate potentialities of the tech as is my wont.
I suffer from a somewhat retrofuturistic syndrome bought about by a far too liberal dose of the Jetsons, Lost in Space and Star Trek in my television irradiated youth.
Anyway, Thank You again for all your continuing valuable contributions here.
Well done.
As you say, the rules of syntax are part of the mix. This is also important in translation from one language to another. Those crazy French always have the cart in front of the horse.
Even if we are at the point where the systems can understand language, I don't think that we are at the point of creating consciousness, where the silicon can think for itself. I don't know how you would even define consciousness in the context of a computer. They are already "aware" of their environment. They can be progremmed to respond to their environment. Tesla claims to have trained an AV based on millions of hours of footage, without using object classification.
Now you've made me go down this rabbit hole:
Is consciousness the difference between learning and thinking?
Learning is a prerequisite for thinking.
Language is not a prerequisite for sensory learning.
Sensory learning does lead to a level of thinking in sentient beings, eg, burning one's hand on the hotplate, (one-shot learning?). You "learn" that that was a painful experience - most people would "think" that they will not do that again.
Language is a prerequisite for some forms of abstract thinking, but does imagination require language?
Are there different forms of consciousness?
https://www.britannica.com/story/why-a-computer-will-never-be-trulyconscious
Why a computer will never be truly conscious
...Even before Turing’s work, German quantum physicist Werner Heisenberg showed that there was a distinct difference in the nature of the physical event and an observer’s conscious knowledge of it. This was interpreted by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger to mean that consciousness cannot come from a physical process, like a computer’s, that reduces all operations to basic logic arguments.
These ideas are confirmed by medical research findings that there are no unique structures in the brain that exclusively handle consciousness. Rather, functional MRI imaging shows that different cognitive tasks happen in different areas of the brain. This has led neuroscientist Semir Zeki to conclude that “consciousness is not a unity, and that there are instead many consciousnesses that are distributed in time and space.” That type of limitless brain capacity isn’t the sort of challenge a finite computer can ever handle.
Written by Subhash Kak, Regents Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oklahoma State University.
The great thing about Heisenberg is his uncertainty principle which has been my lodestone.
DingoBorat
Slim
My understanding, is that the preparation has been done for a NASDAQ listing previously.
But we are so far off that presently..
We can and need to start making a real impact first.
We won't be listing on the NASDAQ, until we have solid recurring and increasing revenue and are profitable, by a good margin.
We need to be in the dollars, share price wise, but jumping there won't do it, unless the revenue is rolling in to support it, in my opinion.
The Company has already stated, that there is more to be gotten (screwed?) out of the ASX first..
Interesting like from Anil
Last edited:
Afternoon Boab ,
Cheers for that .
Don't suppose anyone here has the capability to zoom right in on the contract papers / MOU being signed.
Would be nice to see the terms & conditions.
Any one have access to a digital forensics lab.
Regards,
Esq.
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
Yikes!
This stuff has me bleeding at the eyes and ears these days I'm afraid.
I'm just gonna have to trust in Brainchip making me wealthy enough to be able to afford a gorgeous French Fembot who can explain it all to me whilst changing my diapers and laughing at my jokes.
Personally, I've never been too sure about that Heisenberg chap though.
I'm off for a walk. Thanks again for sharing your insight with us all.
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
"I think there will be more regret in the near future, not buying, or having the means to buy more at these prices."(DB)
I totally agree DB ...
As this latest pill that we are all digesting is an extremely bitter one ..I have tried to sweeten it a bit by taking full advantage of this huge buying opportunity and topping up with some big parcels (and again next week hopefully!?) For me I am averaging
which goes against my normal trading patterns, but I personally think it's the correct decision! (My opinion only!).Just one.............
POWER ANNOUNCEMENT! Have a great weekend Chippers ...... 35degs here in Perth today...Pool and a few bevs today me thinks....
Cheers
thelittleshort
Top Bloke
The following people who liked Nick Destrycker’s post also follow BrainChip directly
Three European Space Agency employees, specialising in on-board data and one from SEFAR, specialising in situational awareness for shipping vessels
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
Too true robsmark...
To enter the arena with the Big Dogs on the Nasdaq would be a disaster at the moment,(chewed up and spat out) until we have proven huge sales and large revenues streaming in we will stay well away!!!! In reality I think it might be 2025/2026 before that bridge is crossed!
Hoping for a better week ahead!
Cheers
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
rgupta
Regular
I believe in Buffet's famous quote "when everyone is fearful be greedy""I think there will be more regret in the near future, not buying, or having the means to buy more at these prices."(DB)
I totally agree DB ...
As this latest pill that we are all digesting is an extremely bitter one ..I have tried to sweeten it a bit by taking full advantage of this huge buying opportunity and topping up with some big parcels (and again next week hopefully!?) For me I am averaging
Just one.............
Have a great weekend Chippers ...... 35degs here in Perth today...Pool and a few bevs today me thinks....
Cheers
So if you believe in company then it may be a good time to become greedy.
Dyor
rgupta
Regular
I may be wrong when I start buying at $1 but I will not be wrong if I buy the same stock @15 cents.
If I am wrong at both the times that means I am not worth investing !!
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
"So if you believe in company" (rgupta)
I really do believe in BRN!! ......as I said in a previous post my blood type is BRN positive
Cheers
Hello All
I was hoping someone could shine a light on a query I have.
First of all, I’m not bothered about the SP falling, I know that there’s a lot of manipulation going on atm. I have been accumulating in small parcels as the price has dropped. To me it’s a golden opportunity.
However, on crapper, a lot of down ramping is going on and in reference to Brn having funding only for a few more quarters and then will require a CR. I know that revenue might come into play but it probably won’t be enough to cover overheads.
With the SP currently at 15 cents and quarterly results due soon, it is quite possible that revenue would not have increased by much unless contracts are signed. The fact that no announcements have been made probably indicates no new contracts.
A quarterly report indicating no increase revenue will impact on the SP further and possibly driving the SP down to single digits.
So my question is:
How financially stable are Brn atm?
If Brn do require a CR it would mean more diluting of shares?
I know that in the long run Brn will achieve its revenue goals but shorters will take full advantage and this could put Brn in a very vulnerable state.
Keen to hear your thoughts. These are genuine questions which I’m hoping someone can give me genuine answers.
I was hoping someone could shine a light on a query I have.
First of all, I’m not bothered about the SP falling, I know that there’s a lot of manipulation going on atm. I have been accumulating in small parcels as the price has dropped. To me it’s a golden opportunity.
However, on crapper, a lot of down ramping is going on and in reference to Brn having funding only for a few more quarters and then will require a CR. I know that revenue might come into play but it probably won’t be enough to cover overheads.
With the SP currently at 15 cents and quarterly results due soon, it is quite possible that revenue would not have increased by much unless contracts are signed. The fact that no announcements have been made probably indicates no new contracts.
A quarterly report indicating no increase revenue will impact on the SP further and possibly driving the SP down to single digits.
So my question is:
How financially stable are Brn atm?
If Brn do require a CR it would mean more diluting of shares?
I know that in the long run Brn will achieve its revenue goals but shorters will take full advantage and this could put Brn in a very vulnerable state.
Keen to hear your thoughts. These are genuine questions which I’m hoping someone can give me genuine answers.
Rskiff
Regular
Some here have blood transfusions and change to Oh negative"So if you believe in company" (rgupta)
I really do believe in BRN!! ......as I said in a previous post my blood type is BRN positive
Cheers
Similar threads
