BRN Discussion Ongoing

Diogenese

Top 20
As much as Peter and others within the Brainchip executive like and admire Mike Davies I think our technology is far superior, our Brains department haven't stalled, we've continued to "accelerate" and to be perfectly honest I wouldn't entertain a takeover offer from Intel..I'll stick with Jensen..he'll front at some point. Not advice to buy..just an educated guess. The Texta ❤️
Hi Tech,

I wasn't suggesting a takeover. I just thought that, since Intel have their 18A process with gate-all-around that they would be better placed to do the tapeout, and, of course, take a licence.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 29 users

Labsy

Regular
Hey labsy! I Realy appreciate your postings. You have sense of humour as well but you know regarding the post of the “top 50 holder” those are some nice words indeed... However, I would be cautious with praise and compliments. T&J has many faces, and he once wrote a similar text in the HC and later mocked the support and all the likes he received. So, never trust anyone in an anonymous forum. And as you know…I'm also waiting for my ordered Bentley 😵‍💫.
Oh man...really? 🫣, It's hard to read sarcasm in a post. Thanks for the heads up. I'll block them. Should have guessed it when it said emerged. And hard to believe someone would double up after already in being top 50. That would mean over 20mill shares. I feel stupid.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 4 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Hi Tech,

I wasn't suggesting a takeover. I just thought that, since Intel have their 18A process with gate-all-around that they would be better placed to do the tapeout, and, of course, take a licence.



fingers-crossed-jenny-hagel.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 13 users

Guzzi62

Regular
Hi Tech,

I wasn't suggesting a takeover. I just thought that, since Intel have their 18A process with gate-all-around that they would be better placed to do the tapeout, and, of course, take a licence.
Really?

So are you saying that all those techinal persons can't see that and here you come and solve all their problems huh?

It's aperently a bit more complicated that that.

124000 people (minus 15000) and I am pretty sure a good deal of them are smarter than you, sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1 users
So Intel is under enormous pressure to get an AI accelerator.

Is Intel the mysterious Company "X" (not "the company formerly known as ...") that took over the Akida 2 tapeout after Anil announced BRN was about to commence the process?
Intel either embrace us or end up on the scrap heap selling themselves out for a few $$$ Peter/Anil oops sorry I mean @Diogenese

1724751835266.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

Slade

Top 20
Really?

So are you saying that all those techinal persons can't see that and here you come and solve all their problems huh?

It's aperently a bit more complicated that that.

124000 people (minus 15000) and I am pretty sure a good deal of them are smarter than you, sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
PVDM is one person. But you have truly just written a BS post. Thats because of who you are as a person. You need to do better. Much better.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Guzzi62

Regular
PVDM is one person. But you have truly just written a BS post. Thats because of who you are as a person. You need to do better. Much better.
Really, what's wrong of being realistisk huh?
 

Slade

Top 20
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 13 users

TECH

Regular
Hi Tech,

I wasn't suggesting a takeover. I just thought that, since Intel have their 18A process with gate-all-around that they would be better placed to do the tapeout, and, of course, take a licence.
Totally agree with ur opinion.
It never even crossed my mind that you were suggesting a takeover Dio..I created that all by myself 🤪
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

FromBeyond

Member
Really?

So are you saying that all those techinal persons can't see that and here you come and solve all their problems huh?

It's aperently a bit more complicated that that.

124000 people (minus 15000) and I am pretty sure a good deal of them are smarter than you, sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
Worm alert. It's shovel time.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

Kachoo

Regular
It is true Intel need a market they can win fast in to help out the SP.

BRN would compliment them with IP but will they do it is the question. That be a very hard meeting with Mike!

Well Mike we just got this IP we need you to play with its called Akida see what you can do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Looks like some friends in Japan, with a little support from Megachips, have been playing with Akida & MetaTF :)

Apols if already posted as I may have missed it and haven't done a search.

Short video end of post.

Paper HERE

IMG_20240827_211716.jpg




License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2408.13018v1 [cs.RO] 23 Aug 2024

Robust Iterative Value Conversion: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Neurochip-driven Edge Robots​

Yuki Kadokawakadokawa.yuki@naist.ac.jpTomohito Koderakodera.tomohito.kp9@is.naist.jpYoshihisa Tsuruminetsurumine.yoshihisa@is.naist.jpShinya Nishimuranishimura.shinya@megachips.co.jpTakamitsu Matsubaratakam-m@is.naist.jpNara Institute of Science and Technology, 630-0192, Nara, Japan MegaChips Corporation, 532-0003, Osaka, Japan

Abstract​

A neurochip is a device that reproduces the signal processing mechanisms of brain neurons and calculates Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) with low power consumption and at high speed. Thus, neurochips are attracting attention from edge robot applications, which suffer from limited battery capacity. This paper aims to achieve deep reinforcement learning (DRL) that acquires SNN policies suitable for neurochip implementation. Since DRL requires a complex function approximation, we focus on conversion techniques from Floating Point NN (FPNN) because it is one of the most feasible SNN techniques. However, DRL requires conversions to SNNs for every policy update to collect the learning samples for a DRL-learning cycle, which updates the FPNN policy and collects the SNN policy samples. Accumulative conversion errors can significantly degrade the performance of the SNN policies. We propose Robust Iterative Value Conversion (RIVC) as a DRL that incorporates conversion error reduction and robustness to conversion errors. To reduce them, FPNN is optimized with the same number of quantization bits as an SNN. The FPNN output is not significantly changed by quantization. To robustify the conversion error, an FPNN policy that is applied with quantization is updated to increase the gap between the probability of selecting the optimal action and other actions. This step prevents unexpected replacements of the policy’s optimal actions. We verified RIVC’s effectiveness on a neurochip-driven robot. The results showed that RIVC consumed 1/15 times less power and increased the calculation speed by five times more than an edge CPU (quad-core ARM Cortex-A72). The previous framework with no countermeasures against conversion errors failed to train the policies. Videos from our experiments are available:

Excerpts:


5.1 Construction of Learning System for Experiments​

5.1.1 Entire Experiment Settings​

This section describes the construction of the proposed framework shown in Fig. 2. We utilized a desktop PC equipped with a GPU (Nvidia RTX3090) for updating the policies and an Akida Neural Processor SoC as a neurochip [9, 12]. The robot was controlled by the policies implemented in the neurochip. SNNs were implemented to the neurochip by a conversion executed by the MetaTF of Akida that converts the software [9, 12]. Samples were collected by the SNN policies in both the simulation tasks and the real-robot tasks since the target task is neurochip-driven robot control. For learning, the GPU updates the policies based on the collected samples in the real-robot environment. Concerning the SNN structure, the quantization of weights 𝑤𝑠 described in Eq. (16) and the calculation accuracy of the activation functions described in Eq. (19) are verified in a range from 2- to 8-bits; they are the implementation constraints of the neurochip [9].

Table 3: Hardware performance of policies: FPNN was evaluated by edge-CPU (Raspberry Pi 4: quad-core ARM Cortex-A72). SNN was evaluated by neurochip (Akida 1000 [9]). “Power cons” and “Calc. speed” denote power consumption and calculation speed for obtaining one action from NN policies using each piece of hardware. Power consumption was measured by voltage checker (TAP-TST8N).

HardwareEdge-CPUNeurochip
NetworkFPNNSNN
Power consumption [mW]614
Calculation speed [ms]20540

7 Conclusion​

We proposed RIVC as a novel DRL framework for training SNN policies with a neurochip in real-robot environments. RIVC offers two prominent features: 1) it trains QNN policies, which can be robust for conversion to SNN policies, and 2) it updates the values with GIO, which is robust to the optimal action replacements by conversion to SNN policies. We also implemented RIVC for object-tracking tasks with a neurochip in real-robot environments. Our experiments show that RIVC can train SNN policies by DRL in real-robot environments.

Acknowledgments​

This work was supported by the MegaChips Corporation. We thank Alonso Ramos Fernandez for his experimental assistance.

 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 66 users

MegaportX

Regular
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 16 users

DK6161

Regular
Hi BRN holders,

I don’t post on the stock forums but regularly read most of the commentary and genuinely appreciate the contributions of many intelligent posters here.

I am a top 50 holder and have never felt so confident about the success of our company, having spoken to BOD during the last AGM and having done my own research.

I have since doubled my holdings during the SPP period but it was all bought on the market for 2 reasons, 1st to hit the manipulators/shorters directly and 2nd the price being lower.

All I can say is that I won’t be selling the shares unless it has hit my target price.
So, the shorters and manipulators can play whatever tactics they want but they aren’t getting my shares.

If you believe in the company, then the only way to counter the manipulation is to buy more shares if you can afford to or hold your existing holdings tight - the manipulators will have to give up eventually.

Keep the faith chippers, our time is coming.
If any genuine shareholder wants to make contact then they can do so via this forum - I won’t be replying to non holders/ non believers and/or trolls !!

DYOR, no financial advice etc……
Great post.
I share the same opinion. Being a top 20 shareholder I am more confidence now than ever with all the deals that we have signed. Looks like this year is definitely our year.
Not advice
 
  • Haha
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
Great post.
I share the same opinion. Being a top 20 shareholder I am more confidence now than ever with all the deals that we have signed. Looks like this year is definitely our year.
Not advice
Now who’s being a silly goose

1724785603903.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users
Great post.
I share the same opinion. Being a top 20 shareholder I am more confidence now than ever with all the deals that we have signed. Looks like this year is definitely our year.
Not advice
Seeing as this seems to be a pissing contest with no proof required. I am known to my friends as PVDM. 😁

SC
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 16 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 45 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 43 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
1000017967.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 46 users
Extract from a Forbes article talking about LiDAR technology......


Valeo: is designed into the Mercedes S-Class with its SCALA 2 LiDAR (currently in production) to support its L3 autonomy feature. Its next-generation version, the SCALA 3 uses a similar platform as the SCALA 2, but delivers significantly higher range and resolution performance. (SCALA 2 addresses 80 m range and 300,000 pps in a ~ 600 cm³ volume with a square format. SCALA 3 doubles the range and delivers 10M pps in a ~1000 cm³ volume, with a 45 mm height and rectangular format suitable for roof or behind-the-grill mounting). The higher performance of the SCALA 3 is expected to double the speeds at which the L3 autonomy feature can perform. Valeo is also attempting to standardize the SCALA 3 and minimize/eliminate customization to create economies of scale. SCALA 3 is expected to start production by early 2025 and has been selected by Stellantis and another undisclosed global OEM to support L3 autonomy features.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 26 users
Top Bottom