MoneyBags1348
Top 20
Ok didn't realise we were down to $37mil and our burn rate was so high . Can we sack 70 % of the AVZ team ? Maybe use Nigel's garage as head office . I do remember now Nigel saying at the AGM if things were not going our way in 3 months he would look at cutting back on spending and then reviewing it quarterly after that . I'm sure everyone sees the irony in his statement if we go back to what he said at the first RS in perth .
In order to keep operating costs down, maybe Nigel could also flog off the Roller and drive an EV instead...you know one of those things that uses lithium, rather than fossil fuel. We have lots of lithium, so problem solved.
Cheers
F
Wombles and Flight I’m putting this consideration to our own TSE accountant…. The cunt…. Oops sorry, @TheCount
AVZ and CATH should sign the TIA and award CATH the 9% discussed for $90 mil.
This leaves us with 51% and majority ownership, gives us the cash to get us through the corruption and extra ownership issues, takes a whole lot of stress off the company and it’s shareholders in the meantime, allows us to keep up the early works and infrastructure spending and last and most important in my eyes…. gives us a Chinese partner who may be able to contribute to our situation in more ways than just taking our offtake.
CATH said they didn’t need the ML so if Nigel and Mr Pei are actually fair dinkum and not bullshiting everyone (including @Deboss) with their winking, then they would have this in the bag ready to pull out at the ‘blink’ (not fucken wink) of an eye
That’s just my suggestion, but for some reason I don’t believe or trust Nigel or Mr Pei or anyone else who grins while they are winking.
My last thought, a couple of black eyes would soon stop all that winking
What do you think Count


