C
ChrisU
Guest
ANYWAY....
Here is some more speculation from me that you top blokes and ladies might enjoy...
What if the Zijin/Comminarie, as well as the Dathomir/Cong issues, are really no issue at all, and never truly were.
Which is why it was indeed immaterial and why BOD didn't bother to inform the market.
We don't yet truly know what this massive extension is really about.
What if it is only about the tenement CDL cut-off thing?
I'm saying this because a lot of us are furious we werent alerted to these issues with ownership % earlier... but what if they're nothing to do with the hold up?
I'm just speculating, but I'd say we are mostly assuming it is to do with that. But it might not be.
I guess I'm just saying, let's wait and see.
It’s immaterial in one sense, legal rights, but that doesn’t mean non-disclosure by ASX standards. If you don’t think JV partners have obstructed progress for AVZ (material test), then you must be kidding