BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Zedjack33
Regular
I’m not sure what/who Tech was responding to. Seemed disjointed.
Attachments
Rise from the ashes
Regular
Violin1
Regular
Love your thinking FF - are you still a 1% man? lol
mrgds
Regular
Yes Hoppy,
IMO this is excactly what needs to happen, as PVDM now has the "undistracted runway" for AKD500, 1500, 2000,
Let the "man" in the "Northstar" do what he does best.
AKIDA BALLISTA
Hi everyone. You MUST watch "Our Brain" https://iview.abc.net.au/video/DO2013H001S00
It aired on TV last night & is now on iView via the URL above.
Early on, it explains how the brain works and from that, it is easy to relate it to PVDM's tech whereby sparsity is key.
Later it discusses recent research that Peter may not know about so it occurred to me then that there may be refinements that could be added to Peter's IP to improve accuracy.
For instance (you'll have to view the show to fully understand), we perceive new things using previous experience and we have bias too. so the truth/inference we perceive may be wrong. If the bias factor could be corrected by the IP, the output/inference would be correct.
If the refinements or principles thereof are/is patentable then we may be ahead of the game.
The show has episodes and I "cain't huuurdly wait" for next Tuesday.
It aired on TV last night & is now on iView via the URL above.
Early on, it explains how the brain works and from that, it is easy to relate it to PVDM's tech whereby sparsity is key.
Later it discusses recent research that Peter may not know about so it occurred to me then that there may be refinements that could be added to Peter's IP to improve accuracy.
For instance (you'll have to view the show to fully understand), we perceive new things using previous experience and we have bias too. so the truth/inference we perceive may be wrong. If the bias factor could be corrected by the IP, the output/inference would be correct.
If the refinements or principles thereof are/is patentable then we may be ahead of the game.
The show has episodes and I "cain't huuurdly wait" for next Tuesday.
Zedjack33
Regular
Rise from the ashes
Regular
They're a couple years late. Those thousands of percent gains most of their readers missed
Still a couple of 10 bags to come though so all is not lost for motley subscribers.
Dolci
Regular
I think they did, but not directly, if you recall the sympathy towards Peter in the room that was voted against Peter as a Director, 109,789,182 to be precise, you can't tell me that was just retail, ...IMO it came much higher up in the food chain...Quite possibly because no one asked that question
Fact Finder
Top 20
It is interesting that:
1. Peter van der Made initiated the search for the Manager of the Research Institute whose job includes ensuring the timely completion of all paperwork related to the lodging of world wide patents on a daily basis as well as staffing and leases AND managing the move to new larger shinier premises.
2. Some might think Peter van der Made is better occupied with research and his Board duties. Peter van der Made clearly thought so.
3. Peter van der Made remains on the Board
4. Peter van der Made remains Chief Technology Officer
5. Peter van der Made flew from Perth to Sydney for the AGM
6. Peter van der Made sat at the table with all the Board members and answered questions deferred to him by the Chair
7. Peter van der Made attended with the CEO and other Board members and jointly presented to Institutional Investors after the AGM in Sydney
8. Peter van der Made attended at social events and spoke to some retail shareholders
9. Peter van der Made according to all reports strongly supports the new CEO and current direction
10. Peter van der Made remains the number one shareholder
11. Peter van der Made by has actions raised no question that I perceive needed to be asked unless I disagree with a company having a just in case succession plan for key management and research employees. I don’t disagree it just makes sense.
12. There was nothing preventing anyone of the 65 shareholders in attendance or those on line submitting questions if they had such concerns and as no questions were forthcoming from retail or institutional investors it seems my personal lack of concern was shared by all.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
1. Peter van der Made initiated the search for the Manager of the Research Institute whose job includes ensuring the timely completion of all paperwork related to the lodging of world wide patents on a daily basis as well as staffing and leases AND managing the move to new larger shinier premises.
2. Some might think Peter van der Made is better occupied with research and his Board duties. Peter van der Made clearly thought so.
3. Peter van der Made remains on the Board
4. Peter van der Made remains Chief Technology Officer
5. Peter van der Made flew from Perth to Sydney for the AGM
6. Peter van der Made sat at the table with all the Board members and answered questions deferred to him by the Chair
7. Peter van der Made attended with the CEO and other Board members and jointly presented to Institutional Investors after the AGM in Sydney
8. Peter van der Made attended at social events and spoke to some retail shareholders
9. Peter van der Made according to all reports strongly supports the new CEO and current direction
10. Peter van der Made remains the number one shareholder
11. Peter van der Made by has actions raised no question that I perceive needed to be asked unless I disagree with a company having a just in case succession plan for key management and research employees. I don’t disagree it just makes sense.
12. There was nothing preventing anyone of the 65 shareholders in attendance or those on line submitting questions if they had such concerns and as no questions were forthcoming from retail or institutional investors it seems my personal lack of concern was shared by all.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
mrgds
Regular
............ had never seen that before,How ridiculosly appropriate to the BRN story, ............ BUT?, only 10X from here? .............
AKIDA (more than 10x) BALLISTA
BaconLover
Founding Member
So they did address the issue and explained Peter was going to concentrate on his Research in Perth which was rather given a top priority, so that question did get addressed, indirectly.
buena suerte :-)
BOB Bank of Brainchip
Fact Finder
Top 20
I might be persuaded that 1.5% is possible but I do now accept that the market is trillions not billions.
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Dolci
Regular
...so where does it say that he was going to step down in the AGM presentation? if I may be so bold as to say that it is still in progress ... or is this one of those imaginary things that will happen when it happens?...
mrgds
Regular
Have you been talking with Cathy FF? ..........I might be persuaded that 1.5% is possible but I do now accept that the market is trillions not billions.
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
AKIDA "TRILLISTA"
Wags
Regular
1000% agree FF.
The company is again just demonstrating maturity and wisdom. Succession plans for all should apply, some shoes easier to fill than others, but extremely important risk assessments to consider.
Peter, IMO, is a seasoned allrounder, able to fit into any spot as needed (and demonstrated). Though from all I have heard and read, he is more excited and passionate about spiking neurones than minutes of meetings.
Im happy that solid business acumen is steering this company, and also very happy for Peter and Anil, to be collaborating with like minded clever cats, to enhance and improve their creation.
What's that old work/life saying......."Do more of what you Love"
supersonic001
Regular
Similar threads
