BRN Discussion Ongoing

[jtardif999]

Whatever mate, spin it however you like and bury your head in the sand. Since we ‘commercialised’, our SP has halved.

Employee numbers, partnerships, and conferences all mean diddly squat if the product isn’t selling. Which, evidently, it isn’t.

Also, it’s funny how the permabulls get personnel everytime someone says something against their narrative.

‘We commercialised’ - the commercialisation process for a company in the business that BrainChip are in could take years to come to fruition. You make it sound like they commercialised so where’s the money, it’s not that straightforward. AIMO.

 

[Galaxycar]

Unless Sean pu

I attended one of the meetings and I share FF’s view.
FF myself and others grilled Sean on better communication and Sean agreed that there can be better communication and that he will try to attend Australia more often!
He also said he was hoping to be back before the next AGM!!

Unless one of the biggest rabbit tricks are pulled out of his hat he is gone for all money and won’t be back next AGM,we had the numbers for strike 1 and now with more shareholders pissed with management and the directors all looking like strike 2 will be a forgone conclusion. As besides you select few who get access should,not get,at least 70 percent of shareholders are pissed,why question and speak to happy investors it’s the unhappy that will vote with their feet.

 

[Dhm]

This landed in my inbox, apologies if it has been posted before.

https://brainchip.com/tenns-a-new-approach-to-streaming-and-sequential-data/

And this is the video accompanying it

 

[thelittleshort]

RA8 Series CM85-based MCUs Running Cyberon NLU | Bernd Westhoff

Advanced natural language processing on the Renesas RA8M1 MCU using the Arm Cortex M85 core and Cyberon solution without the needs for a cloud connection. Check it out!

www.linkedin.com

 

[Kachoo]

Unless Sean pu

Unless one of the biggest rabbit tricks are pulled out of his hat he is gone for all money and won’t be back next AGM,we had the numbers for strike 1 and now with more shareholders pissed with management and the directors all looking like strike 2 will be a forgone conclusion. As besides you select few who get access should,not get,at least 70 percent of shareholders are pissed,why question and speak to happy investors it’s the unhappy that will vote with their feet.

I'm not so confident with this strike 2. I feel it looks like there is an attempt to shake the board possibly for a more accommodating board for a cheap take-over. Many of the adgendas hear and complaints have hidden positions and marketing plans people.

Let's be honest the price was over the top at 1.20s arguably people will build their own opinions on value. This is mine.

At this price we can argue we are undervalue the board feels that too.

So if you forget the past and look at the value being say discounted just my opinion of 66% or 3 times today's prices what would you do with your new money. This is not financial advice but yeah I would look at getting 3 dollars returned on one dollar and not keep crying about the past my opinion.

But if your a genuine holder your not doing your wallet a favour by continually bagging management .

Heck BRN has had many job opening why do you not apply and improve the outlook your add value they will give you shares too and pay you. Well likely not as your not qualified for the job hence your opinions likely result as shitty advice.

Now if your agenda is to keep sowing doubt we'll that is your agenda.

As genuine investor I'm more shocked at all the negative responses then the pumps that happened. But I guess freedom of speech is yours.

Just don't bite the hand that may feed you eventually you may regret it.

 

[MrRomper]

At the risk of being boring....or worse dumb and boring.....I've now own 1.245m shares.

My current/ultimate wife (I am MUCH too old to consider her as penultimate) has this all set for my tombstone engraving....

GOOD GUY.....GULLIBLE THOUGH

(And to emphasize, she married me)

DYOD

DYOD - Do Your Own Divorce!

 

[charles2]

DYOD - Do Your Own Divorce!

FYI

En español la palabra/el infinitivo 'romper' significa 'to break'

 

[Schnitzel lover]

Hi HG
I received an invitation to attend from Investor Relations at Perth. There were other shareholders in attendance who I assume were also invited. Sean Hehir, Geoff Carrick and Tony Dawe were present.

Sean Hehir had Sydney meetings before this meeting. I don’t know who with but the next morning he was to meet with Pitt Street Research to record the interview that has been released.

I understand he then flew to Melbourne with Tony Dawe where he met with other retail shareholders.

He then flew to Perth with Tony Dawe and believe on Wednesday he met with other retail shareholders. I think it was said that Peter van der Made may be attending that meeting.

The meeting in Sydney was two hours and very informal. I did not drink any alcohol and do not consider myself anyone’s drinking buddy particularly when it comes to investing.

The retail shareholders expressed concerns about two things. Communication and shorting price manipulation. Apart from these issues the meeting proceeded as a Q. & A.

I personally did not learn anything of substance I did not already know from previous publicly released company communications and my personal research.

The shareholders I spoke to after the meeting expressed the view that they had not learned anything new but that they thought Sean Hehir presented as confident about the future, the AKIDA technology and truly interested to listen to retail shareholders.

Regards
Fact Finder

I don’t quite understand what there is to be gained by sharing this information on this forum FF? I am absolutely staggered you would put this down into words on a public forum..

Why would you basically spell out to the world that there’s a group of investors who get private privileges with the company to partake in meetings that are not made open to all shareholders?

For some, it brings into question the sudden price and volume movement of a week ago and makes questionable your motives of suddenly reappearing here. You would NOT want to have been buying on market under such circumstances.

However, fret not.
I can say with unquestionable fact. All the people that attended such meetings have no measurable advantage over other shareholders. It often works the other way because you feel connected and are more likely to fall for the A-type speak of ambitious executives, over the plain and simple facts that stare us in the face.. Not yet commercially successful!

What it highlights most of all his how unprofessional it makes management of the company come across and continued poor form in the way they conduct business with select shareholders..

As always, this is just my opinion..

 

[Home101]

I'm not so confident with this strike 2. I feel it looks like there is an attempt to shake the board possibly for a more accommodating board for a cheap take-over. Many of the adgendas hear and complaints have hidden positions and marketing plans people.

Let's be honest the price was over the top at 1.20s arguably people will build their own opinions on value. This is mine.

At this price we can argue we are undervalue the board feels that too.

So if you forget the past and look at the value being say discounted just my opinion of 66% or 3 times today's prices what would you do with your new money. This is not financial advice but yeah I would look at getting 3 dollars returned on one dollar and not keep crying about the past my opinion.

But if your a genuine holder your not doing your wallet a favour by continually bagging management .

Heck BRN has had many job opening why do you not apply and improve the outlook your add value they will give you shares too and pay you. Well likely not as your not qualified for the job hence your opinions likely result as shitty advice.

Now if your agenda is to keep sowing doubt we'll that is your agenda.

As genuine investor I'm more shocked at all the negative responses then the pumps that happened. But I guess freedom of speech is yours.

Just don't bite the hand that may feed you eventually you may regret it.

For me, i am kind of okay with the first strike, the management needed to given a message of shareholder discontent. But beyond that, thinking of 2nd strike makes no sense. It will only negatively impact the company and the shareholders. So, people here continuously talking of second strikes could have an agenda, that certainly won’t be favor of the shareholders.

 

[wilzy123]

I don’t quite understand what there is to be gained by sharing this information on this forum FF? I am absolutely staggered you would put this down into words on a public forum..

Why would you basically spell out to the world that there’s a group of investors who get private privileges with the company to partake in meetings that are not made open to all shareholders?

For some, it brings into question the sudden price and volume movement of a week ago and makes questionable your motives of suddenly reappearing here. You would NOT want to have been buying on market under such circumstances.

However, fret not.
I can say with unquestionable fact. All the people that attended such meetings have no measurable advantage over other shareholders. It often works the other way because you feel connected and are more likely to fall for the A-type speak of ambitious executives, over the plain and simple facts that stare us in the face.. Not yet commercially successful!

What it highlights most of all his how unprofessional it makes management of the company come across and continued poor form in the way they conduct business with select shareholders..

As always, this is just my opinion..

You sound confused champ.

First you imply that there are advantages: "that there’s a group of investors who get private privileges with the company to partake in meetings that are not made open to all shareholders?".

Then you say that there isn't an advantage: "All the people that attended such meetings have no measurable advantage over other shareholders"

Then you say that it is a disadvantage and imply that those who participate are most likely gullible fools "It often works the other way because you feel connected and are more likely to fall for the A-type speak of ambitious executives, over the plain and simple facts that stare us in the face"

Which is it lol? Or were you just talking to yourself on a public forum?

 

[TheUnfairAdvantage]

You sound confused champ.

First you imply that there are advantages: "that there’s a group of investors who get private privileges with the company to partake in meetings that are not made open to all shareholders?".

Then you say that there isn't an advantage: "All the people that attended such meetings have no measurable advantage over other shareholders"

Then you say that it is a disadvantage and that those who participate are most likely gullible fools "It often works the other way because you feel connected and are more likely to fall for the A-type speak of ambitious executives, over the plain and simple facts that stare us in the face"

Which is it lol? Or were you just talking to yourself on a public forum?

Once again Wilzy. No substance added. At least we didn’t get a gif.

He actually makes a good point. Definitely not confused at all.

I think the disclosure of the special invite meeting and the secrecy of it all smells a little. It’s a bit like Sean and Tony have made the special meetings with the movers and shakers of TSEx to help calm the pitch fork wielding tribe. Might have back fired due to the tribe feeling a little betrayed and left of centre right at this point.

I hold what I believe to be a considerable sum of shares and belong to a group of friends, family and associates who together hold a very large number of shares. Our collective sentiment is definitely “concerned” with the current state of commercialisation but not “worried”. The need to brief a small number of individuals on this commercialisation strategy adds to the “ concern”. Schnitty has a right to also express an opinion as do I. Your right of reply doesn’t necessarily mean you are “right”.

I’m guessing your reply also reflects your “concern” on the current state of play.

 

[JB49]

View attachment 49671
View attachment 49673

RA8 Series CM85-based MCUs Running Cyberon NLU | Bernd Westhoff

Advanced natural language processing on the Renesas RA8M1 MCU using the Arm Cortex M85 core and Cyberon solution without the needs for a cloud connection. Check it out!

www.linkedin.com

Now this is something that we can definitely without a doubt say is us!

 

[Damo4]

Sounds like people are focussing on the the wrong part of these meeting discussions.
Attending members have confirmed nothing was said that provided extra information.
Instead it was about an opportunity to listen to what some SH's concerns were.
It sounds like every time one of these meeting is held the concerns belong to the same group of thoughts.

Communication is a 2 way street. I see many posts about their complaints falling on deaf ears, yet when they are raised constructively directly with management, you aren't happy?
People are peppering Tony's emails with abuse then turn around and ask why they aren't getting responses?

Just a bit confused why people feel so entitled to face to face meetings with management, when they have likely never attended AGMs, contacted members via email and/or maintained a professional relationships with individual members.

You've got to remember this forum represents less than 10% of the total holders (closer to 5%).
Any "influence" you think FF, SERA2g, Chapman etc is a bit silly when thinking of the larger picture.
90% of holders aren't on this forum, so a TSEx conspiracy is wild.
Just sounds like people are feeling left out.

 

[Vladsblood]

Perhaps the meetings with certain shareholders were based on the amount of shares they hold and that for you not being invited is because you don't hold a significant % of shares. I didn't get a invite and don't hold a significant holding compared to say the top 50 and would expect a invite.
Maybe buy more to get the access.
Have a happy day

Yep just like the politicians and the elites along with bankers they are so far above us that we are just the tow alongside…agm the tow alongside can vote…Vlad

 

[Vladsblood]

Sounds like people are focussing on the the wrong part of these meeting discussions.
Attending members have confirmed nothing was said that provided extra information.
Instead it was about an opportunity to listen to what some SH's concerns were.
It sounds like every time one of these meeting is held the concerns belong to the same group of thoughts.

Communication is a 2 way street. I see many posts about their complaints falling on deaf ears, yet when they are raised constructively directly with management, you aren't happy?
People are peppering Tony's emails with abuse then turn around and ask why they aren't getting responses?

Just a bit confused why people feel so entitled to face to face meetings with management, when they have likely never attended AGMs, contacted members via email and/or maintained a professional relationships with individual members.

You've got to remember this forum represents less than 10% of the total holders (closer to 5%).
Any "influence" you think FF, SERA2g, Chapman etc is a bit silly when thinking of the larger picture.
90% of holders aren't on this forum, so a TSEx conspiracy is wild.
Just sounds like people are feeling left out.

Insider info is always denied “nothing was said..” same as all western countries government Vlad

 

[TECH]

New GenX320 Sensor Wins CES 2024 Innovation Award

Prophesee has been named a CES® 2024 Innovation Awards Honoree for its GenX320 Event-based Metavision sensor, the industry’s smallest and most power-efficient event-based vision sensor.

www.prophesee.ai

Well done partner.

Tech.

 

[Schnitzel lover]

The chart will always tell all I need to know..
I think we still all want the same thing..

Just hope you’ve got yourself covered legally for disclosing in writing this sort of stuff FF..

 

[Fact Finder]

I don’t quite understand what there is to be gained by sharing this information on this forum FF? I am absolutely staggered you would put this down into words on a public forum..

Why would you basically spell out to the world that there’s a group of investors who get private privileges with the company to partake in meetings that are not made open to all shareholders?

For some, it brings into question the sudden price and volume movement of a week ago and makes questionable your motives of suddenly reappearing here. You would NOT want to have been buying on market under such circumstances.

However, fret not.
I can say with unquestionable fact. All the people that attended such meetings have no measurable advantage over other shareholders. It often works the other way because you feel connected and are more likely to fall for the A-type speak of ambitious executives, over the plain and simple facts that stare us in the face.. Not yet commercially successful!

What it highlights most of all his how unprofessional it makes management of the company come across and continued poor form in the way they conduct business with select shareholders..

As always, this is just my opinion..

What I find most interesting is how transparent you and the other manipulators are but I should not be surprised given the proven depths of human depravity.

Personal attacks, threats of spills, pompous claims of self importance and financial sophistication.

Uninformed claims that a spill will remove a CEO.

The ignorance and misinformation rains down like a river.

Go and read the Rules a spill has no implications for the Chairman or the CEO particularly when the spill is led by disgruntled retail shareholders who manage to cobble together 25% on two occasions. The existing Board simply nominates again and are elected because they don’t even have to get 50% of the possible vote at the spill meeting.

The only one’s who win from a spill are the shorts, the manipulators and the trolls.

Retail shareholders will always loose.

Sharing publicly available information has not and will not ever be a cause for concern however ignorance and sinister intent will always be a trigger to be careful as the purveyor is someone not to be trusted.

Those who might be influenced by these flawed individuals should ask why has not one of these individuals challenged or unpicked the information that is contained in my earlier post?

Why have they not identified the untruths?

Why have they not identified and laid bare the price sensitive insider information that they seek to rage against?

Can they not find it?

Why have they not considered that the CEO and Board of a publicly listed company randomly sampling the views of a group of shareholders to understand their concerns beyond the simplicity of the day to day share price might be a good thing?

It was clear that the shareholders who attended in Sydney cut across age, social circumstance and were not selected based on the size of their wallet or shareholding.

Or dare I say what institution they worked at or what broker they break bread with on the weekend.

They gave all the outward appearance of a random selection and not an elite group of so called sophisticated or institutional investors.

Does this failure to only speak with the so called elites offend their collective sense of entitlement?

Do they fear their position as controllers of wealth and hence power may be undermined?

Real people with real concerns such as wives, husbands, children, retirement plans, fixed incomes, mortgages, relatives and friends who had invested on their advice in other words real people who only had one thing in common they have invested their hard earned in Brainchip and had concerns like the genuine shareholders who post here.

While the attacks have been directed at me these warriors of all that is disgusting about the ASX and social media are at the same time denigrating all the other real shareholders who took up this first in their lifetime opportunity to have a voice and be heard by those in charge of the company they have invested in.

Who among this group here would if offered the same opportunity to be heard not accept with a virtuous heart?

It is clear what the individuals who have played the man instead of the ball are about and it is not ensuring that an investment in Brainchip pays off for all shareholders.

My opinion only DYOR though Blind Freddie says their intent is obvious.

Regards
Fact Finder

 

[Humble Genius]

Hi HG
I received an invitation to attend from Investor Relations at Perth. There were other shareholders in attendance who I assume were also invited. Sean Hehir, Geoff Carrick and Tony Dawe were present.

Sean Hehir had Sydney meetings before this meeting. I don’t know who with but the next morning he was to meet with Pitt Street Research to record the interview that has been released.

I understand he then flew to Melbourne with Tony Dawe where he met with other retail shareholders.

He then flew to Perth with Tony Dawe and believe on Wednesday he met with other retail shareholders. I think it was said that Peter van der Made may be attending that meeting.

The meeting in Sydney was two hours and very informal. I did not drink any alcohol and do not consider myself anyone’s drinking buddy particularly when it comes to investing.

The retail shareholders expressed concerns about two things. Communication and shorting price manipulation. Apart from these issues the meeting proceeded as a Q. & A.

I personally did not learn anything of substance I did not already know from previous publicly released company communications and my personal research.

The shareholders I spoke to after the meeting expressed the view that they had not learned anything new but that they thought Sean Hehir presented as confident about the future, the AKIDA technology and truly interested to listen to retail shareholders.

Regards
Fact Finder

Thanks FF, much appreciated.

 

[gex]

Few flogs popping up lately...