Fact Finder
Top 20
The issue for me with these types of awards is that despite the claim to being independent when you read through the website the company behind this is about making a profit by building a brand that other companies will aspire to have on their home page or product. They are encouraging the companies nominated to get involved with them and as they call it have fun with their nomination to the short list.Well I can just imagine what the judges will think.
They'll probably look at all the other tech/competition and say, if these guys used AKIDA themselves, wouldn't they improve their own products/Tech?
(silence hits the room, other companies look down at their feet)
Well the winner is .................![]()
So the unanswered question is did Brainchip nominate itself or did the owners of this award scheme nominate them based on some yet to be exposed criteria. Did Dr. Google or CHATGpt select the short listed nominees.
Being a winner in all three categories will be nice and allow for Brainchip to include this in their Career adds and on their webpage and even run it up the flag pole at the AGM which happily falls after the results are announced.
Following the list of panel judges there is a nomination form calling for further judges to apply. Some of the judges apart from the three I referred to do not on the face of their CV's have any better qualifications than most of us here to judge a very diverse selection of technology types.
So in the end it might just boil down to a 'that sounds good decision' without an in depth appreciation of the underlying technology.
Anyway just in case I sent the web address to Tony Dawe and received an acknowledgment that it had been received and he was referring it on to Marketing to investigate.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA