BRN Discussion Ongoing

Interesting isn't it....The ASX dishes out a please explain and the answers are generally always
No No No No.....thanks for coming, can we carry on now, undisturbed.

Today $1.20 down as low as $1.00 that's a 16.5% move to the downslide, where's the please explain now.

The whole thing is a sham in my opinion. :unsure::geek:😜
In about 2019 after all of the fraud and malpractice that the FCA had found and continued to find with the retirement of the then Head of the FCA the Government of the day appointed a new Head who declared the FCA had done a sterling job and the industry had changed its ways and prosecution was no longer to be seen as the goal but guidance and education was to be the way forward.

The whole financial system is geared to the interests of the large institutions.

The following is an interesting summary of some of the fines imposed which gives scale to the corrupt practices that weigh on retail investors ability to play in this area:

“The biggest corporate fines in history and how they changed business​

Governments and civil courts are increasingly willing to inflict hefty penalties for wrongdoing, says author José Hernandez.​

by José Hernandez
Published: 24 May 2019
Last Updated: 23 May 2019
The decade since the 2008 financial crisis has witnessed an explosive leap in the magnitude of fines and penalties handed down to global companies found to have engaged in improper conduct. The $1.6bn penalty inflicted on engineering giant Siemens that year by US and German authorities for alleged violations of anti-corruption laws is less than half of the charge taken at Odebrecht in 2016 ($3.5bn).
These amounts, while huge, pale in comparison to the largest multi-billion-dollar fines levied for other major corporate offenses, ranging from financial fraud to violations of international sanctions and environmental crimes.
The United States has led this charge in pursuing increasingly massive fines for corporate offenders. However, prosecutors and regulators in other jurisdictions – and especially in Europe – have recently begun to follow suit. It's worth pointing out that the fines and penalties themselves imposed on companies by governmental authorities to resolve criminal and civil matters are just one part of the story – many such settlements bring forth class-action lawsuits and derivative actions that can add billions to the total price tag for misconduct.
The massive scope of today’s fines – and even greater reputational fallout of the wrongdoing they quantify – means that companies cannot afford to view such payments as mere "costs of doing business". Rather, they need to take a hard look at their business practices and make significant investments in their resources, structures and policies for compliance to ensure that they are equipped to prevent, detect, and respond to improper conduct before it is too late.
The top corporate fines each tell a story about how pervasive cultures of cheating can snowball into a scandal of catastrophic proportions and astronomical cost.

THE TOP CORPORATE FINES TO DATE​

The biggest corporate fine to date was levied against BP in the wake of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the largest in history. BP settledwith the U.S. Department of Justice for $20.8bn in 2016; the total compensation ultimately paid out by the company reportedly exceeded $65bn.

BP’s experience came at a sensitive time, when global discussions on tackling climate change pushed big oil company investments further towards renewable energy and more sound safety practices.
Several of the largest fines have hit the financial services industry, a direct result of the scrutiny facing banks in the wake of the financial crisis. These include the second-place $16.65bn fine paid by Bank of America in 2014 for its role in the subprime loan crisis, the $13 billion paid by JP Morgan to resolve similar charges, and the $8.9bn paid by BNP Paribas for violations of U.S. sanctions against Sudan, Iran, and Cuba.
Major fines have also been levied on Citigroup, Royal Bank of Scotland, Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, Wells Fargo, and HSBC holdings for conduct ranging from money laundering to rate manipulation, retail practices, and tax evasion. As a result, financial services companies have been forced to make significant new investments in their compliance, controls and oversight – however, with new cases often in the news, it appears that more much effort remains to be done.
The third largest fine was paid by Volkswagen, which, in 2016, faced $14.7bn in civil and criminal penalties from the United States in the wake of its scandal over emissions cheating. In a world increasingly concerned with the response to climate change, the VW case shook the entire automotive industry to the core. The VW scandal effectively doomed diesel as a fuel for the future. Today, all major automotive companies are directing their investments (and future) towards electric cars, while striving to meet increasingly aggressive emissions targets.

BIG TECH IN THE CROSSHAIRS​

Regulators in the US and Europe alike appear to be taking aim at Silicon Valley and with growing concerns about cyber-security, data protection, and online privacy, the technology sector has emerged as the next target of multi-billion-dollar fines. Over the past three years, the EU has levied a series of fines against Google for alleged anti-competitive practices, totalling over €8bn. In 2019, it has been widely reported that another tech giant, Facebook, is expected to face fines of up to $5bn by the Federal Trade Commission for privacy violations.

THE TAKEAWAY​

The lesson from these giant fines and penalties is clear: the era of tolerance for corporate crime has ended and going back to business-as-usual is not an option. Public and media attention, programs that reward whistleblowers, and multi-jurisdictional information sharing by national enforcement agencies means that global companies are under more regulatory scrutiny than ever before.
To be sure, this is a good thing: the mammoth fines of the past decade have forced companies to rethink their business practices on safety, environment, labour, integrity, transparency, competition, and corporate responsibility. Expect many more in the future”

What happened today is what I am speaking about and cannot be second guessed on a regular basis by retail shareholders. Those with wealth have power over the markets.

@MADX earlier today posted a very nice post about me but I must correct one thing I have never spoken on the telephone to anyone at the company. I keep all my communications via email to create a record and to prevent any misunderstandings between myself and those I communicate with and it is the consistency of these communications over some years which has caused me to trust their integrity.

The only way to consistently win as a retail investor is to research, research, research and have a plan based on your personal situation and stick to it and never think you can pat the animals at the ASX Zoo and not loose your hand.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 23 users

equanimous

Norse clairvoyant shapeshifter goddess
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Slade

Top 20
From BrainChip's website, this is what I love most.

1652157961857.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 50 users

MDhere

Top 20
bugger got back home from work and my 99c buy order missed by "that much"
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Haha
Reactions: 7 users

FromBeyond

Member
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Dang Son

Regular
Hi Dang Son

I cannot speak for management as I am an independent retail investor.

Can you clarify what your question is please?

Regards
FF
Thanks FF,
When I read, have a plan, I get the implication that I should be doing something smarter than what I'm planning, which is to wait for it to reach 10 bags then pull out my capitols and hold the free carry for further growth and potential dividends.
I haven't managed to swing any BRN into Super but still working on that (with a financial adviser like a handbrake)
What else could be implied by , "Have a plan."?
Thanks in advance, DS
I think it was Lou that said it also without elaborating.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 3 users

Slade

Top 20
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 3 users
Thanks FF,
When I read, have a plan, I get the implication that I should be doing something smarter than what I'm planning, which is to wait for it to reach 10 bags then pull out my capitols and hold the free carry for further growth and potential dividends.
I haven't managed to swing any BRN into Super but still working on that (with a financial adviser like a handbrake)
What else could be implied by , "Have a plan."?
Thanks in advance, DS
I think it was Lou that said it also without elaborating.
Thanks @Dang Son for the explanation.

No I am not suggesting you personally should do anything more.

My statement have a plan is as simple as that. It seems clear to me that some retail investors do not have any sort of plan.

They have never taken the time to ask what will I do if ‘X’ happens. They have never taken the time to sit down with their partner and say this is what I think we should do if ‘X’ occurs and have an agreed position.

I feel confident that there are retail holders who now are saying to themselves “Why didn’t we sell enough when it hit $2.34 to pay off the mortgage or the credit cards or paint the house or replace the car.”

I am not saying there is one perfect plan that suits every investors circumstances. What I am saying is not having any sort of plan is a receipe for disappointment.

My plan is to hold my key shares until the total value of my portfolio is “X” then reassess my plan.

I believe that between now and 2025 unless Puto blows up the world I will reach that target value.

I accept that the values of my shares will swing around just like they did today but I cannot control that .

By doing my research and being part of the 1,000 Eyes I am completely confident that nothing can come out of left field to destroy the fundamentals of Brainchip.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 66 users

cosors

👀
Hey Bravo,

Intel are spending tens of billions building new and expanding existing foundries. They're trying to attract customers for the foundries. They've said they'll work with anyone on any level ie they can design, manufacture and program your chip or just manufacture.

Intel: Record investment of 17 billion euros planned in Germany

Settlement of the new chip factory is the largest foreign investment in the history of Germany

According to Intel, around 80 billion euros could flow into the location for a new chip factory in Magdeburg in the long term.
16.03.2022
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 24 users

Dang Son

Regular
Thanks @Dang Son for the explanation.

No I am not suggesting you personally should do anything more.

My statement have a plan is as simple as that. It seems clear to me that some retail investors do not have any sort of plan.

They have never taken the time to ask what will I do if ‘X’ happens. They have never taken the time to sit down with their partner and say this is what I think we should do if ‘X’ occurs and have an agreed position.

I feel confident that there are retail holders who now are saying to themselves “Why didn’t we sell enough when it hit $2.34 to pay off the mortgage or the credit cards or paint the house or replace the car.”

I am not saying there is one perfect plan that suits every investors circumstances. What I am saying is not having any sort of plan is a receipe for disappointment.

My plan is to hold my key shares until the total value of my portfolio is “X” then reassess my plan.

I believe that between now and 2025 unless Puto blows up the world I will reach that target value.

I accept that the values of my shares will swing around but I cannot control that just like they did today.

By doing my research and being part of the 1,000 Eyes I am completely confident that nothing can come out of left field to destroy the fundamentals of Brainchip.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
Thanks Mate.
I agree, every day our great researchers provide more reasons for greater confidence.
Just need a lot of patience with this manipulation atm.
Cheers
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 18 users

TheFunkMachine

seeds have the potential to become trees.
Thanks @Dang Son for the explanation.

No I am not suggesting you personally should do anything more.

My statement have a plan is as simple as that. It seems clear to me that some retail investors do not have any sort of plan.

They have never taken the time to ask what will I do if ‘X’ happens. They have never taken the time to sit down with their partner and say this is what I think we should do if ‘X’ occurs and have an agreed position.

I feel confident that there are retail holders who now are saying to themselves “Why didn’t we sell enough when it hit $2.34 to pay off the mortgage or the credit cards or paint the house or replace the car.”

I am not saying there is one perfect plan that suits every investors circumstances. What I am saying is not having any sort of plan is a receipe for disappointment.

My plan is to hold my key shares until the total value of my portfolio is “X” then reassess my plan.

I believe that between now and 2025 unless Puto blows up the world I will reach that target value.

I accept that the values of my shares will swing around but I cannot control that just like they did today.

By doing my research and being part of the 1,000 Eyes I am completely confident that nothing can come out of left field to destroy the fundamentals of Brainchip.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
Hi FF. I agree with what you are saying. If you don’t have a plan, you can miss out on taking healthy profits, you can freak out on a big red week and sell it all and then see it sky rocket the next week.

Having a plan doesn’t have to be elaborate, all it does is prepare you for success and protect you against losses.

Personally. I have the conviction to hold all my shares for as long as it takes for Brainchip to succeed globally.

I have held trough all the ups and downs since 2018 and am no longer worried about swings up and down. I simply understand and trust my position. Is it without risk? Maybe not, but I truely think the risk of complete failure is completely eliminated so for me it’s a question of what success will Brainchip have on a global scale and how long will it take to get there.

This is not financial advice to anyone obviously and just where I stand.

when I reach my share price target I will also reassess my plan.

I’m hoping this will happen by 2024 but I think 2025 is safe with how the industry is moving.

When this eventually happens. I’m taking the wife and kids to Europe for a year caravanning, and connecting with family in Norway.


And lastly. The trading pattern we are seeing here is to shake retail of their shares in my opinion. They will do whatever they can to shake retail of valuable shares. Price is only a distraction at this stage. Look at fundamentals/ partnerships/ news/ employment/ and eventually revenue.

Price will eventually follow. The fact we didn’t sustain yesterdays move on the news of Arm partnership has nothing to do with fundamentals and all to do with manipulation by institutions. And if it was retail selling then we don’t want them on this ship they will only hold us back;)
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 60 users

Lex555

Regular
From BrainChip's website, this is what I love most.

View attachment 6128
I interpret this as they believe BRN will have 70%+ of market. Maybe they’re so confident because of all their EAP, then I thought maybe because they decided to charge a lot less for royalties to ensure monopoly, say $0.10 instead of anticipated $1 per IP.

I doubt the later, as I’m sure the tech is worth more than just a few cents even in this early phase
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

MDhere

Top 20
alright who threw their order above 97.5 with that 1m3mil 97.5 sell order that thwarted my by at .99 grrrr
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Hi FF. I agree with what you are saying. If you don’t have a plan, you can miss out on taking healthy profits, you can freak out on a big red week and sell it all and then see it sky rocket the next week.

Having a plan doesn’t have to be elaborate, all it does is prepare you for success and protect you against losses.

Personally. I have the conviction to hold all my shares for as long as it takes for Brainchip to succeed globally.

I have held trough all the ups and downs since 2018 and am no longer worried about swings up and down. I simply understand and trust my position. Is it without risk? Maybe not, but I truely think the risk of complete failure is completely eliminated so for me it’s a question of what success will Brainchip have on a global scale and how long will it take to get there.

This is not financial advice to anyone obviously and just where I stand.

when I reach my share price target I will also reassess my plan.

I’m hoping this will happen by 2024 but I think 2025 is safe with how the industry is moving.

When this eventually happens. I’m taking the wife and kids to Europe for a year caravanning, and connecting with family in Norway.


And lastly. The trading pattern we are seeing here is to shake retail of their shares in my opinion. They will do whatever they can to shake retail of valuable shares. Price is only a distraction at this stage. Look at fundamentals/ partnerships/ news/ employment/ and eventually revenue.

Price will eventually follow. The fact we didn’t sustain yesterdays move on the news of Arm partnership has nothing to do with fundamentals and all to do with manipulation by institutions. And if it was retail selling then we don’t want them on this ship they will only hold us back;)
Hear, Hear and now for something completely different.

I have been taking my time to dig into the new website and am slowly unearthing interesting new things.

I am sure those who were over at the other place have a vivid memory of the downramper that in a number of guises raised the question of why did Brainchip not provide TOPS for comparison with other chips from other companies such as Nvidia. For those who do not recall the following is a simple definition of TOPS:

"What is TOPS? It means Trillions or Tera Operations per Second. It is primarily a measure of the maximum achievable throughput but not a measure of actual throughput. Most operations are MACs (multiply/accumulates), so TOPS = (number of MAC units) x (frequency of MAC operations) x 2.2 "

I am sure that most here will know that AKIDA is a new form of computing and does not do MACs and so TOPS are not really relevant as a measurement of its performance. This argument of course did not stop the downramper who made it his/her mission to run this red herring up the flagpole time and time again.

Well over on the new website this red herring has now been dealt with and put too bed once and for all with a TOPs performance being provided even though as we know it is not strictly relevant however it will allow those with a von Neuman background to see immediately that AKIDA is revolutionary not only in power but performance:

"Highly Configurable IP Platform

Flexible and scalable for multiple edge AI use cases.

BrainChip works with clients to achieve the most cost-effective solution by optimizing the node configuration to the desired level of performance and efficiency.

Scale down to 2 nodes for ultra low power or scale up to 256 nodes for complex use cases.

Multi-pass processing provides flexibility to process complex use cases with fewer nodes increasing power efficiency.

Quantization in MetaTF converts model weights and activations to lower bit format reducing memory requirement.

1652165241171.png

So now those who want to know can immediately when Brainchip states that it can process in REAL TIME what this means in traditional computing terms even if it is not the correct way to consider the AKIDA technology advantage.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 36 users
I interpret this as they believe BRN will have 70%+ of market. Maybe they’re so confident because of all their EAP, then I thought maybe because they decided to charge a lot less for royalties to ensure monopoly, say $0.10 instead of anticipated $1 per IP.

I doubt the later, as I’m sure the tech is worth more than just a few cents even in this early phase
Not wanting to alarm anyone but 70% of 70 billion US dollars by 2025 is 49 billion US dollars. I think we will have to combine resources so we have enough fingers and toes to count that high. LOL FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 33 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

Lex555

Regular
Not wanting to alarm anyone but 70% of 70 billion US dollars by 2025 is 49 billion US dollars. I think we will have to combine resources so we have enough fingers and toes to count that high. LOL FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
And with a revenue to price of 10 that $50bn is a market cap of $500 billion USD
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Dang Son

Regular
Hi FF. I agree with what you are saying. If you don’t have a plan, you can miss out on taking healthy profits, you can freak out on a big red week and sell it all and then see it sky rocket the next week.

Having a plan doesn’t have to be elaborate, all it does is prepare you for success and protect you against losses.

Personally. I have the conviction to hold all my shares for as long as it takes for Brainchip to succeed globally.

I have held trough all the ups and downs since 2018 and am no longer worried about swings up and down. I simply understand and trust my position. Is it without risk? Maybe not, but I truely think the risk of complete failure is completely eliminated so for me it’s a question of what success will Brainchip have on a global scale and how long will it take to get there.

This is not financial advice to anyone obviously and just where I stand.

when I reach my share price target I will also reassess my plan.

I’m hoping this will happen by 2024 but I think 2025 is safe with how the industry is moving.

When this eventually happens. I’m taking the wife and kids to Europe for a year caravanning, and connecting with family in Norway.


And lastly. The trading pattern we are seeing here is to shake retail of their shares in my opinion. They will do whatever they can to shake retail of valuable shares. Price is only a distraction at this stage. Look at fundamentals/ partnerships/ news/ employment/ and eventually revenue.

Price will eventually follow. The fact we didn’t sustain yesterdays move on the news of Arm partnership has nothing to do with fundamentals and all to do with manipulation by institutions. And if it was retail selling then we don’t want them on this ship they will only hold us back;)
I feel for those that came in on the last rush around $2
They either sold to cut their lost or now looking at 50% in the red.
It does lessen the pain on days like this being LTH already well green.
But $2 will look cheap once manipulators let it go again or can't hold us down.
IMO The Fed causes yet another trigger for wealth transfer.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Thinking
Reactions: 16 users

Mugen74

Regular
With a pe of 100 thats 5 trillion,@Yak52 mate you were downramping yesterday with 3.7 trillion😉
world domination.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 24 users
Lawyers even old retired ones are all about the fine print. Under Industrial on the new website the following appears:

automated decisions.
Finally, the need for machine learning to add classification categories without disrupting output is critical.
High performance (inferences/second), remarkable efficiency (microwatt), and one-shot on-chip learning, bring optimized productivity, reduced downtime, and improved security to your factory floor.
BrainChip has demonstrated and deployed capabilities for industrial applications including:
  • Object classification
  • Robotics control for vision, audition, tactile
  • Quality control
  • Machine control and preventative maintenance
industrial_2x.png

BrainChip works with industrial leaders to make their manufacturing environments smarter, more productive, and fundamentally secure.

Now in the fine print above the following appears:

"BrainChip has demonstrated and deployed capabilities for industrial applications including:
  • Object classification
  • Robotics control for vision, audition, tactile
  • Quality control
  • Machine control and preventative maintenance"
As far as I am aware BrainChip has not released details of an EAP yet who meets the description of a customer that would need these capabilities deployed in an industrial setting. Yet here it is stated as FACT. So I expect it has to be true. Why? Well this new website is not aimed at retail investors it is aimed at customers.

So suppose I am a customer and I ring up and after suitably verifying who I am and my genuine need to know I say can I see how one of these deployed object classifications, robotic controlled vision, audition, tactile, quality control or machine control and preventative maintenance is/are running in the real world I am unlikely to be impressed if Rob Telson replies sorry that is just for advertising it has not really happened.

So the point of the fine print is Brainchip must be considerably advanced in these four areas to make such a bold and definite statement and it strikes me that when we finally know who the remaining EAP's are that are expected to convert at least one will be engaged in the industrial use of AKIDA technology for these capabilities because these are the included deployed capabilities of which there are other capabilities deployed but not listed, based once again on the fine print.

So who are these INDUSTRIAL LEADERS that Brainchip is working with is the question?

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 66 users
Top Bottom