Advertised roles at BrainChip differ between the website and LinkedIn page
View attachment 28794
View attachment 28793
View attachment 28789
View attachment 28790
View attachment 28792
View attachment 28791
LinkedIn Login, Sign in | LinkedIn
Login to LinkedIn to keep in touch with people you know, share ideas, and build your career.www.linkedin.com
View attachment 28796
LinkedIn Login, Sign in | LinkedIn
Login to LinkedIn to keep in touch with people you know, share ideas, and build your career.www.linkedin.com
View attachment 28796
Iām still wanting to know if we are still dealing with many Las Vegas casinos and Shanghai Police! That would take my mind off the very disappointing share price. Surely the 1000 Eyes canāt be the only educated group of sleuths about all things Brainchip? It beggars belief that the most brilliantly positioned company within edge computing is continually savaged by those accursed shorters. Donāt the fund managers who lend the shares to these lowlifes hate the fact that the daily revaluation of their position is down the toilet?I've been wasting my time on the internet and came across some earlier announcements by Brainchip that may shed some thought on other industry uses for Akida. Just note this is from 2016, but some of us may not know that we are (hopefully not were) in a number of areas not recently discussed.
https://brainchip.com/brainchip-acq...ision-technology-company-spikenet-technology/
View attachment 28621
View attachment 28622
View attachment 28623
Good lookin' photo of PVDM
View attachment 28624
I don't disagree that the ecosystem is building a great platform for the future. I was just addressing the fact that Sean's focus is converting sales activity to paid licenses and we can't seem to convert them right now.Iāll admit I am biased as I think Brainchip is doing a great job in building itās ecosystem
Obviously weāre all waiting for revenue to push the shareprice higher, hopefully vertical.
Iām sure all the companies that have Brainchip linked to them, via partnerships, agreements etc are in business to make money too.
All fighting for market share and to beat their competitors hence the NDAās.
Just based on the knowns at this stage. With all the current known companies pushing our ground breaking science fiction beast to make themselves money how likely is it that as time goes by there will be a tidal wave of products and revenue inbound.
At what stage are we truly de-risked and undervalued (rhetorical question)!
NASA
FORD
VALEO
MERCEDES
SIFIVE
MAGIKEYE
MEGACHIPS
RENESAS
BIOTOME
PROPHESEE
EDGE IMPULSE
ARM
NVISO
GLOBAL FOUNDRIES
VVDN
SOCIONEXT
MOSCHIP
INTEL
NANOSE
And Iām sure there are plenty who could confidently argue a lot more, e.g. ISL, RIVERSIDE RESEARCH, BASCOMHUNTER TECHNOLOGIES, TATA and the rest of the icebeg!
There is plenty of information to suggest Neural Networks and Edge are going to have a massive impact in the near future and for the next decade at least. Being the first and best in class will give us a great head start on becoming ubiquitous!
At what stage are we happy we will achieve @Fact Finder ās %1 of the growing market.
Despite the current SP sideways woes itās my opinion there are great times ahead in transferring wealth from the inpatient to the patient!
Good luck to all holders!
TBH I think we do, in fact, need China. A deal there could stop the rot. I'm not sure who/why/when we decided that we didn't need them. Perhaps we were blinded by the SP at the time. Now we need to eat humble pie. It's not that difficult. Trust is a transitive relationship. If the CEO can't trust us with his plans for the future, he should be replaced by someone who will, and we can trust that person in return. It's not too late for the BoD to share their plans, but after the next annual report just might be.
Hint: any material deal will do at this stage.
TBH I think we do, in fact, need China. A deal there could stop the rot. I'm not sure who/why/when we decided that we didn't need them. Perhaps we were blinded by the SP at the time. Now we need to eat humble pie. It's not that difficult. Trust is a transitive relationship. If the CEO can't trust us with his plans for the future, he should be replaced by someone who will, and we can trust that person in return. It's not too late for the BoD to share their plans, but after the next annual report just might be.
Hint: any material deal will do at this stage.
0% sounds a fair share if you ask me.We have 0% of the exploding market.
It is up to the CEO to come up with a coherent plan for the next 6 months, not FF
Maybe our CEO can move sideways to 4DS or wherever, or he can deliver results with an amazing, proven product.
Depends if it's a toy for kids or a toy for adults. There is plenty info on pelredictive maintenance on BRN site that was one of the first uses.Why would predictive maintenance need to be classified?
We have 0% of the exploding market.
It is up to the CEO to come up with a coherent plan for the next 6 months, not FF
Maybe our CEO can move sideways to 4DS or wherever, or he can deliver results with an amazing, proven product.
I trust they are trying to, but you can only reward results. Give someone else a go.I trust them to do their job
I was under the impression that the US federal government won't allow any new tech to fall in the hands of Xi's regime, let alone this little disruptive gem.TBH I think we do, in fact, need China. A deal there could stop the rot. I'm not sure who/why/when we decided that we didn't need them. Perhaps we were blinded by the SP at the time. Now we need to eat humble pie. It's not that difficult. Trust is a transitive relationship. If the CEO can't trust us with his plans for the future, he should be replaced by someone who will, and we can trust that person in return. It's not too late for the BoD to share their plans, but after the next annual report just might be.
Hint: any material deal will do at this stage.
We have 0% of the exploding market.
It is up to the CEO to come up with a coherent plan for the next 6 months, not FF
Maybe our CEO can move sideways to 4DS or wherever, or he can deliver results with an amazing, proven product.
I think the decision was made some time ago. America or China!
I donāt know all the legislative details of it but the move to ban all Americans working in China on technological issues couldnāt be stronger.
It was a case of come home or lose American Citizenship!
Itās not unrealistic for there to be armed conflict with China in the near future. Do we really want to help them gain a technological advantage?
Personally I donāt want to sell my soul!