BRN Discussion Ongoing


Major Key players profiled in the report include:
Applied Brain Research
BrainChip Holdings
General Vision
HRL Laboratories
HP Development Company
IBM Corporation
Intel Corporation
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Qualcomm Technologies
Samsung Electronics …


we are on the second place!!!
😛 It's in alphabetical order.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 17 users

Sirod69

bavarian girl ;-)
😛 Es ist in alphabetischer Reihenfolge.
1656430974454.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 7 users
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Krustor

Regular
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 21 users
This of course is the only reason we are not ranked as number 1 🥳👍
That is indeed correct:cool:
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 25 users

cosors

👀
It would be like Rolex deciding to use an inferior plastic part rather than high grade 904L steel.
Qualcomm and snapdragon have been discussed before also.
I like the comparison with Grand Seiko better. They are simply better and fit better with our understatement of not putting our money where our mouth is 🤭

Off topic and no advertising, I just like them a lot better and they do everything better than Rolex. Just my opinion...
mh, many better s

The comparison is also very interesting when you compare the technology of their Spring Drive with Nviso and Akida vs ICs.
Believe in visions and be persistent

It took them decades to develop their own IC that was energy efficient enough or gave them the technology that made this drive possible in the first place.
https://grandseikogs9club.com/chronicle-9/history-spring-drive/

https://www.ablogtowatch.com/history-seiko-spring-drive-movement/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 7 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest

Implementing edge AI: Look before you leap​

June 28, 2022 Douglas Fairbairn



As the need for artificial intelligence grows more common and technology needs become more sophisticated, companies looking to adopt edge AI into their products often find it to be a difficult challenge. But what makes it so difficult, and what solutions exist to solve this problem?
Perhaps the single biggest issue that companies face in implementing edge AI is that most companies don’t have the resources in house to develop these sophisticated fast-changing technologies. Lack of trained personnel and little familiarity with design flow often leads to delayed timelines and excess expense to train team members. In addition, there are so many choices, it is impossible for engineers to explore each option. And since every application is different, it may not be appropriate to replicate solutions based on past implementations. However, by asking a few key questions and finding the right partner to take your project from ideation to silicon, any enterprise can develop a roadmap to successfully deploy edge AI in their devices.
Defining Use Cases And Feasibility
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL DOWN TO CONTINUE READING
It is important to define use cases before exploring implementation options. The first question any business should ask is: What would the customer find truly useful? After pinpointing the functionality the customer wants, your team needs to set development and production cost goals along with the acceptable time to market.
Now comes the challenging part – making technology-related decisions. Is it possible to implement that functionality within the cost, time, power and space tradeoffs you’re dealing with? Working with an experienced partner/consultant or drawing on internal experience is critical at this stage. You won’t have perfect data on which to base your decision, so actual experience is essential in making these judgements.
Technology Choice
There are several choices a team can make to implement the customer’s desired functionality in the product. Depending on your available resources and development time, here are some of the choices a team might consider:
ADVERTISING

  • Software only on the existing embedded processor – This may require very carefully coded models in order to achieve the desired performance. Functionality may be limited, but it is generally the lowest cost solution if it works. Because this is a software-only solution, upgrades or bug fixes are more easily addressed.
  • Upgrade/replace the existing processor – This can be a great solution if you can make it work and preserve existing code base, and like the solution above, is software-only and can be easily fixed or upgraded. However, this can often start a project down a slippery path that requires extensive power and performance evaluation. Companies may be better off adding a neural network (NN) or similar accelerator.
  • Add a fixed neural network accelerator – This is an optimum choice if there is a good match with the needs of the application, as evaluation and design may not be too difficult. It could very well provide excellent power/performance tradeoffs at a very reasonable cost.
  • FPGA – This solution is flexible and upgradable, but typically comes with high cost and high power for the final product. Rarely is this a good choice for “edge” products.
  • Dedicated SoC – Often this is the optimum choice for high volume, low cost and low power products where use cases are clearly defined.
How To Evaluate The Right Choice
It can be difficult to evaluate the right choice without expertise from trained professionals in the edge AI chip space. Evaluation of each option can often take a long time and require extensive knowledge. For example, evaluating a fixed accelerator versus an FPGA implementation can require engineers with different skill sets. With so many vendors and solutions making conflicting claims, making basic decisions can be overwhelming for most enterprises.
One of the most important steps one can take is to find the right partner who can help evaluate the technology tradeoffs and take the company from the initial research and evaluation stage to the design and implementation of the solution. Also, don’t get hung up on finding the solution with the “optimum” power/performance. If you can identify a solution that will work and has adequate software and technical support, that is likely your best choice. Don’t get caught chasing specs.
Building The Solution
Once functionality and technology have been chosen, the next step is implementation. Often the focus is on the implementation of a neural network model, however businesses also have to deal with the implementation of logic (software/hardware) to handle the pipeline from sensor to final output, requiring unique algorithms at each step.
Questions that might come up include:

  • What kind of signal conditioning/filtering do I need before passing the data to a NN accelerator?
  • Which NN model should I use? Is there an existing model for my technology selection? Which version of which model is best in my application?
  • How do I train my model? Where do I get my data and what biases are built into that data? What volume of data do I need?
  • What is the cost and availability of the processing power for training models? Do we train in the cloud or on local servers?
  • What level of accuracy is adequate? Is it better to have false positives or false negatives?
  • What post processing is required and can I handle that workload?
Final Words Of Advice
With so many vendors voicing conflicting claims, it is important for businesses looking to implement edge AI not to focus on finding the “best TOPS” or the “fastest” solution, as these are elusive goals. The best way to answer many of these questions of functionality, technology choice and implementation is to partner with a person or organization that has “been there, done that.” Someone with the experience to quickly evaluate potential use cases, technical solutions and vendor offerings to help you narrow your choices as quickly and accurately as possible. Focus on vendors that have the most complete solution, with both the engine to implement, but also models, algorithms, and even existing data to help you in your unique use case and create a solid proof of concept.

MegaChips_Douglas_Fairbairn.webp
Douglas Fairbairn is a Silicon Valley veteran and currently director of business development for MegaChips, a $1 billion Japanese ASIC company expanding into the US. After graduating from Stanford with an MSEE, he spent 8 years at Xerox PARC. He then helped establish the ASIC business as cofounder of VLSI Technology and later of Redwood Design Automation, where he served as CEO until its acquisition by Cadence. He is now leveraging his ASIC and startup experience by helping establish MegaChips as a leading ASIC vendor in the US with special expertise in Edge AI technology.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 33 users
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

Dhm

Regular

Implementing edge AI: Look before you leap​

June 28, 2022 Douglas Fairbairn



As the need for artificial intelligence grows more common and technology needs become more sophisticated, companies looking to adopt edge AI into their products often find it to be a difficult challenge. But what makes it so difficult, and what solutions exist to solve this problem?
Perhaps the single biggest issue that companies face in implementing edge AI is that most companies don’t have the resources in house to develop these sophisticated fast-changing technologies. Lack of trained personnel and little familiarity with design flow often leads to delayed timelines and excess expense to train team members. In addition, there are so many choices, it is impossible for engineers to explore each option. And since every application is different, it may not be appropriate to replicate solutions based on past implementations. However, by asking a few key questions and finding the right partner to take your project from ideation to silicon, any enterprise can develop a roadmap to successfully deploy edge AI in their devices.
Defining Use Cases And Feasibility
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL DOWN TO CONTINUE READING
It is important to define use cases before exploring implementation options. The first question any business should ask is: What would the customer find truly useful? After pinpointing the functionality the customer wants, your team needs to set development and production cost goals along with the acceptable time to market.
Now comes the challenging part – making technology-related decisions. Is it possible to implement that functionality within the cost, time, power and space tradeoffs you’re dealing with? Working with an experienced partner/consultant or drawing on internal experience is critical at this stage. You won’t have perfect data on which to base your decision, so actual experience is essential in making these judgements.
Technology Choice
There are several choices a team can make to implement the customer’s desired functionality in the product. Depending on your available resources and development time, here are some of the choices a team might consider:
ADVERTISING

  • Software only on the existing embedded processor – This may require very carefully coded models in order to achieve the desired performance. Functionality may be limited, but it is generally the lowest cost solution if it works. Because this is a software-only solution, upgrades or bug fixes are more easily addressed.
  • Upgrade/replace the existing processor – This can be a great solution if you can make it work and preserve existing code base, and like the solution above, is software-only and can be easily fixed or upgraded. However, this can often start a project down a slippery path that requires extensive power and performance evaluation. Companies may be better off adding a neural network (NN) or similar accelerator.
  • Add a fixed neural network accelerator – This is an optimum choice if there is a good match with the needs of the application, as evaluation and design may not be too difficult. It could very well provide excellent power/performance tradeoffs at a very reasonable cost.
  • FPGA – This solution is flexible and upgradable, but typically comes with high cost and high power for the final product. Rarely is this a good choice for “edge” products.
  • Dedicated SoC – Often this is the optimum choice for high volume, low cost and low power products where use cases are clearly defined.
How To Evaluate The Right Choice
It can be difficult to evaluate the right choice without expertise from trained professionals in the edge AI chip space. Evaluation of each option can often take a long time and require extensive knowledge. For example, evaluating a fixed accelerator versus an FPGA implementation can require engineers with different skill sets. With so many vendors and solutions making conflicting claims, making basic decisions can be overwhelming for most enterprises.
One of the most important steps one can take is to find the right partner who can help evaluate the technology tradeoffs and take the company from the initial research and evaluation stage to the design and implementation of the solution. Also, don’t get hung up on finding the solution with the “optimum” power/performance. If you can identify a solution that will work and has adequate software and technical support, that is likely your best choice. Don’t get caught chasing specs.
Building The Solution
Once functionality and technology have been chosen, the next step is implementation. Often the focus is on the implementation of a neural network model, however businesses also have to deal with the implementation of logic (software/hardware) to handle the pipeline from sensor to final output, requiring unique algorithms at each step.
Questions that might come up include:

  • What kind of signal conditioning/filtering do I need before passing the data to a NN accelerator?
  • Which NN model should I use? Is there an existing model for my technology selection? Which version of which model is best in my application?
  • How do I train my model? Where do I get my data and what biases are built into that data? What volume of data do I need?
  • What is the cost and availability of the processing power for training models? Do we train in the cloud or on local servers?
  • What level of accuracy is adequate? Is it better to have false positives or false negatives?
  • What post processing is required and can I handle that workload?
Final Words Of Advice
With so many vendors voicing conflicting claims, it is important for businesses looking to implement edge AI not to focus on finding the “best TOPS” or the “fastest” solution, as these are elusive goals. The best way to answer many of these questions of functionality, technology choice and implementation is to partner with a person or organization that has “been there, done that.” Someone with the experience to quickly evaluate potential use cases, technical solutions and vendor offerings to help you narrow your choices as quickly and accurately as possible. Focus on vendors that have the most complete solution, with both the engine to implement, but also models, algorithms, and even existing data to help you in your unique use case and create a solid proof of concept.

MegaChips_Douglas_Fairbairn.webp
Douglas Fairbairn is a Silicon Valley veteran and currently director of business development for MegaChips, a $1 billion Japanese ASIC company expanding into the US. After graduating from Stanford with an MSEE, he spent 8 years at Xerox PARC. He then helped establish the ASIC business as cofounder of VLSI Technology and later of Redwood Design Automation, where he served as CEO until its acquisition by Cadence. He is now leveraging his ASIC and startup experience by helping establish MegaChips as a leading ASIC vendor in the US with special expertise in Edge AI technology.
Hi @Rocket577 I was all set to email Douglas Fairbiarn but just realised he is batting for our team. Go MegaChips! And go Brainchip. He could have dropped a sly Brainchip hint, but I’m happy with his support.
For those following my golfing around Scotland, The Machrie course on Islay is a must do, especially if it is followed by a visit to Laphroaig distillary.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 27 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
Hi @Rocket577 I was all set to email Douglas Fairbiarn but just realised he is batting for our team. Go MegaChips! And go Brainchip. He could have dropped a sly Brainchip hint, but I’m happy with his support.
For those following my golfing around Scotland, The Machrie course on Islay is a must do, especially if it is followed by a visit to Laphroaig distillary.
Hope you’ve had an egg, square sausage and black pudding roll for breakfast while visiting Scotland and maybe throw in some bacon and a hash brown
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5 users

Dhm

Regular
Hope you’ve had an egg, square sausage and black pudding roll for breakfast while visiting Scotland and maybe throw in some bacon and a hash brown
Anything that involves tripe, intestine, heart and lungs, no matter how they are presented, will not enter my temple. However deep respect for the roll such traditional dishes nourished and strengthened the Scottish in their history.
Just love Scotland!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 7 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
Anything that involves tripe, intestine, heart and lungs, no matter how they are presented, will not enter my temple. However deep respect for the roll such traditional dishes nourished and strengthened the Scottish in their history.
Just love Scotland!
Well that’s were your lucky, black pudding contains none of the above pig organs.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 31 users

cosors

👀
Hope you’ve had an egg, square sausage and black pudding roll for breakfast while visiting Scotland and maybe throw in some bacon and a hash brown
Scotland?!
Screenshot_2022-06-24-22-17-07-76_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

☺️😉
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8 users

alwaysgreen

Top 20
While we're on the topic of Scotland


1656449369933.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 21 users

Getupthere

Regular


Next-Gen BMW 5 Series to Get Level 3 Autonomous Driving in Europe: Report


Jun 28, 2022 | 11:27 AM


The yet-to-arrive and newest generation of the BMW 5 Series (platform code G60/G61) hasn’t even been spied without all of its camo yet, and it still won’t be revealed until later this year. A report from the BMW forum Bimmerpost, however, suggests that European buyers might have the chance to order Level 3 autonomous driving on their upcoming 5 series by 2024, a year earlier than previously reported. The source, forum user ynguldyn, is the same as the one that suggested the return of the M5 Touring and previously predicted the launch of the M4 CSL this year.


The report states that the G60 5 Series will go on sale in July 2023, launching with a few ICE models and two i5-branded EVs. Next will come the launch of hybrids and another EV; after that point, the report states that in July 2024, “L3 autonomous driving [will be] added to select European models.” The G61 5 Series (the wagon version) will be offered with Level 3 autonomous drivingat the same time, although the user further notes that they have not seen Level3 functionality (which they claim will be marketed by BMW as “Personal Pilot”) shown as an option for United States-spec cars at all. As one final bit of salt in the wound for U.S. buyers, the report further confirms the U.S. won’t be getting the long-roof 5 Series wagon at all, autonomous or not. The Drive reached out to BMW for any confirmation of the forum post but had not heard back at the time of this story’s publication.


Level 3 autonomy is defined by the SAE as the lowest tier of computerized driving assists that constitute “self-driving” functionality. Most higher-end cars on the market today offer Level 2 autonomy (for example, lane keep and adaptive cruise control working together, such as with Tesla’s Autopilot or GM’s Super Cruise), which still requires active input and attention from the driver at all times. The jump to Level 3 autonomy is massive because it dictates that the driver can stop paying attention to the road for portions of the drive (although they may need to take over when alerted). The car can drive without input from a human being at lower speeds in good conditions, such as in traffic jams on well-lit freeways. There are currently no Level 3-equipped cars for sale in the U.S., although that could change later this year, as Mercedes-Benz has announced that it intends to offer the S-Class and EQS with the feature in California and Nevada by the end of 2022.


BMW would not be the first company to offer Level 3 autonomy—that honor goes to Honda with the Japan-only Legend and followed closely by Mercedes, which already offers the EQS and S-Class in Europe with Level 3 functionality—but it would be part of an incredibly small club. BMW notes that it has been experimenting with self-driving research on public roads since 2011 and has partnered with Qualcomm to build the sensor and computer networks required for autonomous driving. But if the mystery poster is right, the results of those years of development might be seen in short order.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 20 users

Baisyet

Regular
So Renesas and SiFive partnering


 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users
Top Bottom